Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
I'm doubtful in advance this one goes to trial. Nobody wants a trial in the main anyway 'cause the risk is much higher, and here the unions would be trying to stick it to some sympathetic plaintiffs a huge number of people think the unions should be helping whatever else has gone on.
Where on earth the money comes from isn't clear, maybe the game will be able to make annual payments rather than find it all upfront
Where on earth the money comes from isn't clear, maybe the game will be able to make annual payments rather than find it all upfront
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
Not searching for it now but rugby and the law Twitter account has a thread on this. Quite informative.
-
- Posts: 5908
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
see here -
well worth a read.
well worth a read.
-
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:42 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
THe Guardian has one up with ALix Popham now as well - similiar story to Steve Thompsons:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... ial-report
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... ial-report
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
Lipman, too.jimKRFC wrote:THe Guardian has one up with ALix Popham now as well - similiar story to Steve Thompsons:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... ial-report
They’re going all in.
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2461
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
Interestingly, yesterday all the headlines referred to "rugby" but they've now switched to "rugby union". #paranoia
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2020 2:14 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
Your experience sounds very similar to my experience. I struggle to remember where anything I have recently put down is, if I'm browsing Instagram and it prompts a thought to open an internet browser to look at something, if I don't do it immediately then it's a real struggle to recall why I opened it. One luxury that really helps me these days is having a car that the wing mirrors fold in when you lock the doors, convincing myself the car was locked before that was a nightmare!!Puja wrote:
Speaking as someone who has a similar, if less serious problem, that is exactly what it's like. I can tell you about a party that I went to 10 years ago, but I can't tell you any memories of my father. It's not linear or predictable and it is f*cking awful.
Puja
I am not sure how old you are, I'm 40. I only played rugby for a couple of years and at a low level. I don't attribute my mental difficulties with rugby. However, I am Scottish and enjoyed an active social life for 15 years or so with some top quality binge drinking. I am sure that rugby is a contributory factor to brain health but I am pretty sure that more damage would have been done to me through the weeks spent in the pubs & nightclubs than I did on the rugby pitch. I'd also be interested to know (I've never checked, just thought of it now) on what the effects are of heavy drinking whilst concussed.
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
And now from the ladies gameStom wrote:Lipman, too.jimKRFC wrote:THe Guardian has one up with ALix Popham now as well - similiar story to Steve Thompsons:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... ial-report
They’re going all in.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:54 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
That's a really good and fascinating point and it may be a get out for the unions. If there's any evidence that any of these guys got blatted after a head knock then it might be very difficult to ascribe responsibility for the dementia to the union/club etc... Morally repugnant I know. It reminds me of the asbestos situation where if you'd been exposed by one employer you could get something from them, but if you'd been exposed by two or more they just blamed the other. Don't know if that ever got sorted out properly....stevedog1980 wrote:
I am not sure how old you are, I'm 40. I only played rugby for a couple of years and at a low level. I don't attribute my mental difficulties with rugby. However, I am Scottish and enjoyed an active social life for 15 years or so with some top quality binge drinking. I am sure that rugby is a contributory factor to brain health but I am pretty sure that more damage would have been done to me through the weeks spent in the pubs & nightclubs than I did on the rugby pitch. I'd also be interested to know (I've never checked, just thought of it now) on what the effects are of heavy drinking whilst concussed.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
There's also now the fact that we live in a new world in terms of instant information. Our phones and internet browsing (you mention instagram), allow us to recover information instantly, without a requirement for recall or much memory work. That instant gratification effectively trains our brains to not need to check. In aspects of life without that, it can easily bleed through (did you lock the doors of the car), where we cannot get that instant knowledge.ad_tigger wrote:That's a really good and fascinating point and it may be a get out for the unions. If there's any evidence that any of these guys got blatted after a head knock then it might be very difficult to ascribe responsibility for the dementia to the union/club etc... Morally repugnant I know. It reminds me of the asbestos situation where if you'd been exposed by one employer you could get something from them, but if you'd been exposed by two or more they just blamed the other. Don't know if that ever got sorted out properly....stevedog1980 wrote:
I am not sure how old you are, I'm 40. I only played rugby for a couple of years and at a low level. I don't attribute my mental difficulties with rugby. However, I am Scottish and enjoyed an active social life for 15 years or so with some top quality binge drinking. I am sure that rugby is a contributory factor to brain health but I am pretty sure that more damage would have been done to me through the weeks spent in the pubs & nightclubs than I did on the rugby pitch. I'd also be interested to know (I've never checked, just thought of it now) on what the effects are of heavy drinking whilst concussed.
