Lions
Moderator: OptimisticJock
- Tobylerone
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:15 pm
Re: Lions
Done now.. Let`s just hope they both come back with their arms and legs in correct alignment..
- Chunks Baws
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 am
Re: Lions
I feel sorry for any Scots that have coughed up a lot of dosh to go to NZ. Imagine spending a few weeks having to listen to all the chippy Welsh pricks.
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Lions
Quality manipulation of stats. Seems reasonable to me.whatisthejava wrote:you can manipulate the stats anyway you want (i did) the fact remains that at either international or European level most of those guys have lost to players deemed not good enough,hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Java you seem quite content to use the Sarries v Glasgow game to support your argument for English players. Could you please re-calculate using the Munster results against Glasgow from Europe?
i could come up with lots of stats to say the welsh deserved their high numbers but its pretty much bullsh!t, its an interesting stat that demonstrates the fact the coaches picked who they wanted to go with ,
The welsh media have already turned round and said that the only way to beat the blacks is to bash them into submission, whatever you do dont tell the irish
Also agree, the Oirish did actually win those games.
- Edinburgh in Exile
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:52 am
Re: Lions
Aye, deliberate or not that rod for our back was subsequently used to beat us.Wylie Coyote wrote:Aye "offered" as in asking our national coach Townsend to be ROBERT HOWLEY's assistant? That was a clear insult in an of itself. It is as if Gatland has gone out of his way to destroy the Lions concept as far as Scottish rugby is concerned.bruce wrote:When push comes to shove, coaches are going fall on the side of players they know. No Scottish representation in the coaching team (although it was offered), is probably the main reason there isn't more Scots in the squad.
-
- Posts: 5579
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Lions
Not many Scots on last few tours and all supporters I know who have been from up here loved every minute of the tour.Chunks Baws wrote:I feel sorry for any Scots that have coughed up a lot of dosh to go to NZ. Imagine spending a few weeks having to listen to all the chippy Welsh pricks.
- Edinburgh in Exile
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:52 am
Re: Lions
I agree with D. The tours are great. The Welsh traditionally make up the bulk of the traveling support, they are deadly. It's all too easy to confuse the Internet with what people are like. Some fat cunt, 40 year old man child posting with a "internet persona" isn't a fair reflection of anything.Chunks Baws wrote:I feel sorry for any Scots that have coughed up a lot of dosh to go to NZ. Imagine spending a few weeks having to listen to all the chippy Welsh pricks.
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:30 pm
Re: Lions
I was waiting for a "...but enough about me" at the end there.Edinburgh in Exile wrote:I agree with D. The tours are great. The Welsh traditionally make up the bulk of the traveling support, they are deadly. It's all too easy to confuse the Internet with what people are like. Some fat cunt, 40 year old man child posting with a "internet persona" isn't a fair reflection of anything.Chunks Baws wrote:I feel sorry for any Scots that have coughed up a lot of dosh to go to NZ. Imagine spending a few weeks having to listen to all the chippy Welsh pricks.
As for the touring party:
Iain Henderson
Can someone explain that to me? I've tried using logic and I'm not getting anywhere.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:54 pm
Re: Lions
Henderson & a barely fit George Kruis who hasn't played international rugby this year + Courtney Lawes were all 50:50 or less, versus Grays & Launchbury. 3 unlucky locks, 2 out of 3 are Scots.QwentyJ wrote:I was waiting for a "...but enough about me" at the end there.Edinburgh in Exile wrote:I agree with D. The tours are great. The Welsh traditionally make up the bulk of the traveling support, they are deadly. It's all too easy to confuse the Internet with what people are like. Some fat cunt, 40 year old man child posting with a "internet persona" isn't a fair reflection of anything.Chunks Baws wrote:I feel sorry for any Scots that have coughed up a lot of dosh to go to NZ. Imagine spending a few weeks having to listen to all the chippy Welsh pricks.
As for the touring party:
Iain Henderson
Can someone explain that to me? I've tried using logic and I'm not getting anywhere.
- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: Lions
Indeed. It would much better to go to Weston Super Mare which is full of them between May and September. Similar climate also.Chunks Baws wrote:I feel sorry for any Scots that have coughed up a lot of dosh to go to NZ. Imagine spending a few weeks having to listen to all the chippy Welsh pricks.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Lions
Could have taken Richie G to help with that.Big D wrote:Looking at the squad. ADJ probably has to go. Very little Lions experience in that tight 5. 2 and a half tours without him in there.
Actually, very few previous tourists in the forwards.
You boys have been screwed. Taking Irishmen over your boys is justifiable. taking Englishmen over your boys is certainly justifiable. Taking Welshmen just isn't.
