Lions

Moderator: OptimisticJock

Post Reply
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12408
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Mikey Brown »

af73 wrote:For all the crap Hogg in particular had directed at him from the first game, it will be interesting to see (in the interests of balance) how those competing for his position are written up. Particularly given that the identical mistake of carrying the ball into touch was repeated. Hogg's oft cited defensive weakness was anything but compared to 1/2p who didn't so much miss a tackle as not get within 5 yards of it for the winning try.
I actually felt the first inkling of unity and togetherness on here today as posters from all four nations conceded that basically all our players are playing like shit. Definitely the whole coaching team too, not just poor Hoggy.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: RE: Re: Lions

Post by morepork »

Big D wrote:
af73 wrote:For all the crap Hogg in particular had directed at him from the first game, it will be interesting to see (in the interests of balance) how those competing for his position are written up. Particularly given that the identical mistake of carrying the ball into touch was repeated. Hogg's oft cited defensive weakness was anything but compared to 1/2p who didn't so much miss a tackle as not get within 5 yards of it for the winning try.
Just watching the game now. 8 min in and Nowell caught narrow twice and for the 1st try, in the lead up there was a cross kick where 1/2p got bumped but made the tackle when in reality he should have had the guy in touch.

The fuck up of a 4 on 2 or 3 was poor too. Henshaw and the 1/2p did nothing to challenge the defence..just shovelled it on.

Yeah but nah. Half-P got skinned by West, plain and simple. Would Hogg have nailed West? Maybe, but Hogg displayed some Benny Hill skills on the big stage in the previous game when in much more Zen circumstances. I like Hogg, and think Gatland will use him purely to rest more conservative players, but Hogg shat that one. I think Hogg is the better choice at the back for a team that doesn't predicate the game plan around kicking possession away. Make of that what you will.
Big D
Posts: 5576
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

Well watching that was a waste of time.

I guess the team on Saturday will be:
Vunipola, George, furlong, kruis, AWJ, POM, Warburton, Faletau
Murray, Farrell, williams, teo, JD2 (or will we see him at 12 with JJ - prob not), North, Hogg (or Williams with another wing)
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2210
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: RE: Re: Lions

Post by Spiffy »

morepork wrote:
Big D wrote:
af73 wrote:For all the crap Hogg in particular had directed at him from the first game, it will be interesting to see (in the interests of balance) how those competing for his position are written up. Particularly given that the identical mistake of carrying the ball into touch was repeated. Hogg's oft cited defensive weakness was anything but compared to 1/2p who didn't so much miss a tackle as not get within 5 yards of it for the winning try.
Just watching the game now. 8 min in and Nowell caught narrow twice and for the 1st try, in the lead up there was a cross kick where 1/2p got bumped but made the tackle when in reality he should have had the guy in touch.

The fuck up of a 4 on 2 or 3 was poor too. Henshaw and the 1/2p did nothing to challenge the defence..just shovelled it on.

Yeah but nah. Half-P got skinned by West, plain and simple. Would Hogg have nailed West? Maybe, but Hogg displayed some Benny Hill skills on the big stage in the previous game when in much more Zen circumstances. I like Hogg, and think Gatland will use him purely to rest more conservative players, but Hogg shat that one. I think Hogg is the better choice at the back for a team that doesn't predicate the game plan around kicking possession away. Make of that what you will.
At least Hogg has a bit of flair and real gas. Unlike the alternatives. His tackling can be sloppy but he's been no worse than may others in this respect. He is a potential game breaker. Gatland should just take the risk and play him, especially since nobody else looks remotely like an effective counterattacker or try scorer. Might as well go down giving it a bit of a thrash. There's really nothing to lose.
Big D
Posts: 5576
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

I almost got the side right. Forgot about SOB.
whatisthejava
Posts: 1792
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm

Re: RE: Re: Lions

Post by whatisthejava »

Spiffy wrote:
morepork wrote:
Big D wrote: Just watching the game now. 8 min in and Nowell caught narrow twice and for the 1st try, in the lead up there was a cross kick where 1/2p got bumped but made the tackle when in reality he should have had the guy in touch.

The fuck up of a 4 on 2 or 3 was poor too. Henshaw and the 1/2p did nothing to challenge the defence..just shovelled it on.

Yeah but nah. Half-P got skinned by West, plain and simple. Would Hogg have nailed West? Maybe, but Hogg displayed some Benny Hill skills on the big stage in the previous game when in much more Zen circumstances. I like Hogg, and think Gatland will use him purely to rest more conservative players, but Hogg shat that one. I think Hogg is the better choice at the back for a team that doesn't predicate the game plan around kicking possession away. Make of that what you will.
At least Hogg has a bit of flair and real gas. Unlike the alternatives. His tackling can be sloppy but he's been no worse than may others in this respect. He is a potential game breaker. Gatland should just take the risk and play him, especially since nobody else looks remotely like an effective counterattacker or try scorer. Might as well go down giving it a bit of a thrash. There's really nothing to lose.
I agree with you but Gatland wont pick Hogg, he as predicted will play conservative and pick half penny, even the commentators know that we areg going to try and win by defensive first, Hogg will be on the bench unless 1/2p gets injured and even then I think he will got for LW
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2670
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

I think Hogg's only hope was to have outstanding performances which demanded selection by the rugby public and pundits. Without that Gatland will just go with safety first.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
skidger
Posts: 495
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am

Re: RE: Re: Lions

Post by skidger »

Spiffy wrote:
morepork wrote:
Big D wrote: Just watching the game now. 8 min in and Nowell caught narrow twice and for the 1st try, in the lead up there was a cross kick where 1/2p got bumped but made the tackle when in reality he should have had the guy in touch.

