Sale Vs Tigers

Moderator: Puja

Danno
Posts: 2665
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Danno »

Ha brilliant
Banquo
Posts: 19271
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

and another pen
Banquo
Posts: 19271
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Great mauling, but so many pens
User avatar
Mr Mwenda
Posts: 2461
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Mr Mwenda »

Banquo wrote:JVP on.....for Burns! Slots in at.......15.

Think Burns must be hurt, notwithstanding Healeys mumbling
Eddie, is that you?
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by 16th man »

Got to be a yellow there.

5 yards out and players available, killing that is a definite binning.
Banquo
Posts: 19271
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Mr Mwenda wrote:
Banquo wrote:JVP on.....for Burns! Slots in at.......15.

Think Burns must be hurt, notwithstanding Healeys mumbling
Eddie, is that you?
que
twitchy
Posts: 3294
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by twitchy »

Really fun game as a neutral.
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by p/d »

Ha ha
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by 16th man »

twitchy wrote:Really fun game as a neutral.
1st half was dire but the 2nd half has been a pretty good advert.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17784
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Puja »

Harsh penalty there. Not entirely sure what else Robinson could possibly have done to get out of the way there.

JVP's turned out to be quite a good full-back in the end. He's claimed three difficult high balls and came into the line pretty well.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19271
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

wiggy must be delighted to play 80!

well done sale!! Tigers will be kicking themselves.
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by p/d »

I do hope the Burns sub wasn’t tactical
Banquo
Posts: 19271
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote:Harsh penalty there. Not entirely sure what else Robinson could possibly have done to get out of the way there.

JVP's turned out to be quite a good full-back in the end. He's claimed three difficult high balls and came into the line pretty well.

Puja
Hes done well. But still odd subbing
Banquo
Posts: 19271
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

p/d wrote:I do hope the Burns sub wasn’t tactical
indeed. He was limping, but Healey seems adamant
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by 16th man »

Not quite sure how Tigers blew a bonus point from that game.
Banquo
Posts: 19271
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

great watch, if a tad eccentric
Banquo
Posts: 19271
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

16th man wrote:Not quite sure how Tigers blew a bonus point from that game.
Sale upped their intensity, and Tigers changes I`d think.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6414
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Oakboy »

Sanderson 7, Borthwick 4.
FKAS
Posts: 8515
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by FKAS »

Tigers were bloody awful in the second half. I know I've said that already but they were so bad it needed repeating. Burns must have been injured there's no way we'd have had Wigglesworth walking through the last 20 minutes otherwise. Burns must have picked up the injury shortly before half time as he didn't turn up in the second half before going off injured either.

Matt Scott seemingly couldn't organise the defence from 13 with Sale casually strolling down his channel at will. So many errors it was painful as we chased the game far too much in the last 10 mins.

Credit to Sale they upped the tempo after looking well off the boil in the first half. McGinty was good and the du Preez twins were colossal up front.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Spiffy »

MacGinty is a clever FH with vision and a great all-round game. A pity for Ireland that he slipped through the net at an early stage and wound up playing for the USA. With Jackson out of the reckoning, he'd be a good successor to Sexton.
francoisfou
Posts: 2534
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
Location: Haute-Garonne

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by francoisfou »

The good news is that gap between first and second has only narrowed by 1 point, but Tigers definitely need a bp win next Saturday against Wuss to get back on song.
fivepointer
Posts: 5922
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by fivepointer »

The game turned on the subbing of Burns. Also Sale picked up when Warr came on. Reed, another sub, finished his try with aplomb. That lad is quick.
Enjoyed Roebuck's try.
The duPreez bros were central for Sale who were poor for the first 40 odd minutes of the game.
Stirring game for the neutral.
FKAS
Posts: 8515
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by FKAS »

Agree on Warr, I was a little surprised he didn't start. Certainly made a real impact off the bench.

Plenty of good tries in that game for the neutral.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14576
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by Mellsblue »

I reckon Tigers would’ve won if JVP had started.
FKAS
Posts: 8515
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Sale Vs Tigers

Post by FKAS »

Mellsblue wrote:I reckon Tigers would’ve won if JVP had started.
If JVP had been able to replace Wigglesworth on 50/55 as planned I think we might have managed to sneak it.
Post Reply