Page 3 of 4
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 12:03 pm
by Mellsblue
Banquo wrote:did they buy his contract out?
sfunny how fortunes change- George was AP Player of the year last year, and Mike was Guinness DOR of the year!
If you live by the Ford you die by the Ford.
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 12:07 pm
by Banquo
Mellsblue wrote:Banquo wrote:did they buy his contract out?
sfunny how fortunes change- George was AP Player of the year last year, and Mike was Guinness DOR of the year!
If you live by the Ford you die by the Ford.
not sure how Farrell the nepotism gets you
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 12:44 pm
by Puja
Banquo wrote:Mellsblue wrote:Banquo wrote:did they buy his contract out?
sfunny how fortunes change- George was AP Player of the year last year, and Mike was Guinness DOR of the year!
If you live by the Ford you die by the Ford.
not sure how Farrell the nepotism gets you
You're likely to end up Myler less where you started from.
Puja
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 1:32 pm
by iLovett
Ford Jr can come to Saints if he fancies a change... Ford Sr can stay away though
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 1:46 pm
by Banquo
Puja wrote:Banquo wrote:Mellsblue wrote:
If you live by the Ford you die by the Ford.
not sure how Farrell the nepotism gets you
You're likely to end up Myler less where you started from.
Puja
Good Evans. that's enough!
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 1:49 pm
by Digby
Banquo wrote:Puja wrote:Banquo wrote:
not sure how Farrell the nepotism gets you
You're likely to end up Myler less where you started from.
Puja
Good Evans. that's enough!
It's all Goode
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 1:54 pm
by Banquo
Digby wrote:Banquo wrote:Puja wrote:
You're likely to end up Myler less where you started from.
Puja
Good Evans. that's enough!
It's all Goode
Wilko
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 2:20 pm
by Puja
Banquo wrote:Puja wrote:Banquo wrote:
not sure how Farrell the nepotism gets you
You're likely to end up Myler less where you started from.
Puja
Good Evans. that's enough!
You're probably right. Don't want to get Burnsed.
Puja
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:37 pm
by Digby
This is proving a Steyn on the board
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:41 pm
by Banquo
Digby wrote:This is proving a Steyn on the board
Morne, morne, morne all you do these days.
Romeu wasn't built in a day, after all
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:44 pm
by Hucks
Tales to stop & we'll stop
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:47 pm
by Banquo
Hucks wrote:Tales to stop & we'll stop
Good debut work! Welcome.....you don't Fox us, you've been on before?
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:48 pm
by Digby
Hucks wrote:Tales to stop & we'll stop
To stop now would be a Foley
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 3:58 pm
by Banquo
Digby wrote:Hucks wrote:Tales to stop & we'll stop
To stop now would be a Foley
Don't put off today, what you can put off til Toomua.
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:09 pm
by Hucks
this thread started well but it's turning pretty honnibal.
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:12 pm
by Mellsblue
Hucks wrote:this thread started well but it's turning pretty honnibal.
I agree, it's been Butch-ered........that was an awful pun so I'll leave......home, James.
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:21 pm
by morepork
Sweet Jesus.
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:28 pm
by Dacre
There are lots of rumours that it was more than the on field performance that was the reason for Ford leaving
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:30 pm
by Banquo
Dacre wrote:There are lots of rumours that it was more than the on field performance that was the reason for Ford leaving
There was a damning piece of consultancy work done, which is what did for him is what I read. Players and other management were less than complementary, apparently.
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:31 pm
by Banquo
Mellsblue wrote:Hucks wrote:this thread started well but it's turning pretty honnibal.
I agree, it's been Butch-ered........that was an awful pun so I'll leave......home, James.
Think you missed the Botha. Still, any Porta in a storm...
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:35 pm
by Dacre
Banquo wrote:Dacre wrote:There are lots of rumours that it was more than the on field performance that was the reason for Ford leaving
There was a damning piece of consultancy work done, which is what did for him is what I read. Players and other management were less than complementary, apparently.
More of a personal nature!
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:38 pm
by Digby
Hucks wrote:this thread started well but it's turning pretty honnibal.
The delivery started off well enough, but it would now seem there's a collective case of the Jeeps
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:39 pm
by Digby
Dacre wrote:Banquo wrote:Dacre wrote:There are lots of rumours that it was more than the on field performance that was the reason for Ford leaving
There was a damning piece of consultancy work done, which is what did for him is what I read. Players and other management were less than complementary, apparently.
More of a personal nature!
It's a problem for his family, not much of one for Bath.
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:41 pm
by Banquo
Digby wrote:Hucks wrote:this thread started well but it's turning pretty honnibal.
The delivery started off well enough, but it would now seem there's a collective case of the Jeeps
expanding to scrum halves....can I ap-Peel?
Re: Ford.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:41 pm
by Banquo
Dacre wrote:Banquo wrote:Dacre wrote:There are lots of rumours that it was more than the on field performance that was the reason for Ford leaving
There was a damning piece of consultancy work done, which is what did for him is what I read. Players and other management were less than complementary, apparently.
More of a personal nature!
ah ok.