Page 4 of 15
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2024 7:57 pm
by Mellsblue
TheDasher wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 7:42 pm
Mellsblue wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 6:36 pm
Baxter
LCD
Cole
Coles
Martin
Hill
B Cuzza
CCS
JVP
F Smith
Sleightholme
Dingwall
Lawrence
Freeman
Carpenter
Dan
Genge
Heyes
Tizard
Pollock
Porter
M Smith
Roebuck
I've lost the plot on the rules - can he call up anyone from the England A squad?
Not a clue but who cares anymore!
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:51 pm
by Banquo
FKAS wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 5:09 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 4:59 pm
FKAS wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 4:56 pm
I dunno, Murley went on record as saying that Borthwick told him he was doing the right things but was only getting so many touches a game and Borthwick wanted him to get more touches and carry more. I'd imagine it was similar for Ribbans. Unless Ribbans goes on record hard to know. Murley did go and record and seemed to like the feedback.
Think its true what SB said to Ribbans, I'm saying it was a very odd bit of feedback.
You make x number of dominant tackles and y number of metres post contact on average which is good but I need you to up those numbers. Not really surprising thing to say to a physical player you want to kick on. Saints having a porous defence at that stage as well probably didn't help.
We are guessing, but the anecdotal report I got was not presented like that at all. It wasn't quantitative.
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2024 10:11 pm
by Epaminondas Pules
The irony of Staggeringly Bad telling a lock they weren’t physical enough!
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2024 10:37 pm
by Banquo
Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 10:11 pm
The irony of Staggeringly Bad telling a lock they weren’t physical enough!
Well quite
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 7:23 am
by FKAS
Banquo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:51 pm
FKAS wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 5:09 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 4:59 pm
Think its true what SB said to Ribbans, I'm saying it was a very odd bit of feedback.
You make x number of dominant tackles and y number of metres post contact on average which is good but I need you to up those numbers. Not really surprising thing to say to a physical player you want to kick on. Saints having a porous defence at that stage as well probably didn't help.
We are guessing, but the anecdotal report I got was not presented like that at all. It wasn't quantitative.
Doesn't sound like Stats Backer but anecdotes do tend to be painted to suit the teller.
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 7:32 am
by Banquo
FKAS wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 7:23 am
Banquo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:51 pm
FKAS wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 5:09 pm
You make x number of dominant tackles and y number of metres post contact on average which is good but I need you to up those numbers. Not really surprising thing to say to a physical player you want to kick on. Saints having a porous defence at that stage as well probably didn't help.
We are guessing, but the anecdotal report I got was not presented like that at all. It wasn't quantitative.
Doesn't sound like Stats Backer but anecdotes do tend to be painted to suit the teller.
I will leave it there. Next time you meet Ribbans you can ask him
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 10:21 am
by Mikey Brown
Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 10:11 pm
The irony of Staggeringly Bad telling a lock they weren’t physical enough!
So now we want him to embody all of his own shortcomings as a player because… irony?
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 10:46 am
by Danno
Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 10:21 am
Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 10:11 pm
The irony of Staggeringly Bad telling a lock they weren’t physical enough!
So now we want him to embody all of his own shortcomings as a player because… irony?
He was a bit shit tbf
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:05 am
by Mellsblue
If he brings back the post match bleeding nose it’ll buy him a couple of more matches, imo.
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:25 am
by Banquo
Mellsblue wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:05 am
If he brings back the post match bleeding nose it’ll buy him a couple of more matches, imo.
groundhog day
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:25 am
by jngf
Borthwick would make a first class cabinet minister
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:28 am
by Banquo
jngf wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:25 am
Borthwick would make a first class cabinet
fixed that
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:39 am
by Mellsblue
Banquo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:28 am
jngf wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:25 am
Borthwick would make a first class cabinet
fixed that
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 2:30 pm
by twitchy
Murley called up.
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 2:48 pm
by fivepointer
Yep, just Murley from the A team squad. IFW not included.
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 3:31 pm
by Banquo
twitchy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 2:30 pm
Murley called up.
No winger no cry
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 4:15 pm
by p/d
fivepointer wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 2:48 pm
Yep, just Murley from the A team squad. IFW not included.
Marley in for Daly. I forgot Daly was even there…..
Anyway…
“These are painful experiences we're going through as a team right now but ultimately, this adversity will be good in the long term and we will be a better team for these experiences.“
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 4:19 pm
by Stom
Murley should be in the XXIII.
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 4:20 pm
by Banquo
Stom wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 4:19 pm
Murley should be in the XXIII.
for Roebuck?
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 4:33 pm
by Danno
Nah Freeman
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 4:49 pm
by Stom
Banquo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 4:20 pm
Stom wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 4:19 pm
Murley should be in the XXIII.
for Roebuck?
Yep. I don’t get what roebuck offers, tbh. He just seems one of those “yeah, he’s decent” players who you would never pick if you had Murley available, or Ibitoye, or even Radwan
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 5:08 pm
by Banquo
Danno wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 4:33 pmNah Freeman
Cry Freeman
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 5:48 pm
by p/d
Really rate Roebuck, so hope to see him start.
Don’t know too much about Murley apart from he sports a comedy ‘tache
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 7:07 pm
by Mikey Brown
p/d wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 5:48 pm
Really rate Roebuck, so hope to see him start.
Don’t know too much about Murley apart from he sports a comedy ‘tache
Iike the look of Roebuck too. Gets over the line a bit and is great in the air. He’s a big lad but I don’t know how well/frequently he uses it? Seems to have a decent step.
Would compare him more to Freeman in style, whereas Murley is more like IFW. Scores a lot of tries and is generally just far more physical and abrasive than defenders seem to expect, with a great work rate and awareness of space/support.
That’s very much the role I thought Murley could take for England a couple of seasons back, then he got a bunch of injuries and IFW came from nowhere.
Re: Team for Japan
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 7:19 pm
by p/d
Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 7:07 pm
p/d wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 5:48 pm
Really rate Roebuck, so hope to see him start.
Don’t know too much about Murley apart from he sports a comedy ‘tache
Iike the look of Roebuck too. Gets over the line a bit and is great in the air. He’s a big lad but I don’t know how well/frequently he uses it? Seems to have a decent step.
Would compare him more to Freeman in style, whereas Murley is more like IFW. Scores a lot of tries and is generally just far more physical and abrasive than defenders seem to expect, with a great work rate and awareness of space/support.
That’s very much the role I thought Murley could take for England a couple of seasons back, then he got a bunch of injuries and IFW came from nowhere.
Ah!! Then more than happy to see Murley involved.
Though if he is playing outside the current dirge of creativity then being good in the air probably trumps all.