Have a look at the funny balance of the team. 3 full backs when you've got the likes of Daly and Payne who can also play there? Oh look one of them is 1/2p who doesn't even vaguely deserve his slot. Shit loads of centres? Oh look there's JD2 who doesn't even vaguely deserve his slot. Shit loads of back rowers? Oh look there's Moriarty who appears to have got his slot on the basis of 60 minutes against England. I reckon the WRU have insisted he picks a quota of welshmen.
FFS.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
I dont buy that few tourists, some guys have 50 - 60 caps and sometimes like England under RObshaw you have to wipe the slate clean and build itEugene Wrayburn wrote:Could have taken Richie G to help with that.Big D wrote:Looking at the squad. ADJ probably has to go. Very little Lions experience in that tight 5. 2 and a half tours without him in there.
Actually, very few previous tourists in the forwards.
You boys have been screwed. Taking Irishmen over your boys is justifiable. taking Englishmen over your boys is certainly justifiable. Taking Welshmen just isn't.
Have a look at the funny balance of the team. 3 full backs when you've got the likes of Daly and Payne who can also play there? Oh look one of them is 1/2p who doesn't even vaguely deserve his slot. Shit loads of centres? Oh look there's JD2 who doesn't even vaguely deserve his slot. Shit loads of back rowers? Oh look there's Moriarty who appears to have got his slot on the basis of 60 minutes against England. I reckon the WRU have insisted he picks a quota of welshmen.
FFS.
I think the most interesting thing is Telfer has come out and ripped into them, telfer has never been shy about telling the world how sh!t scotland players are but he is now,
my predictions is a squad split, not alot of love between the home nations but some english boys will quite rightly look at Henderson and AWJ and ask how the feck are you here
some of the centres will look at JD and ask how the feck are you here
some of the wings will be asking how 1/2p is there
most people will be wondering how Moriarty got there
The schedule is a disaster, many players picked who were exremly lucky to tour, a bad game plan which cant work against the all blacks, is it me or is this just another repeat of 2005 which means alot of hand ringing by the blazerati in 4 years and another need to pick a safe pair of hands to rebuild the lions,
And i think most of all its another wasted chance to take on the kiwis, the lions blazerati need to go, well done you were the invincibles but now your old crusty men and f**k off. Time for some leadership in the lions with experiance in the pro game who have watched successive tours be used in a selfish way to benefit welsh rugby at the expense of the other home nations.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
No they won't.whatisthejava wrote:my predictions is a squad split, not alot of love between the home nations but some english boys will quite rightly look at Henderson and AWJ and ask how the feck are you hereEugene Wrayburn wrote:Could have taken Richie G to help with that.Big D wrote:Looking at the squad. ADJ probably has to go. Very little Lions experience in that tight 5. 2 and a half tours without him in there.
Actually, very few previous tourists in the forwards.
You boys have been screwed. Taking Irishmen over your boys is justifiable. taking Englishmen over your boys is certainly justifiable. Taking Welshmen just isn't.
Have a look at the funny balance of the team. 3 full backs when you've got the likes of Daly and Payne who can also play there? Oh look one of them is 1/2p who doesn't even vaguely deserve his slot. Shit loads of centres? Oh look there's JD2 who doesn't even vaguely deserve his slot. Shit loads of back rowers? Oh look there's Moriarty who appears to have got his slot on the basis of 60 minutes against England. I reckon the WRU have insisted he picks a quota of welshmen.
FFS.
some of the centres will look at JD and ask how the feck are you here
some of the wings will be asking how 1/2p is there
most people will be wondering how Moriarty got there
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Quite alot of lions squads have splits (some big, some small), its only the last 2 that have not had big ones although that was prob down to certain players keeping quite rather than speakign out
Interesting Shanklin thinks we lack individual skills http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/39648292
Strange how we outtackled, out rucked, out thought and out passed them
Interesting Shanklin thinks we lack individual skills http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/39648292
Strange how we outtackled, out rucked, out thought and out passed them
-
- Posts: 12013
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Lions
Yes, that's a very strange interpretation.
Were you aware that Dan Biggar doesn't like losing though?
Were you aware that Dan Biggar doesn't like losing though?
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm
Re: Lions
I have no doubt that Gatland and Co feel that they have picked the squad to give them the best possible chance of being competitive against the Soup sides and the ABs.
I think that due to the preposterous scheduling and difficulty of the itinerary, that they will have thought long and hard about availability and squad familiarity. On availability: Payne, Moriarty, Henderson, Teo, and some of the home based Welsh players may well have been picked as it is deemed unlikely they will be involved in the business end of the domestic or European tournaments. You could say the same for Scottish players but that's perhaps where the familiarity bit comes in.
To be clear I don't like it and would have rather have a fuller Scottish representation. It is what it is. I'll still be looking for the Lions to do something special in NZ as they are massive underdogs. I like an underdog story and and it would be the sporting result of the year if they were able to nick a Test series in NZ, however unlikely that may be. And I do think its very unlikely.