- Puja
- Posts: 17731
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
I'm 36 and have played through several concussions in my time. None recently, but I have definitely kept playing when somebody should have hauled me off, mostly because when I'm knocked stupid(er) I revert to the attitudes of my youth in rugby of "it's not that bad and it's weakness to come off". I don't know whether my memory issues are rugby related (kinda hard to prove anything with the brain), but I'd say it's likely.stevedog1980 wrote:Your experience sounds very similar to my experience. I struggle to remember where anything I have recently put down is, if I'm browsing Instagram and it prompts a thought to open an internet browser to look at something, if I don't do it immediately then it's a real struggle to recall why I opened it. One luxury that really helps me these days is having a car that the wing mirrors fold in when you lock the doors, convincing myself the car was locked before that was a nightmare!!Puja wrote:
Speaking as someone who has a similar, if less serious problem, that is exactly what it's like. I can tell you about a party that I went to 10 years ago, but I can't tell you any memories of my father. It's not linear or predictable and it is f*cking awful.
Puja
I am not sure how old you are, I'm 40. I only played rugby for a couple of years and at a low level. I don't attribute my mental difficulties with rugby. However, I am Scottish and enjoyed an active social life for 15 years or so with some top quality binge drinking. I am sure that rugby is a contributory factor to brain health but I am pretty sure that more damage would have been done to me through the weeks spent in the pubs & nightclubs than I did on the rugby pitch. I'd also be interested to know (I've never checked, just thought of it now) on what the effects are of heavy drinking whilst concussed.
To be clear, I don't blame any of my coaches and I don't want to sue anybody - it wasn't known about when I started playing and, while the culture of the time on head knocks looks appalling when looked at through today's values, it was as it was.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 2524
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
- Location: Haute-Garonne
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
An important consequence of this will be parents not wanting their children to take up rugby so without a shadow of doubt there’ll be far fewer players at club level in the next 10/15 years. Unless this problem is addressed quickly, our sport may cease to exist.
-
- Posts: 19200
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
Yep, it’s already happening I reckonfrancoisfou wrote:An important consequence of this will be parents not wanting their children to take up rugby so without a shadow of doubt there’ll be far fewer players at club level in the next 10/15 years. Unless this problem is addressed quickly, our sport may cease to exist.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
If we can't deal with the issue the sport should cease to exist
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:54 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
This is the live issue I have right now. My lad plays under 10s and while all the coaches take the issues very seriously fundamentally we don't actually know how to protect people's brains whilst they play rugby. I wouldn't stop him playing but I am worried for him especially as he adores the physical aspect. For me the ideal would be that he plays for as long as he enjoys it but finds something he likes even more to fill his time and keep him fit. One thing's for sure I wouldn't want him to play professional rugby without significant changes in culture and early diagnosis and mitigation of potential long term problems.Banquo wrote:Yep, it’s already happening I reckonfrancoisfou wrote:An important consequence of this will be parents not wanting their children to take up rugby so without a shadow of doubt there’ll be far fewer players at club level in the next 10/15 years. Unless this problem is addressed quickly, our sport may cease to exist.
It should be said that I speak from the perspective of playing through the age grades then doing other stuff at uni, a year of senior rugby and stopping with a torn hamstring that I didn't want to risk. I don't recall any concussions playing rugby but I did have a very serious one aged 14 (several hours of zero short term memory, night in hospital, never really got the previous 2 months of memories back) falling a long way off a rope swing and hitting my head. I read the Lipman piece and some of it rang true, mood swings, dodgy memory in places but I couldn't attribute that directly to the fall.
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2020 11:04 am
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
Yep, I'd agree with this. My son is 6 and started playing at the local club this year. He was very disappointed at first that it was non-contact! As with everyone in my family, there's probably no chance of him playing anywhere outside of the pack, and he's already more interested in smashing people (me) than playing catch or learning skills, despite my best efforts.ad_tigger wrote:This is the live issue I have right now. My lad plays under 10s and while all the coaches take the issues very seriously fundamentally we don't actually know how to protect people's brains whilst they play rugby. I wouldn't stop him playing but I am worried for him especially as he adores the physical aspect. For me the ideal would be that he plays for as long as he enjoys it but finds something he likes even more to fill his time and keep him fit. One thing's for sure I wouldn't want him to play professional rugby without significant changes in culture and early diagnosis and mitigation of potential long term problems.Banquo wrote:Yep, it’s already happening I reckonfrancoisfou wrote:An important consequence of this will be parents not wanting their children to take up rugby so without a shadow of doubt there’ll be far fewer players at club level in the next 10/15 years. Unless this problem is addressed quickly, our sport may cease to exist.
