More on Syria
-
- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: More on Syria
What are the rooskies up to here? Flooding Europe with refugees, rise of the right, total takeover? Bleak
- Galfon
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: More on Syria
Still trying to distance Turkey from NATO, despite uncomfortable situation in Idlib with Assad trying to clear the area Erdogan hoped to use for returning refugees.
At least Turkey's impressive drone-army set their sights on Syrian forces only thus far...but doesn't seem to have changed much apart from sentiments back home.
At least Turkey's impressive drone-army set their sights on Syrian forces only thus far...but doesn't seem to have changed much apart from sentiments back home.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: More on Syria
I think Erdogan is about to get a harsh lesson in geo-politics in the not too distant future.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: More on Syria
He's off to Brussels tomorrow for talks on the migrant impasse, apparently.Greece has closed their border and there are reports of vigilante groups around the islands, searching out anyone there illegally and keeping NGO activity to a minimum.( the locals appear to have had enough - 'send them elsewhere!' is the cry from over the water.) It looks as if the 2016 deal with EU did not pan out as expected.
- Zhivago
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
- Location: Amsterdam
-
- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: More on Syria
The yanks arming fundamentalist jihadis has never gone wrong before......right!
Not that there's any merit in the al assad/putin regime
Not that there's any merit in the al assad/putin regime
Last edited by paddy no 11 on Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: More on Syria
Women are not allowed to talk in public spaces in Afghanistan anymore
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16083
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: More on Syria
At least we know Greg Wallace’s whereabouts.
- Zhivago
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
- Location: Amsterdam
Re: More on Syria
HTS is not funded by USA. Turkey and Qatar fund them.paddy no 11 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:57 am The yanks arming fundamentalist jihadis has never gone wrong before......right!
Not that there's any merit in the al assad/putin regime
Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!
-
- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: More on Syria
Thanks, not sure where I got that misinformation from. Why are turkey and the uae involved here? What's in it for them?Zhivago wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 6:29 pmHTS is not funded by USA. Turkey and Qatar fund them.paddy no 11 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:57 am The yanks arming fundamentalist jihadis has never gone wrong before......right!
Not that there's any merit in the al assad/putin regime
- Zhivago
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
- Location: Amsterdam
Re: More on Syria
As I said years ago, probably they want to build a gas pipeline through Syriapaddy no 11 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 7:51 pmZhivago wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 6:29 pmHTS is not funded by USA. Turkey and Qatar fund them.paddy no 11 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:57 am The yanks arming fundamentalist jihadis has never gone wrong before......right!
Not that there's any merit in the al assad/putin regime
Thanks, not sure where I got that misinformation from. Why are turkey and the uae involved here? What's in it for them?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatar%E ... y_pipeline
Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!
-
- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: More on Syria
As your informing meZhivago wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:48 amAs I said years ago, probably they want to build a gas pipeline through Syriapaddy no 11 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 7:51 pm
Thanks, not sure where I got that misinformation from. Why are turkey and the uae involved here? What's in it for them?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatar%E ... y_pipeline
UAE are in Sudan too and this is mineral driven too? No ideology just wealth driven?
I'll correct wealth to greed
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9358
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: More on Syria
SDF is the US supplied one, isn't it?Zhivago wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 6:29 pmHTS is not funded by USA. Turkey and Qatar fund them.paddy no 11 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:57 am The yanks arming fundamentalist jihadis has never gone wrong before......right!
Not that there's any merit in the al assad/putin regime
- Zhivago
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
- Location: Amsterdam
Re: More on Syria
UAE is not Qatarpaddy no 11 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2024 9:46 amAs your informing meZhivago wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:48 amAs I said years ago, probably they want to build a gas pipeline through Syriapaddy no 11 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 7:51 pm
Thanks, not sure where I got that misinformation from. Why are turkey and the uae involved here? What's in it for them?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatar%E ... y_pipeline
UAE are in Sudan too and this is mineral driven too? No ideology just wealth driven?
I'll correct wealth to greed
Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!
- Zhivago
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
- Location: Amsterdam
Re: More on Syria
I think soWhich Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:54 amSDF is the US supplied one, isn't it?Zhivago wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 6:29 pmHTS is not funded by USA. Turkey and Qatar fund them.paddy no 11 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:57 am The yanks arming fundamentalist jihadis has never gone wrong before......right!
Not that there's any merit in the al assad/putin regime
Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: More on Syria
Latest reports suggest that Assad has fled/is dead and Damascus has fallen. Not sure how reliable they are but the Syrian army seems very uninterested in fighting without massive Russian support.
God alone knows what happens to Syria now. The new owners of Damascus aren’t exactly liberal and I can’t see the other factions, especially the Kurds just disarming.
It does mean embarrassment for Russia who now will almost certainly lose its strategically important naval and SigInt bases unless Russia strikes a new deal (unlikely). It’s a good day for turkey though.
God alone knows what happens to Syria now. The new owners of Damascus aren’t exactly liberal and I can’t see the other factions, especially the Kurds just disarming.
It does mean embarrassment for Russia who now will almost certainly lose its strategically important naval and SigInt bases unless Russia strikes a new deal (unlikely). It’s a good day for turkey though.
- Zhivago
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
- Location: Amsterdam
Re: More on Syria
It won't happen, but there should be a Kurdish stateSandydragon wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 8:42 am Latest reports suggest that Assad has fled/is dead and Damascus has fallen. Not sure how reliable they are but the Syrian army seems very uninterested in fighting without massive Russian support.
