Training Squad named ...
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
I still don't get the reasoning in McGuigan. He's a solid option sure, but he's 28, and never been in international consideration until we've got 4+ hookers already in/out of our thoughts for various reasons. Langdon and Capon have both been very impressive, both much younger and likely to improve to a greater degree in the next 2 years in the event that we do need to find another hooker after Dunn, George, LCD and Singleton for the RWC.
I'm just as confused as to why Bassett is in the squad btw. Don't see the point of it.
I'm just as confused as to why Bassett is in the squad btw. Don't see the point of it.
-
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
Likes to carry, likes to contest the breakdown and has solid basics. Sounds like an Eddie style option though he might not be quite big enough as Eddie does like bigger hookers.Puja wrote:Forgot all about Langdon! He's a decent option and one I'd be happy with.FKAS wrote:Langdon from Sale could come in. Very good young hooker and I'd certainly have him up there with Capon and over Oghre and Blamire based on this season's form.
Puja
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
I noted that in response to an idea around other than the A game it was going to be a full squad. Though one would likely think there'll be more withdrawals to come even once the top 4 and Sarries will in theory have players released.Banquo wrote:..nor players from our top 4 teams plus any spare sarries..Digby wrote:full squad bar those off with the Lions, and those being rested, which basically says it's not a full squad
Interesting too there's little to no talk of any of the tours being called off
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
Would he not be bigger than Oghre?FKAS wrote:Likes to carry, likes to contest the breakdown and has solid basics. Sounds like an Eddie style option though he might not be quite big enough as Eddie does like bigger hookers.Puja wrote:Forgot all about Langdon! He's a decent option and one I'd be happy with.FKAS wrote:Langdon from Sale could come in. Very good young hooker and I'd certainly have him up there with Capon and over Oghre and Blamire based on this season's form.
Puja
-
- Posts: 5916
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
I'd justify selecting McGuigan based on him being an inform player in a position we are seriously weakened without our 3 best options.Raggs wrote:I still don't get the reasoning in McGuigan. He's a solid option sure, but he's 28, and never been in international consideration until we've got 4+ hookers already in/out of our thoughts for various reasons. Langdon and Capon have both been very impressive, both much younger and likely to improve to a greater degree in the next 2 years in the event that we do need to find another hooker after Dunn, George, LCD and Singleton for the RWC.
I'm just as confused as to why Bassett is in the squad btw. Don't see the point of it.
I dont think 28 is too old for a hooker and i see no harm in having him in the squad alongside a couple of younger players.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
As so often I don't think form that important, and whilst I wouldn't have thought it odd were it the other way around this way if anything (and it is in the context of none of this really matters) seems a better betfivepointer wrote:I'd justify selecting McGuigan based on him being an inform player in a position we are seriously weakened without our 3 best options.Raggs wrote:I still don't get the reasoning in McGuigan. He's a solid option sure, but he's 28, and never been in international consideration until we've got 4+ hookers already in/out of our thoughts for various reasons. Langdon and Capon have both been very impressive, both much younger and likely to improve to a greater degree in the next 2 years in the event that we do need to find another hooker after Dunn, George, LCD and Singleton for the RWC.
I'm just as confused as to why Bassett is in the squad btw. Don't see the point of it.
I dont think 28 is too old for a hooker and i see no harm in having him in the squad alongside a couple of younger players.
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
On the other side of the coin, this is the perfect opportunity to look at players in form to see if they’re just in form or if they’ve actually simply found another gear.Digby wrote:As so often I don't think form that important, and whilst I wouldn't have thought it odd were it the other way around this way if anything (and it is in the context of none of this really matters) seems a better betfivepointer wrote:I'd justify selecting McGuigan based on him being an inform player in a position we are seriously weakened without our 3 best options.Raggs wrote:I still don't get the reasoning in McGuigan. He's a solid option sure, but he's 28, and never been in international consideration until we've got 4+ hookers already in/out of our thoughts for various reasons. Langdon and Capon have both been very impressive, both much younger and likely to improve to a greater degree in the next 2 years in the event that we do need to find another hooker after Dunn, George, LCD and Singleton for the RWC.
I'm just as confused as to why Bassett is in the squad btw. Don't see the point of it.
I dont think 28 is too old for a hooker and i see no harm in having him in the squad alongside a couple of younger players.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
How, by having them play Millfield 3rds?Stom wrote:On the other side of the coin, this is the perfect opportunity to look at players in form to see if they’re just in form or if they’ve actually simply found another gear.Digby wrote:As so often I don't think form that important, and whilst I wouldn't have thought it odd were it the other way around this way if anything (and it is in the context of none of this really matters) seems a better betfivepointer wrote:
I'd justify selecting McGuigan based on him being an inform player in a position we are seriously weakened without our 3 best options.
I dont think 28 is too old for a hooker and i see no harm in having him in the squad alongside a couple of younger players.
