
NZ got quite a bit more from their wings in the series, the Lions pair were moored on the outside by comparison, though NZ is obviously a much more mature team
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
must have been under instruction as Daly especially has been coming off his wing a lot for England.Digby wrote:There was of course a missed kick to touch from Sexton off a penalty, and that's not good, but it came with the score at 7-3 and that whole phase ended with Murray clearing for a NZ lineout almost up the halfway. What I really liked in that whole sequence was the workrate of Dagg, especially when he forced the knock on from Williams off a Smith box kick, he comes off his right wing over to the left and then chases the kick from way back, and really makes quite a few players look lazy
NZ got quite a bit more from their wings in the series, the Lions pair were moored on the outside by comparison, though NZ is obviously a much more mature team
Kept it simpler for the Lions to retain their shape, but they could have gotten a lot more from Watson and one would think especially DalyBanquo wrote:must have been under instruction as Daly especially has been coming off his wing a lot for England.Digby wrote:There was of course a missed kick to touch from Sexton off a penalty, and that's not good, but it came with the score at 7-3 and that whole phase ended with Murray clearing for a NZ lineout almost up the halfway. What I really liked in that whole sequence was the workrate of Dagg, especially when he forced the knock on from Williams off a Smith box kick, he comes off his right wing over to the left and then chases the kick from way back, and really makes quite a few players look lazy
NZ got quite a bit more from their wings in the series, the Lions pair were moored on the outside by comparison, though NZ is obviously a much more mature team
Now that's a fun idea! There's no official player release rules for the Barbarians and it's not within the official international window, so it would be at the discretion of the clubs first and foremost. Plus, all four home nations have a game the next weekend, so I'd imagine they'd not be keen on cutting down their preparation time.I R Geech wrote:Anyone know what the rules are on player release for the Barbarians? Could they do a '73 and pick what is more or less a Lions side vs NZ in November?
Watching the game back and there was indeed cause for Sexton to go off for an HIA. I had thought it possible the Lions were playing silly buggers in just getting Te'o on in a fashion which would allow them to swap back. But actually Sexton does take a bang to the head from Barrett's knee it seems, nothing deliberate from Barrett, but after a few comments on Mako's ruck clearing work last week Barrett largely surrenders any moral high ground going in at the side off his feet and clonking Sexton.Digby wrote:HIA for Sexton?
I don't really do stats as they say there more for support than illumination - can judge a game myself as can you. Anyway I think the they were pretty even all told?zer0 wrote:That's typically how things go on modern NH three tests tours of NZ. The second test is the closest and the third the most lopsided.Puja wrote:Yeah, they didn't make a huge impression on England in 2014 for the first two tests and then horsed us in the third.
2012 NZL vs IRE II: 19-3 (+16)
2012 NZL vs IRE III: 60-0 (+60)
2014 NZL vs ENG II: 28-27 (+1)
2014 NZL vs ENG III: 36-13 (+23)
2016 NZL vs WAL II: 36-22 (+14)
2016 NZL vs WAL III: 46-6 (+40)
2013 France are the anomaly in that their first test was the closest (23-13), while they got pantsed slightly more in the second test (30-0) than the third (24-9).
While the Lions are obviously stronger in depth than any of those individual sides, it does suggest a general trend in All Black performances, and NH fatigue, over a series, I think.
So the Lions get 57% possession and 62% territory against the Crusaders and "hosed" them. Whereas the All Blacks get 61% possession and 62% territory against the Lions in the first test and "made no impression". I see.paddy no 11 wrote:It wasn't all that bad, retaalick won a few turnovers etc. Apparently lions done 2 sessions the Thursday before which would explain that. Lions hosed the crusaders which had a significant intl presence
Hah - joke's on us! The success of this series now means Gatland's guaranteed to be back for 2021!paddy no 11 wrote:Great series glad Liam williams turned around the lions style by making those line breaks, looking forward to a lions team playing more rugby in 4 years time
No idea what you're referring to.morepork wrote:Pork and Puha.
