Whatever the legal niceties, it does look as though Danny had a fair bit to sup. Strange that his minders/mates would let him drive himeslf if he were glazed and slurring. Maybe he has none. Or maybe they had had a skinful too.
Re: Cipriani clearly not guilty
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:33 pm
by Mikey Brown
Why do people say sup? It just sounds weird. It makes me cringe whenever I read the beer thread on here.
Sorry to aim that at you, Spiff. You're not the main culprit.
Oh, Cipriani? Yeah, a good player (not that good anyway) but drink driving is a shitty, shitty thing to do.
Re: Cipriani clearly not guilty
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 11:28 pm
by Spiffy
Mikey Brown wrote:Why do people say sup? It just sounds weird. It makes me cringe whenever I read the beer thread on here.
Sorry to aim that at you, Spiff. You're not the main culprit.
Oh, Cipriani? Yeah, a good player (not that good anyway) but drink driving is a shitty, shitty thing to do.
Spiffy wrote:Whatever the legal niceties, it does look as though Danny had a fair bit to sup. Strange that his minders/mates would let him drive himeslf if he were glazed and slurring. Maybe he has none. Or maybe they had had a skinful too.
The words sound like police boilerplate ("his speech was slurred, his eyes were glazed, he was drunk...."). But he seems way over the limit; not just a couple..,