This sort of tour is what generates claims a Jordan Crane can play for England
-
- Posts: 5997
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
At the moment it’s just a training squad.Raggs wrote:I still don't get the reasoning in McGuigan. He's a solid option sure, but he's 28, and never been in international consideration until we've got 4+ hookers already in/out of our thoughts for various reasons. Langdon and Capon have both been very impressive, both much younger and likely to improve to a greater degree in the next 2 years in the event that we do need to find another hooker after Dunn, George, LCD and Singleton for the RWC.
I'm just as confused as to why Bassett is in the squad btw. Don't see the point of it.
The difference with Bassett is that I’d expect him to drop out when other back three players from the play off sides are available.
Whereas with only 2 hookers, it looks like Blamire and Oghre are playing in the tests.
-
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
Well to be fair before he had his first knee issues and lost what little pace he had...Digby wrote:How, by having them play Millfield 3rds?Stom wrote:On the other side of the coin, this is the perfect opportunity to look at players in form to see if they’re just in form or if they’ve actually simply found another gear.Digby wrote:
As so often I don't think form that important, and whilst I wouldn't have thought it odd were it the other way around this way if anything (and it is in the context of none of this really matters) seems a better bet
This sort of tour is what generates claims a Jordan Crane can play for England
- Puja
- Posts: 17745
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
Sean Robinson out injured - Josh McNally in: https://www.rugbypass.com/news/injury-r ... -robinson/
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 19213
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
BTW did anyone remark on Mark Wilson's absence?
- Puja
- Posts: 17745
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
Poor sod. So forgotten that he doesn't even merit a mention till page 4.Banquo wrote:BTW did anyone remark on Mark Wilson's absence?
He doesn't exactly need the rest off the back of this season, so I'd assume he's not in Eddie's future plans. Can't say I hugely disagree - good player, but with the cavalcade of young back row talent coming through, you'd think his time has passed barring an extraordinary resurgence.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 5997
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
Agreed (with some reluctance). I still really rate Wilson but given who we have knocking on the door, I’m not overly surprised if he’s making way.
If I had to pick a World Cup squad tomorrow I’d pick him though.
If I had to pick a World Cup squad tomorrow I’d pick him though.
-
- Posts: 19213
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
....I'd also think he'd be a handy voice in the camp to help the young lads learn a bit of back row tradecraft. That's his big USP- someone like ludlam could learn from him....puppy dog enthusiasm only takes you so far.
-
- Posts: 5916
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
Pity about Robinson.
Understand why Wilson isnt involved. He may not have many opportunities in the future with England due to his age and the quality of player coming through.
Understand why Wilson isnt involved. He may not have many opportunities in the future with England due to his age and the quality of player coming through.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
Maybe it's felt that Underhill is a senior enough figure in the backrow?
-
- Posts: 19213
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
I thought that on reflection, but my point isn’t about seniority, it’s about tradecraft. To my mind Wilson is a very smart player, Underhill more about physicality- he could benefit too. Anyway, utterly moot.Raggs wrote:Maybe it's felt that Underhill is a senior enough figure in the backrow?
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2461
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
Wilson has to stop eventually. A shame though, I like these robshaw style players.
-
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
I had it in my mind that Oghre is shorter and stockier. Wasn't sure so a quick Google and the Wasps website has him at 5'10 and 16st1. Sale website has Langdon at 6ft and 16st3 so not really much in it though who knows with Eddie. I'd have Langdon in there to have a look at him.Digby wrote:Would he not be bigger than Oghre?FKAS wrote:Likes to carry, likes to contest the breakdown and has solid basics. Sounds like an Eddie style option though he might not be quite big enough as Eddie does like bigger hookers.Puja wrote:
Forgot all about Langdon! He's a decent option and one I'd be happy with.
Puja
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
God bless the ongoing nonsense spat out as supposed player height and weight stats
-
- Posts: 19213
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
Never thought of him as being like Robshaw tbh,but take your point. Agreed he's approaching his sell by date, plus injury is always just around the corner.Mr Mwenda wrote:Wilson has to stop eventually. A shame though, I like these robshaw style players.
-
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
You asked the question...Digby wrote:God bless the ongoing nonsense spat out as supposed player height and weight stats
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Training Squad named ...
I thought I was politely trying to say that sounds like bollocks. If not as much bollocks as the clearly fantasy based approached to rugby sites when it comes to heights and weights, do they even realise many people have met these people and stood next to them, and there's just no way they're even close to true in many instancesFKAS wrote:You asked the question...Digby wrote:God bless the ongoing nonsense spat out as supposed player height and weight stats
- jngf
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: Training Squad named ...
Why does that apply to Ludlum and not Tom Curry ? (Not sure how objective that is)Banquo wrote:....I'd also think he'd be a handy voice in the camp to help the young lads learn a bit of back row tradecraft. That's his big USP- someone like ludlam could learn from him....puppy dog enthusiasm only takes you so far.