SF v SA
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 6496
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: SF v SA
Scrum was decisive. Got SA back into the game and led to the final (questionable) penalty.
England did a lot right and deserve a great deal of credit for the way they played. Not pretty but they worked hard and mostly effectively within a very limited gameplan.
Not the game i was expecting, so credit to all for a gutsy effort.
England did a lot right and deserve a great deal of credit for the way they played. Not pretty but they worked hard and mostly effectively within a very limited gameplan.
Not the game i was expecting, so credit to all for a gutsy effort.
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2537
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: SF v SA
Some players really stood up. Heartening, considering how a lot of the banter online has been about how pitiful England are.
BillyV looked so off the pace. It was upsetting seeing someone who has done such good stuff before end his international career like this.
I wonder how many more years england'll get out of Curry. He just looks done when he walks. What a shift through.
Maro Itoje is bloody brilliant.
On Farrell, Christ he is thick - he played well but giving up the 10m for arguing is pitiful.
Now to unleash the secret attacking game against Argentina for bronze.
BillyV looked so off the pace. It was upsetting seeing someone who has done such good stuff before end his international career like this.
I wonder how many more years england'll get out of Curry. He just looks done when he walks. What a shift through.
Maro Itoje is bloody brilliant.
On Farrell, Christ he is thick - he played well but giving up the 10m for arguing is pitiful.
Now to unleash the secret attacking game against Argentina for bronze.
- Puja
- Posts: 18189
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: SF v SA
We're picking on Sinckler, but I think Martin going off from the tighthead lock position made a massive difference. We looked much less comfortable without him, even with Cole on.
That last scrum penalty was utter bullshit though. Don't blame Owen and George for being fuming on that one.
Puja
That last scrum penalty was utter bullshit though. Don't blame Owen and George for being fuming on that one.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:15 am
Re: SF v SA
The only time's we might have scored a try was that lineout in their 22 and we lost it. Poor execution at crucial moments I guess.
TBH though, in the main we played really well. Limited plan. Stuck to it. Almost managed it. If we could have fashioned one more three pointer we'd have had it but our attack at the end was non-existent (as indeed for most of the game). On a negative, the brave defeat is possibly the worst result going forwards if certain player get to hang on a bit longer despite performances prior to this evening.
Last edited by Insouciant on Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jngf
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: SF v SA
With George Ford at 10 I think we might have won that - Boks we’re knackered and a shadow of last match - to be fair England played far better than hitherto - still not a creative team though which is why I think we ultimately weren’t quite worthy of a World Cup final place on this occasion
Last edited by jngf on Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1815
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: SF v SA
Borthwick has gained some credit with this performance, as have a fair number of players. But if Billy Vunipola plays another game for England, he can get to fuck
-
- Posts: 5973
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: SF v SA
Were the Boks creative?jngf wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:05 pm With George Ford at 10 I think we might have won that - Boks we’re knackered and a shadow of last match - to be fair England played far better than hitherto - still not a creative team though which is why I think we ultimately weren’t quite worthy of a World Cup final place on this occasion
-
- Posts: 5973
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: SF v SA
In fairness. That’s the best I’ve ever heard Farrell speak.
An honest interview.
An honest interview.
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:15 am
Re: SF v SA
It doesn't feel nice to single players out after such a great effort, but BV was pretty poor. Curry limped off so he likely had to be replaced, but on a defensive lineout of that nature? Tough time to do it.
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1815
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: SF v SA
I'd take a one legged, 79 minute Curry over a fresh Vunipola
- jngf
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
-
- Posts: 6496
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: SF v SA
Borthwick got most of his selection calls right but Ludlam should have been on the bench for this game. Vunipola shouldnt have been in the 23.
- Puja
- Posts: 18189
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: SF v SA
Came on for the blood injury and cocked up by knocking on and giving them possession for their pen.Insouciant wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:10 pmIt doesn't feel nice to single players out after such a great effort, but BV was pretty poor. Curry limped off so he likely had to be replaced, but on a defensive lineout of that nature? Tough time to do it.
Came on as a full sub and drifted off in defence, completely ignoring the breakaway.
I can understand the instinct to want BillyV on the bench and hope he'll pull out one more big performance - his ceiling is so much higher than any other option. However, that performance was match-losing.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1815
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: SF v SA
In terms of future development sure, but all of those players were decent, good or excellent today
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:15 am
-
- Posts: 7397
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: SF v SA
Borthwick has taken a lot of stick over his tactics but they were pretty good today. Martin at lock was an inspired pick over the reliably good Chessum. We made it a far closer game than anybody expected and meant the Boks needed a couple of questionable calls to get the victory instead of the massacre we expected.
Let's hope he builds on this with a rebuild ahead of the 6N.
- jngf
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: SF v SA
Not in this match but I feel they can be but with current set up that’s not the case for us with Borthwick’s reliance on stodgy attritional rugbyScrumhead wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:08 pmWere the Boks creative?jngf wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:05 pm With George Ford at 10 I think we might have won that - Boks we’re knackered and a shadow of last match - to be fair England played far better than hitherto - still not a creative team though which is why I think we ultimately weren’t quite worthy of a World Cup final place on this occasion
-
- Posts: 12367
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:15 am
Re: SF v SA
Did he answer a question without re-framing everything?Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:19 pmDidn’t mind that from Borthwick either. The positivity actually felt genuine rather than performative.
-
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: SF v SA
I’ve searched PornHub extensively and never seen a more angled Koch!
- jngf
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: SF v SA
He comes accross as humble in press conferences but a complete hot head when the pressure’s on in the match itself (penalty kicks accepted bar that time out) and not a great captain and not a test quality player when there’s clearly better options at 10 and 12. He’s more value to Saracens than England now
Last edited by jngf on Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 2210
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: SF v SA
The conditions were terrible, but even so, that was a pathetic attempt to play rugby by both teams. Zero creativity on display. SA got suckered into playing the game England wanted and almost paid the price.
Prepare yourselves for the heave-inducing adulation of Captain Courageous in the Sunday papers.
Prepare yourselves for the heave-inducing adulation of Captain Courageous in the Sunday papers.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16100
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: SF v SA
Even after a decade of research?Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:20 pm I’ve searched PornHub extensively and never seen a more angled Koch!
- Lizard
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: SF v SA
A lot of that was a pretty hard watch for the neutral. I feel for England, who dominated a lot of the match, but frankly you've got to score tries these days.
I'm on the look out for a category 3 or 4 Final ticket at about face value. Please let me know if you have any leads.
I'm on the look out for a category 3 or 4 Final ticket at about face value. Please let me know if you have any leads.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
-
- Posts: 20893
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: SF v SA
kriel....didnt touch the ball....marchant once.
11 pens are a killer.
fazball nearly worked. Pack were ace, bar 25 mins scrummaging and georges bizarre glitching
11 pens are a killer.
fazball nearly worked. Pack were ace, bar 25 mins scrummaging and georges bizarre glitching
Last edited by Banquo on Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.