RugbyRebels

Scully did not look okay getting up after tackling JC. Hope he's alright. Definitely seems the sort to fight through an injury.

Don't want to start you lot off but in an alternate universe Ford would be England's Mr Reliable star player and Farrell would be a good bench option who can cover 12

What is it with these infuriating penalties. Just fu*king dumb.

They collapsed their own maul didn't they?

Cameo wrote:Don't want to start you lot off but in an alternate universe Ford would be England's Mr Reliable star player and Farrell would be a good bench option who can cover 12

Puja

Cameo wrote:Don't want to start you lot off but in an alternate universe Ford would be England's Mr Reliable star player and Farrell would be a good bench option who can cover 12

Were always happy with that tangent

Not sure USA want England to drop it any more. Going to be a long night in the scrum

Ford + front ball @ the defensive line = rugby porn

Ha! Uugs (is there a worse shortening of a first name?) agrees with me.

Is everyone else's television feed rubbish and crackly or is it a problem on my end?

Puja

That’s a high tackle.

Puja wrote:Is everyone else's television feed rubbish and crackly or is it a problem on my end?

Puja

You’ve got a problem with your end.

Ouch

Mellsblue wrote:

Puja wrote:Is everyone else's television feed rubbish and crackly or is it a problem on my end?

Puja

You’ve got a problem with your end.

No need to get personal

1-in-5 over 40s

Insouciant wrote:

Mellsblue wrote:

Puja wrote:Is everyone else's television feed rubbish and crackly or is it a problem on my end?

Puja

You’ve got a problem with your end.

No need to get personal

He's not wrong - I fiddled with my end a bit and it's much better now.

Puja

Bloody hell. A rugby pundit praising Ford.

USA lineouts are nowhere near straight

Scrumhead wrote:USA lineouts are nowhere near straight

When's the last time you saw a lineout thrown straight down the middle?

ESPN Commentary:
The stats don't lie: England have had 68 percent possession so far, with the ball spending 82 percent of the time in Japan territory. There doesn't look to be a shock on the cards thus far.
Well, Japan being involved is a bit of a shock, I suppose.

Buggaluggs wrote:ESPN Commentary:
The stats don't lie: England have had 68 percent possession so far, with the ball spending 82 percent of the time in Japan territory. There doesn't look to be a shock on the cards thus far.
Well, Japan being involved is a bit of a shock, I suppose.

The game has been 100% in Japanese territory.

LCD's strikerate is mad.

Buggaluggs wrote:ESPN Commentary:
The stats don't lie: England have had 68 percent possession so far, with the ball spending 82 percent of the time in Japan territory. There doesn't look to be a shock on the cards thus far.
Well, Japan being involved is a bit of a shock, I suppose.

Techincally, we're spending 100% of time in Japanese territory and so are the Americans.

I don't remember who it was, but it was someone on the Italy minute-by-minute thread who said that England should deal with people swinging round the back of the maul by detaching and letting them fall away - looks like they listened to you. That's three mauls in a row where people have released when they've had an American swinging round on the back of their shirt.

Puja

twitchy wrote:

Buggaluggs wrote:ESPN Commentary:
The stats don't lie: England have had 68 percent possession so far, with the ball spending 82 percent of the time in Japan territory. There doesn't look to be a shock on the cards thus far.
Well, Japan being involved is a bit of a shock, I suppose.

The game has been 100% in Japanese territory.

Lol true [emoji23]

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

Ridiculous attempt to challenge for the ball!

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk