Billy Vunipola

Moderator: Puja

Peej
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Peej »

People are free to express their views. It does not mean they are free from criticism for them.

I too noticed all the Saffas standing, in what surely must be a coordinated thing. The religious reasoning is nothing but an excuse, for the many reasons of crass hypocrisy expressed by others (playing on Sundays, having tattoos, wearing two types of cloth etc).

The supposed hard-left Marxism of BLM is a complete windup from the right wing of British politics, designed to discredit them. That those same people retort with "all lives matter", yet don't give a shit about kids drowning in the Channel, shows them for what they really are
padprop
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by padprop »

Say what you want, pretty impressive we’ve managed to discuss all 3 things you shouldn’t talk about at the dinner table (Sex, religion, politics) in one thread.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17711
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Puja »

padprop wrote:Say what you want, pretty impressive we’ve managed to discuss all 3 things you shouldn’t talk about at the dinner table (Sex, religion, politics) in one thread.
Image

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6381
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Oakboy »

padprop wrote:Say what you want, pretty impressive we’ve managed to discuss all 3 things you shouldn’t talk about at the dinner table (Sex, religion, politics) in one thread.
Shit, I missed the sex. Can someone give me the thread number? :? :? :?
padprop
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by padprop »

Its all just a battle of ignorance anyway. The kneelers will say those standing are ignorant of the true plight that black people go through on a day to day basis and the statistics, and those standing will say those kneeling are ignorant of another set of statistics, religious clashes and political leanings.

I’m all for debate, but when it gravitates towards cancel culture just because someone has grown up in different circumstances and been exposed to different “facts” then it gets a bit silly.
padprop
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by padprop »

Puja wrote:
Raggs wrote:Think I've read/heard that the white saffers didn't do it because they'll only kneel for god.
I feel sorry for their poor wives/husbands.

Puja
Here you go
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1262
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by canta_brian »

padprop wrote:Its all just a battle of ignorance anyway. The kneelers will say those standing are ignorant of the true plight that black people go through on a day to day basis and the statistics, and those standing will say those kneeling are ignorant of another set of statistics, religious clashes and political leanings.

I’m all for debate, but when it gravitates towards cancel culture just because someone has grown up in different circumstances and been exposed to different “facts” then it gets a bit silly.
Cancel culture? Surely if there was anything to it we wouldn’t have heard of it?

Most people I have heard moaning about cancel culture do so on their radio or tv shows, or maybe in a best selling book.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by morepork »

And another pop culture phrase sneaks into common use. Cancel culture. Brilliant.
padprop
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by padprop »

morepork wrote:And another pop culture phrase sneaks into common use. Cancel culture. Brilliant.
Trigger warning next time please
padprop
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by padprop »

canta_brian wrote:
padprop wrote:Its all just a battle of ignorance anyway. The kneelers will say those standing are ignorant of the true plight that black people go through on a day to day basis and the statistics, and those standing will say those kneeling are ignorant of another set of statistics, religious clashes and political leanings.

I’m all for debate, but when it gravitates towards cancel culture just because someone has grown up in different circumstances and been exposed to different “facts” then it gets a bit silly.
Cancel culture? Surely if there was anything to it we wouldn’t have heard of it?

Most people I have heard moaning about cancel culture do so on their radio or tv shows, or maybe in a best selling book.
To be fair, if you were to be cancelled, talking about it on your own show or book is the only place you could do it, thats kind of the point
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by morepork »

padprop wrote:
morepork wrote:And another pop culture phrase sneaks into common use. Cancel culture. Brilliant.
Trigger warning next time please
Oooh, you bastard.
padprop
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by padprop »

Must say I’ve enjoyed the debates on this forum regarding this and the Exeter Chiefs. Glad to see it hasn’t gone the way of twitter, only healthy to have a mix of views
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by morepork »

Yeah...that mix of views requires some context sometimes...
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9198
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Which Tyler »

Puja wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:Rokoduguni also failed to take a knee.
He had a far better rationale IMO
What was it, out of interest?
Sorry for the delay. He chose to stand to attention and salute instead.
He just felt that, as a serving soldier, it was a more appropriate sign of respect and support, than taking a knee.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by morepork »

Which Tyler wrote:
Puja wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:Rokoduguni also failed to take a knee.
He had a far better rationale IMO
What was it, out of interest?
Sorry for the delay. He chose to stand to attention and salute instead.
He just felt that, as a serving soldier, it was a more appropriate sign of respect and support, than taking a knee.

Ah. My knee jerk response was “bit of an own goal”, but then remembered that the UK, unlike the USA, doesn’t have national anthem and flag porn at events ranging from drinking games to international sporting fixtures.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17711
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Puja »

Which Tyler wrote:
Puja wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:Rokoduguni also failed to take a knee.
He had a far better rationale IMO
What was it, out of interest?
Sorry for the delay. He chose to stand to attention and salute instead.
He just felt that, as a serving soldier, it was a more appropriate sign of respect and support, than taking a knee.
Can't fault his reasoning.

Puja
Backist Monk
Cameo
Posts: 2994
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Cameo »

I don't have much to add. I would say that Vunipola's original comment:

“Man was made for woman to pro create that was the goal no?”

Negates any sympathy I have for any of his defences re religious beliefs etc. He can believe what he likes but this comment is just crass and objectionably. Apart from anything else, if that is the only goal and we should ignore human happiness, love and anything that goes with it, then I hope he has at least 10 kids by now.
Peej
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Peej »

Puja wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:
Puja wrote:
What was it, out of interest?
Sorry for the delay. He chose to stand to attention and salute instead.
He just felt that, as a serving soldier, it was a more appropriate sign of respect and support, than taking a knee.
Can't fault his reasoning.

Puja
As a serving soldier he is also expressly forbidden from engaging in political acts such as knee-taking anyway, regardless of his personal opinions
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9198
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Which Tyler »

Peej wrote:
Puja wrote:
Which Tyler wrote: Sorry for the delay. He chose to stand to attention and salute instead.
He just felt that, as a serving soldier, it was a more appropriate sign of respect and support, than taking a knee.
Can't fault his reasoning.

Puja
As a serving soldier he is also expressly forbidden from engaging in political acts such as knee-taking anyway, regardless of his personal opinions
Didn't think of that bit - how does his standing to attention and saluting fit in?
Peej
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Peej »

Saluting during a moment's silence is not a political act, I guess?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by morepork »

Then why did he do it?
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Digby »

The army had advised staff that kneeling would be overly political a move, leaving open I suppose the standing to attention and saluting option if they weren't instructed about that. Whether the advice to staff was based on when they're in uniform I don't know. Any which way I don't have an issue with what Roko did
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by morepork »

Well, as long as you are happy then. :/
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17711
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Puja »

Digby wrote:The army had advised staff that kneeling would be overly political a move, leaving open I suppose the standing to attention and saluting option if they weren't instructed about that. Whether the advice to staff was based on when they're in uniform I don't know. Any which way I don't have an issue with what Roko did
It seems like an odd directive, especially since not kneeling in a situation where most are is also a fairly political move as well. Still, sounds like Roko found a good space within the wording of his orders and well done for him.

Puja
Backist Monk
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Billy Vunipola

Post by Digby »

Grannypants making the point that death threats aimed at players, specifically his team mates, not taking a knee is rather misunderstanding the movement
Post Reply