Re: Eddie Jones' Phase 2 (Backs)
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:20 pm
Yeah, linebreaker, fair enough.
Its what I really want to see from a 12- Nonu probably the best example, capable of trucking and stepping. And passing. Who knewMikey Brown wrote:Yeah, linebreaker, fair enough.
... wait, how was Te'o at any fault for the Italy game? Actually, what did he even do wrong?Mikey Brown wrote:He's the reverse Burt in every sense then. Claiming he wants a basher at 12 then going with a playmaker.
I really see very little merit in putting Teo at 13 but you have me worried now. That Italy game was just horrifying. If Francis/Slade/Devoto played like that at 12 they would be cast out the same as Burrell was.
Reading that back it's not so clear I was talking about Farrell. I was running on the assumption that the only purpose of moving Teo to 13 is to accommodate the ice-cream man at 12, which I don't see the point in. It wasn't particularly a jab at Teo.Peat wrote:... wait, how was Te'o at any fault for the Italy game? Actually, what did he even do wrong?Mikey Brown wrote:He's the reverse Burt in every sense then. Claiming he wants a basher at 12 then going with a playmaker.
I really see very little merit in putting Teo at 13 but you have me worried now. That Italy game was just horrifying. If Francis/Slade/Devoto played like that at 12 they would be cast out the same as Burrell was.
Oh right. With you now.Mikey Brown wrote:Reading that back it's not so clear I was talking about Farrell. I was running on the assumption that the only purpose of moving Teo to 13 is to accommodate the ice-cream man at 12, which I don't see the point in. It wasn't particularly a jab at Teo.Peat wrote:... wait, how was Te'o at any fault for the Italy game? Actually, what did he even do wrong?Mikey Brown wrote:He's the reverse Burt in every sense then. Claiming he wants a basher at 12 then going with a playmaker.
I really see very little merit in putting Teo at 13 but you have me worried now. That Italy game was just horrifying. If Francis/Slade/Devoto played like that at 12 they would be cast out the same as Burrell was.
Ice man? corrupted?Peat wrote:Oh right. With you now.Mikey Brown wrote:Reading that back it's not so clear I was talking about Farrell. I was running on the assumption that the only purpose of moving Teo to 13 is to accommodate the ice-cream man at 12, which I don't see the point in. It wasn't particularly a jab at Teo.Peat wrote:
... wait, how was Te'o at any fault for the Italy game? Actually, what did he even do wrong?
Dare I ask why Farrell is the ice cream man?
Banquo wrote:Ice man? corrupted?Peat wrote:Oh right. With you now.Mikey Brown wrote:
Reading that back it's not so clear I was talking about Farrell. I was running on the assumption that the only purpose of moving Teo to 13 is to accommodate the ice-cream man at 12, which I don't see the point in. It wasn't particularly a jab at Teo.
Dare I ask why Farrell is the ice cream man?
Or does he run through Walls?
HeheOakboy wrote:I thought it was because he looks like he's excreting one in his place-kick build-up.
Nevermind ice cream, man looks like he's excreting a concrete sculpture of a full roast dinner out there. While considering murdering puppies.Oakboy wrote:I thought it was because he looks like he's excreting one in his place-kick build-up.
You suck the pun out of every thread....Mikey Brown wrote:Oh yay. Puns. My fave.
I think you should quip while you're ahead.Banquo wrote:You suck the pun out of every thread....Mikey Brown wrote:Oh yay. Puns. My fave.