God alone knows what happens to Syria now. The new owners of Damascus aren’t exactly liberal and I can’t see the other factions, especially the Kurds just disarming.
It does mean embarrassment for Russia who now will almost certainly lose its strategically important naval and SigInt bases unless Russia strikes a new deal (unlikely). It’s a good day for turkey though.
Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: More on Syria
Agreed, but Turkey really won’t want that.Zhivago wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 9:52 amIt won't happen, but there should be a Kurdish stateSandydragon wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 8:42 am Latest reports suggest that Assad has fled/is dead and Damascus has fallen. Not sure how reliable they are but the Syrian army seems very uninterested in fighting without massive Russian support.
God alone knows what happens to Syria now. The new owners of Damascus aren’t exactly liberal and I can’t see the other factions, especially the Kurds just disarming.
It does mean embarrassment for Russia who now will almost certainly lose its strategically important naval and SigInt bases unless Russia strikes a new deal (unlikely). It’s a good day for turkey though.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: More on Syria
True but it would be nice if the Kurds can hold that big chunk of the North of Syria they have. It's a start. In a fair world they'd have a bit of Syria, a bit of Iraq and a bit of Turkey. Basically where the Kurds live.Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:02 amAgreed, but Turkey really won’t want that.Zhivago wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 9:52 amIt won't happen, but there should be a Kurdish stateSandydragon wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 8:42 am Latest reports suggest that Assad has fled/is dead and Damascus has fallen. Not sure how reliable they are but the Syrian army seems very uninterested in fighting without massive Russian support.
God alone knows what happens to Syria now. The new owners of Damascus aren’t exactly liberal and I can’t see the other factions, especially the Kurds just disarming.
It does mean embarrassment for Russia who now will almost certainly lose its strategically important naval and SigInt bases unless Russia strikes a new deal (unlikely). It’s a good day for turkey though.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: More on Syria
I agree. But having a viable Kurdish state on its border will provoke Turkey. I expect they will have some demands for their support which will include ensuring that doesn’t happen.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 1:50 pmTrue but it would be nice if the Kurds can hold that big chunk of the North of Syria they have. It's a start. In a fair world they'd have a bit of Syria, a bit of Iraq and a bit of Turkey. Basically where the Kurds live.
- Puja
- Posts: 18180
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: More on Syria
I don't really understand the Turkish position here. I can absolutely understand why they don't want Kurdistan within their borders or carved out of their land, but surely this is the ideal opportunity to set one up out of part of Syria and say to all the Kurdish nationalists, "Here you go, you want a homeland, it's over there, kindly fuck off in that direction" without it really costing them anything?Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 2:35 pmI agree. But having a viable Kurdish state on its border will provoke Turkey. I expect they will have some demands for their support which will include ensuring that doesn’t happen.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 1:50 pmTrue but it would be nice if the Kurds can hold that big chunk of the North of Syria they have. It's a start. In a fair world they'd have a bit of Syria, a bit of Iraq and a bit of Turkey. Basically where the Kurds live.
Can someone explain why they're they so against that?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: More on Syria
There's a wiki page that answers thisPuja wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 3:36 pmI don't really understand the Turkish position here. I can absolutely understand why they don't want Kurdistan within their borders or carved out of their land, but surely this is the ideal opportunity to set one up out of part of Syria and say to all the Kurdish nationalists, "Here you go, you want a homeland, it's over there, kindly fuck off in that direction" without it really costing them anything?Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 2:35 pmI agree. But having a viable Kurdish state on its border will provoke Turkey. I expect they will have some demands for their support which will include ensuring that doesn’t happen.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 1:50 pm True but it would be nice if the Kurds can hold that big chunk of the North of Syria they have. It's a start. In a fair world they'd have a bit of Syria, a bit of Iraq and a bit of Turkey. Basically where the Kurds live.
Can someone explain why they're they so against that?
Puja
Turkey does not recognise kurdish in any aspect there all turkmen. Erdoğan will double down on this - international community would have zero chance to influence I'd say
- Puja
- Posts: 18180
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: More on Syria
Ah. So the issue isn't that Turkey are determined that they own the land, it's that they're determined that they own the people? The latter belief seems substantially more difficult to enforce than the former, but I guess logic never did come into these things.paddy no 11 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 4:16 pmThere's a wiki page that answers thisPuja wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 3:36 pmI don't really understand the Turkish position here. I can absolutely understand why they don't want Kurdistan within their borders or carved out of their land, but surely this is the ideal opportunity to set one up out of part of Syria and say to all the Kurdish nationalists, "Here you go, you want a homeland, it's over there, kindly fuck off in that direction" without it really costing them anything?Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2024 2:35 pm
I agree. But having a viable Kurdish state on its border will provoke Turkey. I expect they will have some demands for their support which will include ensuring that doesn’t happen.
Can someone explain why they're they so against that?
Puja
Turkey does not recognise kurdish in any aspect there all turkmen. Erdoğan will double down on this - international community would have zero chance to influence I'd say
Thanks for the explanation.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: More on Syria
Plus would a a Kurdish homeland over the border not want the land in Turkey currently occupied by Kurds? Forcibly moving out a entire group of people is pretty much ethnic cleansing, so unlikely to win too many friends.