Re: England vs Australia
Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:33 pm
I blame SmithEpaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:28 pmTrue! I mean he’s just had to sit watching that shower of shit unfold!
I blame SmithEpaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:28 pmTrue! I mean he’s just had to sit watching that shower of shit unfold!
Which Tyler wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:22 pm Can we get Cheika in in time for the 6N
Mostly suggesting this to annoy the Leicester fans
Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:19 pmThat’s not making the PRC for youMellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:12 pmI can’t believe a man of your standing was made to sit behind the posts.Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 9:35 pm
I’ve never argued we don’t get the best out of what we have, pretty consistent on that. In fact, my biggest issue, cos it’s in your gift. It’s both possible to get the absolute best out of players, yet still come up short. Be nice to find out.
Jones was a huge winner relatively and you hated that. So what do you really want.
Today was a massive blow- Oz are in a huge transitional phase, but kept playing what was in front of them; which was a team who were both inept on the basics, failed to grasp the key moments, and utterly fell apart in the last hour.
For all Scrumheads… er passion.. Smith produced magic moments for sure; but I was behind the posts, and he utterly fcks most standard plays with a combo of always trying to make the play about him and never hitting a straight line…. He’s a mare to play outside as a consequence. Had he and Spencer been a proper playmaking duo, we would have been 30 points up after 20 mins imo. That doesn’t excuse ridiculous error count, and the worst midfield defence I think I’ve seen from an allegedly full strength side.
It was a disgrace, and several folks should be considering their position.![]()
gee ....er...summatp/d wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:32 pmI can.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:12 pmI can’t believe a man of your standing was made to sit behind the posts.Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 9:35 pm
I’ve never argued we don’t get the best out of what we have, pretty consistent on that. In fact, my biggest issue, cos it’s in your gift. It’s both possible to get the absolute best out of players, yet still come up short. Be nice to find out.
Jones was a huge winner relatively and you hated that. So what do you really want.
Today was a massive blow- Oz are in a huge transitional phase, but kept playing what was in front of them; which was a team who were both inept on the basics, failed to grasp the key moments, and utterly fell apart in the last hour.
For all Scrumheads… er passion.. Smith produced magic moments for sure; but I was behind the posts, and he utterly fcks most standard plays with a combo of always trying to make the play about him and never hitting a straight line…. He’s a mare to play outside as a consequence. Had he and Spencer been a proper playmaking duo, we would have been 30 points up after 20 mins imo. That doesn’t excuse ridiculous error count, and the worst midfield defence I think I’ve seen from an allegedly full strength side.
It was a disgrace, and several folks should be considering their position.![]()
I mean, in fairness, providing coaches for the RFU to pay release fees for is a major part of our balance sheet, so we are due another injection of cash.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:22 pm Can we get Cheika in in time for the 6N
Mostly suggesting this to annoy the Leicester fans
Really?!? I was shouting at the television about how ponderous he was getting the ball away and how slow his passing was. Thought we looked much better when Randall came on and actually gave some zip from the base.
From the flow of the discussion, I take it you mean that Smith was bang average. If so, what did you think about Ford, Lawrence and Slade? I'd say that in this game none of them looked international quality. (I don't know who smudge is.)
Smudger Smith. The whole team was bang average being kind after the first 20 mins, when their concentration went to shyte. Very very poor.
Yes, equally a mess. In attack in the backs we’re too close together then compounded by lateral running by all tbh, and zero patience; defence was simply terrible, no obvious talking or pattern to it, scrambling across not happening. Looked like they didn’t know each frankly. Never seen a teams wheels come off so quickly.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:23 am Torturing myself by watching the game again. England in attack are all over the place. Alignment is non existent, the passing is often behind the man / overrun, and there seems no clear idea what the purpose of each phase is. Be interested to know how it looked from behind the posts as the view is different. But we look, from the TV, an absolute mess. There’s also obvious miss communication going on a lot!