The fuck up of a 4 on 2 or 3 was poor too. Henshaw and the 1/2p did nothing to challenge the defence..just shovelled it on.

Yeah but nah. Half-P got skinned by West, plain and simple. Would Hogg have nailed West? Maybe, but Hogg displayed some Benny Hill skills on the big stage in the previous game when in much more Zen circumstances. I like Hogg, and think Gatland will use him purely to rest more conservative players, but Hogg shat that one. I think Hogg is the better choice at the back for a team that doesn't predicate the game plan around kicking possession away. Make of that what you will.
At least Hogg has a bit of flair and real gas. Unlike the alternatives. His tackling can be sloppy but he's been no worse than may others in this respect. He is a potential game breaker. Gatland should just take the risk and play him, especially since nobody else looks remotely like an effective counterattacker or try scorer. Might as well go down giving it a bit of a thrash. There's really nothing to lose.
Indeed. I am not sure how you can watch Halfpenny and Hogg over the last 2/3 years and then pick Halfpenny over him.
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4226
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Lions

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

Strong Crusaders team but a huge lions team. One of the strongest packs & some big lads in the backline. If the crusaders can get parity up front, you'd have to back them for the win.
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Lions

Post by Lizard »

The Blues didn't have parity up front.

It doesn't really matter how much ball your forwards get you if all you do with it is pass it back and forth from touch to touch and run into tacklers. Line breaks will be the key. The Lions centres for this game look more likely to make a break but they need the game plan and support to do it.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Jps
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Lions

Post by Jps »

I think I read that Gats promised everyone a start in one of the first 4 games, so I would assume after the Crusaders game, we'll start seeing units form
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Lions

Post by Lizard »

Jps wrote:I think I read that Gats promised everyone a start in one of the first 4 games, so I would assume after the Crusaders game, we'll start seeing units form
They have to, really.

I assume that the first 3 match squads were basically premeditated before even getting on the plane to give everyone a start. So that leaves the Highlanders match on Tuesday to run out anyone still a bit underdone, with a shadow test side to play the Maori.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12408
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Mikey Brown »

In more Lions news- Alistair Campbell is absolutely tearing it up on question time.
Big D
Posts: 5576
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

How did Hogg do pre head knock?
OptimisticJock
Posts: 2275
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm

Re: Lions

Post by OptimisticJock »

Got pinged for holding in with his first touch but his support was nowhere to be seen. Was looking pretty handy going forward.
OptimisticJock
Posts: 2275
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm

Re: Lions

Post by OptimisticJock »

Doesn't sou d too bad for Hogg. Misses next match but nothing else mentioned.
willrob

Re: Lions

Post by willrob »

i arrive next week,it will be good from theron
Big D
Posts: 5576
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: RE: Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

OptimisticJock wrote:Doesn't sou d too bad for Hogg. Misses next match but nothing else mentioned.
It's a beaut of a black eye.
Big D
Posts: 5576
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

I would imagine is HIA failure was down to blurred vision
OptimisticJock
Posts: 2275
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm

Re: Lions

Post by OptimisticJock »

Haven't seen it but I can imagine it would be
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2210
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Spiffy »

Good hard-nosed win for the Lions based on forward power. But they still have obvious problems in attempting to score tries. It's hard to get worked up about a four to one penalty victory. They will need to come up with quite a bit more to beat the ABs. Don't see too many running threats behind the scrum, but here's hoping.
Donny osmond
Posts: 3169
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Donny osmond »

Has Hogg failed an HIA and if so does that mean he's out of the tour?

I would take boring 3-0 wins in each game for the rest of the series if it meant a winning series, only thing that matters on a lions tour is results.

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
Adder
Posts: 1817
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Adder »

Donny osmond wrote:Has Hogg failed an HIA and if so does that mean he's out of the tour?

I would take boring 3-0 wins in each game for the rest of the series if it meant a winning series, only thing that matters on a lions tour is results.

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
Only 1 game so far.
Big D
Posts: 5576
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

Seeing cheekbone specialist. Which means there is probably a more worrisome issues that a cut and a black eye.
Big D
Posts: 5576
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: RE: Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

Adder wrote:
Donny osmond wrote:Has Hogg failed an HIA and if so does that mean he's out of the tour?

I would take boring 3-0 wins in each game for the rest of the series if it meant a winning series, only thing that matters on a lions tour is results.

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
Only 1 game so far.
Yeah. Min stand down in terms of competitive games is 6 days. In theory he can play on Saturday. In reality he probably has a fractured cheekbone.
Post Reply