SF v SA

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1565
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by jngf »

Come on Pollard put us out of our misery!
Top
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by morepork »

Yeah, that was harsh.
Top
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1565
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by jngf »

Has Borthwick finally got the message? I fear not :(
Last edited by jngf on Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:48 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Top
switchskier
Posts: 2285
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by switchskier »

Stom wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:27 pm
switchskier wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:26 pm I think that England are going to do this. They're hitting harder than SA and look like they know what they are doing.
It’s Jones’ bloody master plan, isn’t it… one plan to beat SA. Now Slarti Bartfarst can use it.
I'm so sorry
Top
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4568
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Galfon »

He's still going :shock:
Top
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1815
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Adam_P »

Fucking Billy
Top
FKAS
Posts: 7407
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by FKAS »

Referee refuses to ref the final few minutes. Showing why an average ref shouldn't be given a semi final.
Top
Banquo
Posts: 20896
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Banquo »

billy v....tsk tsk
Top
FKAS
Posts: 7407
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by FKAS »

No tries for SA. Better than we expected. Pushed them to the limit. A different (better) ref and maybe that swings our way.
Top
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1565
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by jngf »

Please sack Mullins and Kay almost as biased as Phil Vickery and at least he had the good sense to stop his commentary career :)
Top
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1565
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by jngf »

Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:55 pm billy v....tsk tsk
Fat poddin
Top
Donny osmond
Posts: 3168
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Donny osmond »

I mean, we can talk about whether Farrell should play for England (no) but surely Sinkler and Vunipola can't be given any more chances?
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
Top
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16116
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: SF v SA

Post by Mellsblue »

“Playing 10 properly”… what does that even mean.
Top
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1565
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by jngf »

SCW still lauding iceman :)
Top
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1815
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Adam_P »

Farrell is responsible for that loss for giving them a kickable pen by getting us marched back 10m for being a cunt
Top
pompey-zebra
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by pompey-zebra »

Comiserations, but well done England, a real performance and a real contest.
Top
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4568
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Galfon »

Simples..SA reserve pack vastly superior to Eng at scrumtime.
Steward's poor kick sealed it at the crucial time.
Well done SA.
Well done Eng for making a game of it, helped by the weather.
Never looked like scoring a try, has to be said.
Top
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1565
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by jngf »

Genge and Sinckler good carriers but not great at bread and butter of scrummaging
Top
badback
Posts: 200
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:42 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by badback »

Second front row no up to it.

Billy cannot keep ball in contact


But that said they had a limited team and coaches constructed a very limited game plan. And it almost worked.
Top
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1565
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by jngf »

Being more positive Martin was great!
Top
16th man
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by 16th man »

Koch has done what any prop would when he realises the ref isn't interested in him.

It's all ifs and buts, that last Steward kick, when we'd just had joy killing their momentum by kicking longer was a killer error.
Top
Banquo
Posts: 20896
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Banquo »

FKAS wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:56 pm No tries for SA. Better than we expected. Pushed them to the limit. A different (better) ref and maybe that swings our way.
well apart from snymans
Top
MrK
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:27 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by MrK »

FKAS wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:56 pm No tries for SA. Better than we expected. Pushed them to the limit. A different (better) ref and maybe that swings our way.
No tries?
Top
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2210
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Spiffy »

So who says 10-man rugby is dead?
England lost that when they subbed the two starting props. Their replacements were absolutely munched in the scrums. That said, for the final SA scrum penalty that won the game, their TH was boring like hell.
Top
FKAS
Posts: 7407
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by FKAS »

MrK wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:01 pm
FKAS wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:56 pm No tries for SA. Better than we expected. Pushed them to the limit. A different (better) ref and maybe that swings our way.
No tries?
:lol: yeah one and not plural which is what we all expected.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “English Board”