Yep. Shape goes to shit after only 2/3 phases from what I remember. I’m not enough of a masochist to watch again so won’t be ruining my Sunday morning by confirming via replay.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:23 am Torturing myself by watching the game again. England in attack are all over the place. Alignment is non existent, the passing is often behind the man / overrun, and there seems no clear idea what the purpose of each phase is. Be interested to know how it looked from behind the posts as the view is different. But we look, from the TV, an absolute mess. There’s also obvious miss communication going on a lot!
Quality and speed of ball was piss poor whoever was at 9 it seemed to me
My take on Spencer is that viewers can be misled by his hard passing (i.e. flat and not loopy like Youngs's). What is more important, IMO, is that he delays for split seconds like Youngs did. Overall, the arrival of the ball in the recipient's hands IS slower (later) than it should be. He also kicks far too much, though that may be coach-induced. Either way, he is the root cause of missed attacking opportunities. Did he once run with the ball?Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:36 amQuality and speed of ball was piss poor whoever was at 9 it seemed to me
Agreed. Making him captain was a major error no matter how good he might be at that job. The captaincy disguises his inadequacy as a player.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:54 am Another observation as I hit half time of the replay. Jamie George looks an utterly spent force as an international player.
Again seemed to me that our inaccuracy at the breakdown was more of a problem than who was at 9; then again none of the halfbacks were making the right decisions in attack. We botched tries early on cos of this.Oakboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:56 amMy take on Spencer is that viewers can be misled by his hard passing (i.e. flat and not loopy like Youngs's). What is more important, IMO, is that he delays for split seconds like Youngs did. Overall, the arrival of the ball in the recipient's hands IS slower (later) than it should be. He also kicks far too much, though that may be coach-induced. Either way, he is the root cause of missed attacking opportunities. Did he once run with the ball?
Smith gets flack for trying to do too much with poor/late ball. He must be persevered with and given the whole 80 at 10 if he's physically OK, as he clearly was yesterday. SB is crazy to have Ford in the 23 ahead of Fin Smith. How many more disastrous cameos does it need to make that point?
Totally agree. Left to right was often ropey as shit. Compounded by the first receiver being all over the place.Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:36 amQuality and speed of ball was piss poor whoever was at 9 it seemed to me
Not just George, Dan Cole was struggling at scrum time. Wrong Leicester tighthead.Oakboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:58 amAgreed. Making him captain was a major error no matter how good he might be at that job. The captaincy disguises his inadequacy as a player.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:54 am Another observation as I hit half time of the replay. Jamie George looks an utterly spent force as an international player.
So many times the first receiver was not in any way in a position of attacking intent. Basic body and pitch position.Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:05 amAgain seemed to me that our inaccuracy at the breakdown was more of a problem than who was at 9; then again none of the halfbacks were making the right decisions in attack. We botched tries early on cos of this.Oakboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:56 amMy take on Spencer is that viewers can be misled by his hard passing (i.e. flat and not loopy like Youngs's). What is more important, IMO, is that he delays for split seconds like Youngs did. Overall, the arrival of the ball in the recipient's hands IS slower (later) than it should be. He also kicks far too much, though that may be coach-induced. Either way, he is the root cause of missed attacking opportunities. Did he once run with the ball?
Smith gets flack for trying to do too much with poor/late ball. He must be persevered with and given the whole 80 at 10 if he's physically OK, as he clearly was yesterday. SB is crazy to have Ford in the 23 ahead of Fin Smith. How many more disastrous cameos does it need to make that point?
Everyone happy with Slade’s role in that last try? I’m not. He made a bad decision and had a weak Sleightholme outside him and Smith left in WTF’s happening no man’s land.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:08 pmI know that by the book you trust your inside man but that wasn’t by the book defence. Sleightholme wasn’t really coming across, rather he was beaten on the outside. I can see why Smith made the decision as for a second Sleightholme looks like he’s fecked it up, as he did for when Furbank had to gamble. Ultimately, if our onfield defensive guru hadn’t fecked up initially (again) Smith isn’t put in that position. We’re really arging over the symptom rather than the cause.