Ah - I thought you might have been referring to a typo, which as you can see from my post, doesn't exist and never ever did. I don't even know how to edit, so I don't know why you'd bring that up.morepork wrote:Watercress and pig. Crosstalk between Maori and European food. Puha is watercress and rocks the shyte out of a hangi with the meat.
Was it a success? If there was a SH equivalent do you think it would be coached by the Argentine coach with 8 players from NZ, 7 from Argentina, 6 from Australia and none from South Africa?Puja wrote:Hah - joke's on us! The success of this series now means Gatland's guaranteed to be back for 2021!
Mind, I suppose I shouldn't be mocking him too much. He can now really point to his record with the Lions and invite any critics to f*ck off.
Puja
Its a results based game, and his record with the Lions matches or exceeds any other coach. He may not use the players or tactics that people want, but he has been successful with the Lions.Puja wrote:Hah - joke's on us! The success of this series now means Gatland's guaranteed to be back for 2021!paddy no 11 wrote:Great series glad Liam williams turned around the lions style by making those line breaks, looking forward to a lions team playing more rugby in 4 years time
Mind, I suppose I shouldn't be mocking him too much. He can now really point to his record with the Lions and invite any critics to f*ck off.
Puja
The Lions have won one series in New Zealand. With bugger all prep time, a draw is a good result for the Lions. A win would have been superb, but since most people seemed to think that it would be a Blackwash, I'm quite pleased with the result.old-n-slo-2nd-row wrote:Was it a success? If there was a SH equivalent do you think it would be coached by the Argentine coach with 8 players from NZ, 7 from Argentina, 6 from Australia and none from South Africa?Puja wrote:Hah - joke's on us! The success of this series now means Gatland's guaranteed to be back for 2021!
Mind, I suppose I shouldn't be mocking him too much. He can now really point to his record with the Lions and invite any critics to f*ck off.
Puja
agreed. I thought they might lose all the Saturday matches and a couple of midweek ones. We will never know if another coach could have done better, but I reckon he's done ok.Sandydragon wrote:The Lions have won one series in New Zealand. With bugger all prep time, a draw is a good result for the Lions. A win would have been superb, but since most people seemed to think that it would be a Blackwash, I'm quite pleased with the result.old-n-slo-2nd-row wrote:Was it a success? If there was a SH equivalent do you think it would be coached by the Argentine coach with 8 players from NZ, 7 from Argentina, 6 from Australia and none from South Africa?Puja wrote:Hah - joke's on us! The success of this series now means Gatland's guaranteed to be back for 2021!
Mind, I suppose I shouldn't be mocking him too much. He can now really point to his record with the Lions and invite any critics to f*ck off.
Puja
paddy no 11 wrote:I don't really do stats as they say there more for support than illumination - can judge a game myself as can you. Anyway I think the they were pretty even all told?zer0 wrote:That's typically how things go on modern NH three tests tours of NZ. The second test is the closest and the third the most lopsided.Puja wrote:Yeah, they didn't make a huge impression on England in 2014 for the first two tests and then horsed us in the third.
2012 NZL vs IRE II: 19-3 (+16)
2012 NZL vs IRE III: 60-0 (+60)
2014 NZL vs ENG II: 28-27 (+1)
2014 NZL vs ENG III: 36-13 (+23)
2016 NZL vs WAL II: 36-22 (+14)
2016 NZL vs WAL III: 46-6 (+40)
2013 France are the anomaly in that their first test was the closest (23-13), while they got pantsed slightly more in the second test (30-0) than the third (24-9).
While the Lions are obviously stronger in depth than any of those individual sides, it does suggest a general trend in All Black performances, and NH fatigue, over a series, I think.
So the Lions get 57% possession and 62% territory against the Crusaders and "hosed" them. Whereas the All Blacks get 61% possession and 62% territory against the Lions in the first test and "made no impression". I see.paddy no 11 wrote:It wasn't all that bad, retaalick won a few turnovers etc. Apparently lions done 2 sessions the Thursday before which would explain that. Lions hosed the crusaders which had a significant intl presence
either the TMO's do their job properly, or we get rid.Which Tyler wrote:http://rugbyreferee.net/2017/07/09/all- ... -changing/