Re: England squad for start of 6N’s
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2019 10:29 am
Does Eddie mean more btw than Nowell would be the blindside winger where possible?
This actually makes a lot of sense to me…Digby wrote:Does Eddie mean more btw than Nowell would be the blindside winger where possible?
Tl;dr Nowell has some talent but isn’t a particularly good winger.Renniks wrote:This actually makes a lot of sense to me…Digby wrote:Does Eddie mean more btw than Nowell would be the blindside winger where possible?
Give Daly / May / Watson lots of space to attack, and they have the pace to defend the wider channel
Give Nowell / ???? the tighter spaces to break through (he does this well), and less space to defend (no being burnt on the outside)
Where does Big Joe fit? He almost certainly could do a job in tight spaces… but is absolutely lethal when given lots of space too
Not having pace in the backs frequently sets us apart from other sidesRenniks wrote:I don't want my FB (or arguably, my wingers) to have those attributes though…
That's why I don't completely dislike this potential idea of a blindside winger - because Nowell, and Brown, are definitely good players. So find a role that works for them… It also might set us apart from other teams for a bit
As long as he has pace with a couple of players (May and Daly, say), Jones seems to set more store by power/size (Farrell, Coka, Tuilagi, T'eo). Somehow, he never gets the balance right. Maybe, he should just opt for skill (Cipriani).Digby wrote:Not having pace in the backs frequently sets us apart from other sidesRenniks wrote:I don't want my FB (or arguably, my wingers) to have those attributes though…
That's why I don't completely dislike this potential idea of a blindside winger - because Nowell, and Brown, are definitely good players. So find a role that works for them… It also might set us apart from other teams for a bit
I din't see the press conference but he's just having a bit of fun I think.Digby wrote:Does Eddie mean more btw than Nowell would be the blindside winger where possible?
Almost certainly so, nonetheless technically how it might work is of interest to me, but then I'm not very interestingtwitchy wrote:I din't see the press conference but he's juts having a bit of fun I think.Digby wrote:Does Eddie mean more btw than Nowell would be the blindside winger where possible?
Agree. Browny copped a lot of flack from the back play purists, when I saw him as a highly competent, tough, fast enough full back. he knew the way to the line as well.Stom wrote:Nowell has a lot of similarities with another England player a lot of people have shat on for many years...
Mike Brown.
- Not the quickest outside back but not as slow as made out.
- Strong in contact with good leg drive
- Doesn't often pass, but still makes a lot of assists due to breaking through the first line of defense but not being able to finish on his own
- Can get done on the outside when defending a wing
- Tenacious and doesn't give up
- A very hard worker
Seriously, stick him at FB, not Daly.
Copped?richy678 wrote:Agree. Browny copped a lot of flack from the back play purists, when I saw him as a highly competent, tough, fast enough full back. he knew the way to the line as well.Stom wrote:Nowell has a lot of similarities with another England player a lot of people have shat on for many years...
Mike Brown.
- Not the quickest outside back but not as slow as made out.
- Strong in contact with good leg drive
- Doesn't often pass, but still makes a lot of assists due to breaking through the first line of defense but not being able to finish on his own
- Can get done on the outside when defending a wing
- Tenacious and doesn't give up
- A very hard worker
Seriously, stick him at FB, not Daly.
He can go and get stuck in at the rucks again then.Stom wrote:Copped?richy678 wrote:Agree. Browny copped a lot of flack from the back play purists, when I saw him as a highly competent, tough, fast enough full back. he knew the way to the line as well.Stom wrote:Nowell has a lot of similarities with another England player a lot of people have shat on for many years...
Mike Brown.
- Not the quickest outside back but not as slow as made out.
- Strong in contact with good leg drive
- Doesn't often pass, but still makes a lot of assists due to breaking through the first line of defense but not being able to finish on his own
- Can get done on the outside when defending a wing
- Tenacious and doesn't give up
- A very hard worker
Seriously, stick him at FB, not Daly.
Saw?
Knew?
Don't you mean
Cops?
See?
Know?
He's back and he's going to play for England! And he's playing damn well for Quins. Got his mojo back and his hair...Though it's harder to tell it's him now
Not really.Digby wrote:Not having pace in the backs frequently sets us apart from other sidesRenniks wrote:I don't want my FB (or arguably, my wingers) to have those attributes though…
That's why I don't completely dislike this potential idea of a blindside winger - because Nowell, and Brown, are definitely good players. So find a role that works for them… It also might set us apart from other teams for a bit
Tbh I did wonder about adding the Scotland caveat, though in our case we often have more choiceTimbo wrote:Not really.Digby wrote:Not having pace in the backs frequently sets us apart from other sidesRenniks wrote:I don't want my FB (or arguably, my wingers) to have those attributes though…
That's why I don't completely dislike this potential idea of a blindside winger - because Nowell, and Brown, are definitely good players. So find a role that works for them… It also might set us apart from other teams for a bit
You really think that England have frequently picked particularly slow back lines when compared to other teams?Digby wrote:Tbh I did wonder about adding the Scotland caveat, though in our case we often have more choiceTimbo wrote:Not really.Digby wrote:
Not having pace in the backs frequently sets us apart from other sides
Amen to that. Wouldn’t bother me if Daly only made the bench. A 15 he ain’tStom wrote:
Seriously, stick him at FB, not Daly.
I really think we've picked slower backlines than we ought to have, I don't really care about other sidesTimbo wrote:You really think that England have frequently picked particularly slow back lines when compared to other teams?Digby wrote:Tbh I did wonder about adding the Scotland caveat, though in our case we often have more choiceTimbo wrote:
Not really.
He's shown that he's a good wing. Daly/May are probably England's best wing pairing.p/d wrote:Amen to that. Wouldn’t bother me if Daly only made the bench. A 15 he ain’tStom wrote:
Seriously, stick him at FB, not Daly.
Yep, you are probably right. Just feel the competition for those berths is healthy enough that a place on the bench isn’t necessarily a bad thingSpiffy wrote:He's shown that he's a good wing. Daly/May are probably England's best wing pairing.p/d wrote:Amen to that. Wouldn’t bother me if Daly only made the bench. A 15 he ain’tStom wrote:
Seriously, stick him at FB, not Daly.
IF Daly recovers his full form and confidence you are right. For Dublin will he have, though? Jones is entirely to blame for wasting his time at FB and, basically, buggering him up.Spiffy wrote:He's shown that he's a good wing. Daly/May are probably England's best wing pairing.p/d wrote:Amen to that. Wouldn’t bother me if Daly only made the bench. A 15 he ain’tStom wrote:
Seriously, stick him at FB, not Daly.
But we do have FBs. It's just Eddie didn't want Mike Brown for some reason...twitchy wrote:It's bizarre how few full backs we have. We shouldn't need to be converting players from other positions.
Englands problem has always been at 12. We've had the odd one or two that could play 2nd 5/8th and do the modern physical bit.twitchy wrote:It's bizarre how few full backs we have. We shouldn't need to be converting players from other positions.