Re: England v Scotland
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:40 pm
Has Farrell overtaken Ford in the spiral-kicking contest? Funny how important some press pundits were saying that would be and now Jones has not even picked Ford.
You're probably right. I'd be happy with either, but Wilson has done a solid job there for us on a few occasions beforePuja wrote:You say that, but I think if the situation came up, Eddie would pick Curry. I don't necessarily know I'd disagree with him either - while his first few games showed striking inexperience in the role, his performances last year as one of England's big carriers has started to convince me that Eddie might've had a point.Danno wrote:Wilson. Next.
Puja
Yeah I thought "spiral bomb" was going to be this years most irritating buzz word. Has it already gone out of fashion?Oakboy wrote:Has Farrell overtaken Ford in the spiral-kicking contest? Funny how important some press pundits were saying that would be and now Jones has not even picked Ford.
Let's hope so. Maybe the practice time allotted to it could be diverted to running/passing or something equally old-fashioned?Mikey Brown wrote:Yeah I thought "spiral bomb" was going to be this years most irritating buzz word. Has it already gone out of fashion?Oakboy wrote:Has Farrell overtaken Ford in the spiral-kicking contest? Funny how important some press pundits were saying that would be and now Jones has not even picked Ford.
Why? We've got Farrell at 10, a newbie at 12, a guy who's not good enough at fullback. Relative newcomers at loosehead and tighthead too.francoisfou wrote:We surely won’t have a bum clencher like two years ago! If England doesn’t win by at least 20, I’m a Dutchman! (even with whatsisname at 10!)
I’m not buying that.Raggs wrote:Why? We've got Farrell at 10, a newbie at 12, a guy who's not good enough at fullback. Relative newcomers at loosehead and tighthead too.francoisfou wrote:We surely won’t have a bum clencher like two years ago! If England doesn’t win by at least 20, I’m a Dutchman! (even with whatsisname at 10!)
I'm vaguely confident of a win, but a 20+ point win sounds unlikely against Scotland at the best of times.
No "the hot-blood against the ice-man"?Mikey Brown wrote:I can’t believe someone at the BBC gets paid for writing this stuff.
“On Saturday, much will centre on Russell and Farrell.
The entertainer against the terminator. The mischief-maker against the commander-in-chief. The game-breaker against the results-grinder.”
Thought Eddie Butler’s comment about their being no role models in rugby and had the game not existed some of these players would be in prison as their alternative occupation was interesting on many levelsMikey Brown wrote:I can’t believe someone at the BBC gets paid for writing this stuff.
“On Saturday, much will centre on Russell and Farrell.
The entertainer against the terminator. The mischief-maker against the commander-in-chief. The game-breaker against the results-grinder.”
I've liked Varney, too. I hope England are noting how Italy have broken the French defensive line.16th man wrote:What wouldn't you give for a scrum half at even 75% of Dupont's level? Then they put Serin on as a sub. It's really not fair.
After their 3rd team almost did for England I was always concerned. Thrashing an Italian team who lack a defence doesn't change that much. One would hope the French play will look less effortless now the others have analysed them.Danno wrote:Anyone else becoming exponentially more nervous about France? Italy are as shunt as I've seen them, but still...
Powerful pack, top class half backs, direct runners outside them. They look very dangerous.Danno wrote:Anyone else becoming exponentially more nervous about France? Italy are as shunt as I've seen them, but still...
Stopped clock and all.jngf wrote:People won’t like this but SCW is right about England need to play quicker, question is (May aside) can they?
I'll be honest, if Penaud continues to be on the bench, I'm a lot happier.16th man wrote:Powerful pack, top class half backs, direct runners outside them. They look very dangerous.Danno wrote:Anyone else becoming exponentially more nervous about France? Italy are as shunt as I've seen them, but still...
I can't see us doing anything other than booting it long, hoping to suffocate them and take advantage of any discipline slips.
The players are capable of it. It's more a question of if they're told they can do it, or are just instructed to grind.jngf wrote:People won’t like this but SCW is right about England need to play quicker, question is (May aside) can they?
Also why is May the only one who can play quickly? Is there a new idea only fast players can play quickly?16th man wrote:The players are capable of it. It's more a question of if they're told they can do it, or are just instructed to grind.jngf wrote:People won’t like this but SCW is right about England need to play quicker, question is (May aside) can they?
Digby wrote:Also why is May the only one who can play quickly? Is there a new idea only fast players can play quickly?16th man wrote:The players are capable of it. It's more a question of if they're told they can do it, or are just instructed to grind.jngf wrote:People won’t like this but SCW is right about England need to play quicker, question is (May aside) can they?