Borthwick’s England 2.0
Moderator: Puja
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6844
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
It now sounds like Tuilagi is available for selection but Lawrence is not - just rejoined for rehab according to BBC.
-
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:11 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
I'd be surprised if it wasn't Tuilagi/Slade then for Scotland.
-
- Posts: 1977
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Pretty certain it's in the RFU's mortgage conditions on Twickenham that if Manu's fit then he has to be crowbarred into the side.
At least we no longer act like putting him on the wing was ever a good idea.
At least we no longer act like putting him on the wing was ever a good idea.
-
- Posts: 20892
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
me either, which is a bit comedic.Margin_Walker wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 1:21 pm I'd be surprised if it wasn't Tuilagi/Slade then for Scotland.
- Puja
- Posts: 18188
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Blamire, Pearson, and Beard drop out of the squad on the full return of LCD, Martin, and Manu. Not sure I like Pearson dropping out for Martin. Smacks of lock at 6 again, which is not good news.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 1977
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Martin at lock, Chessum back to 6, roots out of the squad?
Doesn't address the issue of us possibly being chopped to bits at the breakdown.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6844
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
-
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
You'd imagine Martin would come onto the bench for Coles. Coles went into the backrow Vs Wales and Martin could do that as well as add some bulk to the engine room if it's required.
With more momentum up front you'd hope they'd be less opportunity for the opposition to attack the breakdown.
-
- Posts: 20892
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
yepFKAS wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:51 pmYou'd imagine Martin would come onto the bench for Coles. Coles went into the backrow Vs Wales and Martin could do that as well as add some bulk to the engine room if it's required.
With more momentum up front you'd hope they'd be less opportunity for the opposition to attack the breakdown.
-
- Posts: 12366
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Scotland depth in the tight 5 is piss. Having some combo of Marler/Cole/Martin come on late in the game and wreck the Scottish scrum/maul might be a good approach.
-
- Posts: 4010
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
I’d be starting a back row of C-CS, Earl and Dombrandt at 8 with Ford , Dingwall and Daly swapped out
-
- Posts: 1977
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
-
- Posts: 20892
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
- Puja
- Posts: 18188
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
I mean, you say that, but people were confidently predicting that Reffell would be stealing every bit of our ball against Wales and I think we only gave away one breakdown penalty all game. Combined with us only conceding one ruck turnover against Italy as well, it does suggest that our current back row are doing an okay job.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Really? Maybe only one penalty but Reffell stole the ball on several occasions.Puja wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 4:00 pmI mean, you say that, but people were confidently predicting that Reffell would be stealing every bit of our ball against Wales and I think we only gave away one breakdown penalty all game. Combined with us only conceding one ruck turnover against Italy as well, it does suggest that our current back row are doing an okay job.
Puja
I'd also say re 16ths point, Roots out of the squad is unlikely. Borthwick clearly likes what he brings.
-
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Refell was a pain in the arse all game. He was a very different threat than Italy had against us. It showed up the imbalance in our backrow for me. We need to really disrupt Scottish ball and that’s not really coming from Roots, Underhill, Earl. I’d be looking at Curry. We really need to threaten them there and without Lawes and missing Curry we’re not disruptive at ruck time.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6844
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Roots is a 'does what it says on the tin' type. He is reliable at the lineout - catches clean, delivers and does not get knocked about. He is a good physical presence in all areas. The odd penalty by him or any of the forwards seems not to matter much. I'm not totally convinced but he's a good balance with Underhill and Earl (neither of whom I like especially). I doubt SB will change the starting 2nd or back row - for the Scotland game anyway.FKAS wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 4:16 pmReally? Maybe only one penalty but Reffell stole the ball on several occasions.Puja wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 4:00 pmI mean, you say that, but people were confidently predicting that Reffell would be stealing every bit of our ball against Wales and I think we only gave away one breakdown penalty all game. Combined with us only conceding one ruck turnover against Italy as well, it does suggest that our current back row are doing an okay job.
Puja
I'd also say re 16ths point, Roots out of the squad is unlikely. Borthwick clearly likes what he brings.
-
- Posts: 4010
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Smith and Manu (if Lawrence not available)
2 games in against the weakest sides and Smith has had, what, 10mins?
I know we all want to win but alongside Smith we also need to give the Welsh lad some time on the wing.
- Stom
- Posts: 5939
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
It feels like Underhill is there for what he's done in the past rather than what he does now, tbh...
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6844
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16100
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
-
- Posts: 4010
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
-
- Posts: 20892
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6844
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
It's weird. I think SB has to make changes on the one hand. On the other if the main one is bringing Tuilagi back in at 12, it feels like such a backward step. The likes of him and Billy V in the short-term scenario of the RWC were understandable but in a quest for progress Dingwall should get another game - especially as Lawrence is not ready.
Where I get more contrary thoughts is in the case of the 10 shirt. I really want Fin Smith to start, again because Marcus is not ready, but SB has not prepared for that with his time off the bench so far.
I suppose SB has to be cut some slack to treat the Scotland game as a one-off - looking for a 3rd 6N win.
Where I get more contrary thoughts is in the case of the 10 shirt. I really want Fin Smith to start, again because Marcus is not ready, but SB has not prepared for that with his time off the bench so far.
I suppose SB has to be cut some slack to treat the Scotland game as a one-off - looking for a 3rd 6N win.
-
- Posts: 4010
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Eh?Banquo wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 8:54 amGood one...