Page 159 of 161
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2024 12:42 pm
by Banquo
oops #uck-ett
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2024 3:18 pm
by Galfon
Banquo wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 12:15 pm
#popethenewbell #notanumber3
that said, he actually averages better at 3 than 4-7
Ollie Pope averages 42 in Test cricket across innings where he faces 26 or more balls--- basically, a shyte starter
The present incumbent at #4 is in a decent run , so he'll have to concentrate a bit more early doors, or grovel !
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2024 3:29 pm
by Banquo
4 of 5 have been unforced errors, bit careless
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:43 pm
by Galfon
Now level with Cook at 33 tons a-piece, and he has Sangakkara and Cook firmly in his sights for the all-time 5th spot for runs scored.
Still plenty in the tank it seems.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:18 pm
by Galfon
228-3 effectively since Brook going, should put this one safe at least. Pope must think this caretaker-skip malarky is ok, but Sri L not the force they were tbf.
..though previous capitano M.Vaughan thinks otherwise:
(beeb)
"I don't like him as the captain," Vaughan told the Test Match Special podcast. "He's not the kind of personality I'd want as the England captain.
"He's quite an insecure human being - a great team guy and person but throwing the captaincy on him has added the pressure. He was doing great at number three.
"Harry Brook for me is an England captain in the making. I don't see Ollie Pope as that person."
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2024 7:31 am
by fivepointer
Fine innings by Joe but to get out with such an awful shot was a major letdown. Time to put the ramp away.
Pope's really not showing much as a number 3 batsman.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2024 8:32 am
by Banquo
fivepointer wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 7:31 am
a major letdown.
blimey thats harsh....
there's a long queue of shyte shots before having a pop at Root!
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2024 12:35 pm
by Banquo
Great ton by Atkinson
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:39 pm
by Galfon
Too many Silvas around recently, good to move them along...Sri L on the ropes a bit.Potts more to come you suspect..
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2024 3:26 pm
by Banquo
Galfon wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:39 pm
Too many Silvas around recently, good to move them along...Sri L on the ropes a bit.Potts more to come you suspect..
Just hop(p)ing one is called Long John
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:34 pm
by Banquo
Root is superb! English GOAT batsman… difficult
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2024 11:03 pm
by Galfon
Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:34 pm
Root is superb! English GOAT batsman… difficult
Certainly greatest since Cook..beyond that impossible to judge apart from the numbers, which for him are consistently exceptional.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2024 7:09 am
by fivepointer
There are a few with higher averages (Sutcliffe, Barrington, Hammond, Hobbs and Hutton) but only Cook has scored more runs and none played anything like the number of tests Root has.
If not GOAT he's got to be there or thereabouts.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2024 10:55 am
by Banquo
fivepointer wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 7:09 am
There are a few with higher averages (Sutcliffe, Barrington, Hammond, Hobbs and Hutton) but only Cook has scored more runs and none played anything like the number of tests Root has.
If not GOAT he's got to be there or thereabouts.
different times- much more test cricket, less f/c, covered wickets. Averages steadily climbing. He's way ahead of Cook for sure in most respects, save being an opener....but 'only'averages 40 v oz....
Hobbs is the hardest one to look beyond (and lost 4 prime years to ww1), but then again only played against Oz and SA, albeit on some nightmare wickets. Barrington has a very strong claim too by dint of who he played against. All great in their own ways.
Two hundreds in a test at lords and not MOTM is some 'feat'.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2024 10:02 pm
by Galfon
Sco must have felt they had a sniff after the third ball, but that's some motoring by Head..
Best of 3 so still something to go at..
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:06 pm
by Galfon
Eng. determined to make a game of 2nd. Test -
collapsoville revisited..
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:09 pm
by Banquo
Galfon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:06 pm
Eng. determined to make a game of 2nd. Test -
collapsoville revisited..
did the hard yards yesterday, daft today
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:17 pm
by fivepointer
SL bowled much better this morning but that was some rank bad batting. Brook, in particular, was all at sea.
Ponting good value on comms. Regularly makes good points.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2024 4:24 pm
by Banquo
Not sure pope is getting his fields right.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2024 5:00 pm
by Banquo
doh....hull of a drop
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2024 5:18 pm
by Banquo
laudable to keep playing but this is letting sl back in
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 3:37 pm
by Banquo
Pretty careless stuff tbh tho SL have bowled well post day 1
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:22 pm
by Banquo
Average bowling to say the least. No consistency or even plan to bowl at Nissanka, and Popes field setting is pants, though tbh with this buffet, no field would be that great.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:44 pm
by Banquo
Pretty bad last 5 hours frankly.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:47 pm
by fivepointer
We've been mostly poor the last 2 days. Very little application when its mattered.