Superb.Zhivago wrote:
Ted Hastings speaking for most of us i'm sure.
Superb.Zhivago wrote:
And now Sue Gray is not going to publish her report until after the investigation has ended because it would be interfering with an active investigation. A cynic might note that the Met are getting involved at just the right time to delay any resolution and drag everything out. A cynic might note that Dick is firmly in Boris's pocket at the best of time and that this is politically ideal for him to spread this out, to try and create "party-fatigue" in the British public and reduce the outcry to a background hum of, "Not this thing again."Which Tyler wrote:
Puja wrote:And now Sue Gray is not going to publish her report until after the investigation has ended because it would be interfering with an active investigation. A cynic might note that the Met are getting involved at just the right time to delay any resolution and drag everything out. A cynic might note that Dick is firmly in Boris's pocket at the best of time and that this is politically ideal for him to spread this out, to try and create "party-fatigue" in the British public and reduce the outcry to a background hum of, "Not this thing again."
Thankfully, we're not cynics, so we'll all believe that the Met suddenly has reason to investigate today that they didn't a few weeks ago, and that they will certainly come back with a response that's not a muted, "Not enough evidence/not in the public interest to pursue," in three-six months' time.
Sue Gray has been talking to the police all along. Rumour has it a clear threshold was breached and now the police are interested. Ultimately it’s only a fixed penalty notice but Boris doesn’t benefit from this at all. I don’t see the anger dying down any time soon.Puja wrote:And now Sue Gray is not going to publish her report until after the investigation has ended because it would be interfering with an active investigation. A cynic might note that the Met are getting involved at just the right time to delay any resolution and drag everything out. A cynic might note that Dick is firmly in Boris's pocket at the best of time and that this is politically ideal for him to spread this out, to try and create "party-fatigue" in the British public and reduce the outcry to a background hum of, "Not this thing again."Which Tyler wrote:
Thankfully, we're not cynics, so we'll all believe that the Met suddenly has reason to investigate today that they didn't a few weeks ago, and that they will certainly come back with a response that's not a muted, "Not enough evidence/not in the public interest to pursue," in three-six months' time.
Puja
It does appear that I misjudged Ms Gray - the report is apparently being delivered this week and, as you said, she's dug up enough that the police have finally breached the threshold of "Do we *have* to be involved?"Sandydragon wrote:Sue Gray has been talking to the police all along. Rumour has it a clear threshold was breached and now the police are interested. Ultimately it’s only a fixed penalty notice but Boris doesn’t benefit from this at all. I don’t see the anger dying down any time soon.Puja wrote:And now Sue Gray is not going to publish her report until after the investigation has ended because it would be interfering with an active investigation. A cynic might note that the Met are getting involved at just the right time to delay any resolution and drag everything out. A cynic might note that Dick is firmly in Boris's pocket at the best of time and that this is politically ideal for him to spread this out, to try and create "party-fatigue" in the British public and reduce the outcry to a background hum of, "Not this thing again."Which Tyler wrote:
Thankfully, we're not cynics, so we'll all believe that the Met suddenly has reason to investigate today that they didn't a few weeks ago, and that they will certainly come back with a response that's not a muted, "Not enough evidence/not in the public interest to pursue," in three-six months' time.
Puja
Yep, it's a major effort in blandism.Son of Mathonwy wrote:I can't conceive of it being anything else.Sandydragon wrote:David Davies gives the mandatory ‘in the name of god go’ speech.
But.
If Sue Greys report is a major effort in blandism then it wouldn’t surprise me if somehow Boris hangs on.
Remember the Hutton inquiry. Blair's direct lies to journalists were described as follows: 'I consider that the answers given by the Prime Minister to members of the press in the aeroplane cast no light on the issues ...'
And that was from a judge. Grey is a civil servant who reports to Michael Gove. So her ultimate boss is Boris Johnson.
The BBC is suggesting that some of the crowd threw objects at the police officers protecting Starmer so there’s not much you can complain about of you have decided to let rip with a traffic cone at a copper. It suggests also that the police were called once the verbal abuse started rather than being there before hand although that’s not entirely clear.Zhivago wrote:Arrests after mob shout Savile slurs at Starmer
The Tory strategists will inevitably be leaping with joy that it has already cut through. This sort of propaganda is deleterious to our democracy. Johnson needs to learn the consequences to his actions.cashead wrote:Wonder who's paying for it. It's pretty blatantly this year's "Corbyn hates the Jewish people."