It should be said that I speak from the perspective of playing through the age grades then doing other stuff at uni, a year of senior rugby and stopping with a torn hamstring that I didn't want to risk. I don't recall any concussions playing rugby but I did have a very serious one aged 14 (several hours of zero short term memory, night in hospital, never really got the previous 2 months of memories back) falling a long way off a rope swing and hitting my head. I read the Lipman piece and some of it rang true, mood swings, dodgy memory in places but I couldn't attribute that directly to the fall.
Looking back at myself I think the last 2 or 3 years have certainly put a different spin on the dodgy knee that made it pretty much impossible to play from 16 onwards. And while I certainly hope the boy carries on with the game and enjoys it as much as and preferably for longer than I did, I sort of hope he doesn't get too good.
It also makes me wonder about my dad who played well into his late 30's as a tight head. While he's definitely all there, he forgets more than most people in their late 50's and his speech has got consistently more slurry in the last 10 years.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
We also have to remember though, that a lot of people now in their 40s and 50s have not benefitted from law and attitude changes, hell, even those in their 30s haven't really. To see the effects of the changes that have been implemented, it's the 20 year olds now that should show the benefits.
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
Just cancel contact sport, turn off the lights and close the door.
I’m sure the inventors of virtual sport can fill the void
I’m sure the inventors of virtual sport can fill the void
-
- Posts: 19200
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
That seems to be the almost inevitable direction of travel.p/d wrote:Just cancel contact sport, turn off the lights and close the door.
I’m sure the inventors of virtual sport can fill the void
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
Sadly so. But preferable to lining the pockets of money grabbing lawyersBanquo wrote:That seems to be the almost inevitable direction of travel.p/d wrote:Just cancel contact sport, turn off the lights and close the door.
I’m sure the inventors of virtual sport can fill the void
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
Let’s hope the ology was neurobiology.p/d wrote:And now from the ladies gameStom wrote:Lipman, too.jimKRFC wrote:THe Guardian has one up with ALix Popham now as well - similiar story to Steve Thompsons:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... ial-report
They’re going all in.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
40 is insanely young for dementia. That is in the region of rare dominant negative heritable forms of Alzheimer's would struggle to kick in that young. Outside of that, I don't think there is a sporadic (non-heritable) form of disease-associated dementia that comes even close to being that aggressive. There is a big neurobiology fundamental just waiting to be found in there somewhere.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
There's a charming combination here of snowflake meets grumpy old manp/d wrote:Sadly so. But preferable to lining the pockets of money grabbing lawyersBanquo wrote:That seems to be the almost inevitable direction of travel.p/d wrote:Just cancel contact sport, turn off the lights and close the door.
I’m sure the inventors of virtual sport can fill the void
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2020 8:23 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
I'd love to see the pleadings on this in due course. Agree with the reasoning that sticking them back on without being too concerned about their welfare is a triable issue but not against WR surely?
The clubs and unions yes and bear in mind there is an employer/employee relationship there that would give the players additional clout.
The clubs and unions yes and bear in mind there is an employer/employee relationship there that would give the players additional clout.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Major Unions facing a head injuries law suit
Some observations:
1. Concussion is a serious brain injury. Everyone knew that. That's why there was a mandatory stand down period even when I was a kid in the 80s and 90s.
2. It follows that it's very difficult for Unions or clubs to say "we didn't know that there was any issue".
3. The decrease in the stand down period whether for professionals or others was pretty clearly unjustifiable, either on the basis that everyone knew here were risks, or that the risks weren't well enough known to decrease the protections that exist.
4. You can't exclude liability for personal injury.
5. "You knew the risks" really doesn't work in combination with "we didn't know there was an issue". The moment any club or Union says "You knew the risks" they are accepting that they did as well.
6. "You knew the risks" can only ever amount to contributory negligence, not a defence.
7. You don't need to anticipate the precise injury which eventuates to be liable, so the fact that no one knew about CTE isn't going to save them from suit.
1. Concussion is a serious brain injury. Everyone knew that. That's why there was a mandatory stand down period even when I was a kid in the 80s and 90s.
2. It follows that it's very difficult for Unions or clubs to say "we didn't know that there was any issue".
3. The decrease in the stand down period whether for professionals or others was pretty clearly unjustifiable, either on the basis that everyone knew here were risks, or that the risks weren't well enough known to decrease the protections that exist.
4. You can't exclude liability for personal injury.
5. "You knew the risks" really doesn't work in combination with "we didn't know there was an issue". The moment any club or Union says "You knew the risks" they are accepting that they did as well.
6. "You knew the risks" can only ever amount to contributory negligence, not a defence.
7. You don't need to anticipate the precise injury which eventuates to be liable, so the fact that no one knew about CTE isn't going to save them from suit.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.