Meanwhile Toony can get on with putting across his vision to the squad and making us better. Lets finish in the top half of the 6N next year, beat the Welsh in Cardiff and Italy in Rome. Beat England and France at home. And O'Halloran and later Rennie can get to work on a decent pre-season to make Glasgow more competitive next year. That's what I'm focused on in rugby.
Meanwhile the SRU picks up somewhere in the region of £2m as its financial dividend from Lions Tour profits. As an equal shareholder, there is a straight split four ways between the home unions, irrespective of player representation. And we wont have the same impact on our clubs and national side in the first half of next year.
Oh and congrats and good luck to Hogg and Seymour. I hope they shine. They have the quality and character to have great tours.
I think that due to the preposterous scheduling and difficulty of the itinerary, that they will have thought long and hard about availability and squad familiarity. On availability: Payne, Moriarty, Henderson, Teo, and some of the home based Welsh players may well have been picked as it is deemed unlikely they will be involved in the business end of the domestic or European tournaments. You could say the same for Scottish players but that's perhaps where the familiarity bit comes in.
To be clear I don't like it and would have rather have a fuller Scottish representation. It is what it is. I'll still be looking for the Lions to do something special in NZ as they are massive underdogs. I like an underdog story and and it would be the sporting result of the year if they were able to nick a Test series in NZ, however unlikely that may be. And I do think its very unlikely.
Meanwhile Toony can get on with putting across his vision to the squad and making us better. Lets finish in the top half of the 6N next year, beat the Welsh in Cardiff and Italy in Rome. Beat England and France at home. And O'Halloran and later Rennie can get to work on a decent pre-season to make Glasgow more competitive next year. That's what I'm focused on in rugby.
Meanwhile the SRU picks up somewhere in the region of £2m as its financial dividend from Lions Tour profits. As an equal shareholder, there is a straight split four ways between the home unions, irrespective of player representation. And we wont have the same impact on our clubs and national side in the first half of next year.
Oh and congrats and good luck to Hogg and Seymour. I hope they shine. They have the quality and character to have great tours.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Lions
True, but they also get paid per player, and so the WRU who release Gats for such service will pick up £840k compared to the SRU who'll get just £140k. In a lot of organisations that'd be considered a conflict of interest, not here it seemsARM wrote:
Meanwhile the SRU picks up somewhere in the region of £2m as its financial dividend from Lions Tour profits. As an equal shareholder, there is a straight split four ways between the home unions, irrespective of player representation. And we wont have the same impact on our clubs and national side in the first half of next year.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
Why? They lose them for a fair chunk of the season as they need to recover. There will be a broken players too.Digby wrote:True, but they also get paid per player, and so the WRU who release Gats for such service will pick up £840k compared to the SRU who'll get just £140k. In a lot of organisations that'd be considered a conflict of interest, not here it seemsARM wrote:
Meanwhile the SRU picks up somewhere in the region of £2m as its financial dividend from Lions Tour profits. As an equal shareholder, there is a straight split four ways between the home unions, irrespective of player representation. And we wont have the same impact on our clubs and national side in the first half of next year.
- BBD
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am
Re: Lions
As we have seen previously, a few of those selected will be unlucky enough to pick up injuries before the season ends and during the tour that will mean replacements flying out to join the squad. Who knows we may even have a Hartleyesque ban before the tour. The 41 selected so far certainly won't be unscathed
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: Lions
... or a Quinny-esque?BBD wrote:Who knows we may even have a Hartleyesque ban before the tour.
Is anyone opening the book?
My money would be on anyone from the Ospreys or Scarlets who will be having to kick lumps off each other in 3 weeks to secure a Pro12 play-off slot.
Idle Feck
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
i think the thing that sticks the most for scots is for the last 3 tours the excuse has been well your not winning so we dont need to look at individual performances, now its well who cares about your team winning because man on man your not as good as the welsh.BBD wrote:As we have seen previously, a few of those selected will be unlucky enough to pick up injuries before the season ends and during the tour that will mean replacements flying out to join the squad. Who knows we may even have a Hartleyesque ban before the tour. The 41 selected so far certainly won't be unscathed
Supposedly AWJ is 50/50 to go but then i still think your looking at DOR before Jonny Gray
Connor Murray may not be right yet
Warburton may not even play as he may not fully recover so sooner or later they will make a call there
I think before the tour even leaves 2 - 3 players will take another knock which means they are out but I think even now i cant think of a single player who is definitely next choice, the scots just dont really fit gatball
1 - Gats will take a welsh loosie
2 - Possibly Brown
3 - Samson lee
4 - Chateris
5 - DOR
6 Robshaw (remember Rowntree been working with Quins)
7 Haskell,
8 Heaslip - (wasps 8)
9 Care - LLoyd Williams
10 Ford - Russel
11 Zebo
12 Roberts - Williams
13 Ringrose
14 Maitland
15 Brown
And even then you could argue 1 - 2 players ahead of a scot