BJ has never met a consequence he hasn't been able to sweep under a rug or convince someone else to take the fall for - and he doesn't intend to start now.Zhivago wrote:This sort of propaganda is deleterious to our democracy. Johnson needs to learn the consequences to his actions.
All calculated. He doesn't think enough of his MPs will rebel so he can throw a few dead cats about and some of this will stick. If nothing else, it changes the narrative for a few days away from party gate.Which Tyler wrote:
Well there's a surprise - he'll neither amend the record, nor offer an apology, because he's an 6 year old boy caught with his hand in the biscuit tin, who's blaming the dog for the chocolate he's got smeared on his face
BJ has never met a consequence he hasn't been able to sweep under a rug or convince someone else to take the fall for - and he doesn't intend to start now.Zhivago wrote:This sort of propaganda is deleterious to our democracy. Johnson needs to learn the consequences to his actions.
Requires 54 of them to have the cold chill (and a spine, for that matter) before anything's accomplished though.cashead wrote:Somewhere, a Tory backbencher glances at the Operation: Save Big Dog (just fucking lol) memo and a cold chill runs down their spine.Which Tyler wrote:
Well there's a surprise - he'll neither amend the record, nor offer an apology, because he's an 6 year old boy caught with his hand in the biscuit tin, who's blaming the dog for the chocolate he's got smeared on his face
BJ has never met a consequence he hasn't been able to sweep under a rug or convince someone else to take the fall for - and he doesn't intend to start now.Zhivago wrote:This sort of propaganda is deleterious to our democracy. Johnson needs to learn the consequences to his actions.
I mean, if the rumours about his investment portfolio are correct, then he's certainly very adept at making opportunities out of Brexit.Sandydragon wrote:Mini reshuffle, Jacob Rees Mogg confirmed as Brexit Opportunities Minister.
Can't wait to see that in action.
Probably what Boris had in mind. He does have a lot of offspring to support...Puja wrote:I mean, if the rumours about his investment portfolio are correct, then he's certainly very adept at making opportunities out of Brexit.Sandydragon wrote:Mini reshuffle, Jacob Rees Mogg confirmed as Brexit Opportunities Minister.
Can't wait to see that in action.
Puja
Well it is his literal family legacy after all , how to profit from the suffering of those around you.Puja wrote:I mean, if the rumours about his investment portfolio are correct, then he's certainly very adept at making opportunities out of Brexit.Sandydragon wrote:Mini reshuffle, Jacob Rees Mogg confirmed as Brexit Opportunities Minister.
Can't wait to see that in action.
Puja
He makes 2 good points there.Which Tyler wrote:
Despicable. Will it work, I wonder? Some people will be willing to believe it, some will be disgusted at Johnson's tactics. The QAnon crew were never going to vote for Starmer anyway.Sandydragon wrote:All calculated. He doesn't think enough of his MPs will rebel so he can throw a few dead cats about and some of this will stick. If nothing else, it changes the narrative for a few days away from party gate.Which Tyler wrote:
Well there's a surprise - he'll neither amend the record, nor offer an apology, because he's an 6 year old boy caught with his hand in the biscuit tin, who's blaming the dog for the chocolate he's got smeared on his face
BJ has never met a consequence he hasn't been able to sweep under a rug or convince someone else to take the fall for - and he doesn't intend to start now.Zhivago wrote:This sort of propaganda is deleterious to our democracy. Johnson needs to learn the consequences to his actions.
He is gambling on the public having no attention span and forgetting about party gate, particularly if some of the mud sticks. Most of the anti-vax conspiracy nutters won't be influence either way but would probably like the excuse to get (more) angry at someone like Starmer. I suppose the question is that having crossed one line, how many more will he cross to hold onto power? I sense that the May elections will be interesting, but the next GE will be very dirty.Son of Mathonwy wrote:Despicable. Will it work, I wonder? Some people will be willing to believe it, some will be disgusted at Johnson's tactics. The QAnon crew were never going to vote for Starmer anyway.Sandydragon wrote:All calculated. He doesn't think enough of his MPs will rebel so he can throw a few dead cats about and some of this will stick. If nothing else, it changes the narrative for a few days away from party gate.Which Tyler wrote:
Well there's a surprise - he'll neither amend the record, nor offer an apology, because he's an 6 year old boy caught with his hand in the biscuit tin, who's blaming the dog for the chocolate he's got smeared on his face
BJ has never met a consequence he hasn't been able to sweep under a rug or convince someone else to take the fall for - and he doesn't intend to start now.
In the end though, it's a desperate tactic, no doubt a line Johnson would have preferred to save till a general election. So he's shot that bolt.