Borthwick’s England 2.0

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Banquo
Posts: 20890
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:03 am Ian McGeechan, in the DT mid-week, repeated his contention that the Celtic countries live in fear of England finally getting their act together - they would simply be unable to match English resources.
In other news, pope remains catholic.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6844
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:31 am
Oakboy wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:03 am Ian McGeechan, in the DT mid-week, repeated his contention that the Celtic countries live in fear of England finally getting their act together - they would simply be unable to match English resources.
In other news, pope remains catholic.
As well as shitting in the woods? :o
LongForgotten
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:40 am

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by LongForgotten »

Puja wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:36 am
SixAndAHalf wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:06 pm This may have been shared on another thread but worth a watch for insight on Borthwicks plan:

Posted on Friday night. There's someone that gets to be smug about calling it. Hope he's right about the long-term.

Puja
I think he's a touch optimistic - not sure we have a pack who can dominate scrums, and unconvinced our wings are particularly suited to the defensive system. Nice explanation of what Borthwick might be aiming for though, and why it's being developed this way round.

I've sent the kick chase segment to several friends after years of trying to explain that there is some merit to box kicks!
p/d
Posts: 4007
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by p/d »

BBC reporting that concerns over Furbank’s ball retention might see Strward return are fucking up Puja’s m-b-m
Banquo
Posts: 20890
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:27 am
Banquo wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:31 am
Oakboy wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:03 am Ian McGeechan, in the DT mid-week, repeated his contention that the Celtic countries live in fear of England finally getting their act together - they would simply be unable to match English resources.
In other news, pope remains catholic.
As well as shitting in the woods? :o
aye :)

on a serious note, getting your act together is way more than just getting the best coach and selecting the best team available...good though that would be :)
Banquo
Posts: 20890
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Banquo »

p/d wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:31 am BBC reporting that concerns over Furbank’s ball retention might see Strward return are fucking up Puja’s m-b-m
that'd would be a pity, but can see it.
p/d
Posts: 4007
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by p/d »

Banquo wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:32 am
p/d wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:31 am BBC reporting that concerns over Furbank’s ball retention might see Strward return are fucking up Puja’s m-b-m
that'd would be a pity, but can see it.
Eh!
Think a France v England thread should be launched so Mells and FKAS can spread the love
Banquo
Posts: 20890
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Banquo »

p/d wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:43 am
Banquo wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:32 am
p/d wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:31 am BBC reporting that concerns over Furbank’s ball retention might see Strward return are fucking up Puja’s m-b-m
that'd would be a pity, but can see it.
Eh!
Think a France v England thread should be launched so Mells and FKAS can spread the love
I can see why Borthers might lean that way, not that I would.
p/d
Posts: 4007
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by p/d »

Banquo wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:44 am
p/d wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:43 am
Banquo wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:32 am

that'd would be a pity, but can see it.
Eh!
Think a France v England thread should be launched so Mells and FKAS can spread the love
I can see why Borthers might lean that way, not that I would.
Really? I can’t. The big call was giving the ‘tache a second outing not a third.
I do recall shouting out ‘ffs Furbank that was shit’, but that was more through frustration than anything else.

I know I like Steward and I think I like Furbank. However looking at the team I know I prefer Furbank
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6844
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:31 am
Oakboy wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:27 am
Banquo wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:31 am

In other news, pope remains catholic.
As well as shitting in the woods? :o
aye :)

on a serious note, getting your act together is way more than just getting the best coach and selecting the best team available...good though that would be :)
Oh, agreed - the overall picture was what Geech was referring to.
Banquo
Posts: 20890
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Banquo »

p/d wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:50 am
Banquo wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:44 am
p/d wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:43 am

Eh!
Think a France v England thread should be launched so Mells and FKAS can spread the love
I can see why Borthers might lean that way, not that I would.
Really? I can’t. The big call was giving the ‘tache a second outing not a third.
I do recall shouting out ‘ffs Furbank that was shit’, but that was more through frustration than anything else.

I know I like Steward and I think I like Furbank. However looking at the team I know I prefer Furbank
yeah but you ain't borthers :). As I said, i'd stick with the 20 minuter, but he does need to cut his error count.
FKAS
Posts: 7362
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by FKAS »

Against Ireland there was more logic for recalling Steward, not sure about against France. Particularly with how the French defence fell apart Vs Wales counter attack and that being where Furbank is most valuable to England.

Keep the starting XV and adjust the bench. Has anyone seen it France have made any adjustments to their squad?
Banquo
Posts: 20890
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Banquo »

Its a nice problem to have for a change
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2210
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Spiffy »

Oakboy wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:27 am
Banquo wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:31 am
Oakboy wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:03 am Ian McGeechan, in the DT mid-week, repeated his contention that the Celtic countries live in fear of England finally getting their act together - they would simply be unable to match English resources.
In other news, pope remains catholic.
As well as shitting in the woods? :o
And calling on the Ukraine to surrender to Russia :x
Beasties
Posts: 1553
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Beasties »

SixAndAHalf wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:06 pm This may have been shared on another thread but worth a watch for insight on Borthwicks plan:

Thanks for posting it again. Managed to get it watched this time. Cracking bit of analysis.
Veyqun
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2020 8:45 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Veyqun »

Re the Wibble rugby video, I was interested in what the defensive system requires of wingers in terms of real pace and agility, which is maybe why SA have smaller, more agile wingers (but they may just do that because they are both excellent).

It feels like IFW fits the mould perfectly. I guess it's a reason why Coka's a no. I wonder what it means for the pecking order after that (I appreciate it looks like Muir and Roebuck at the moment, but somehow that feels like a stopgap). Hopefully it suits Murley.

Any thoughts on perfect wingers for the defensive system??
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 18181
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Puja »

Veyqun wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:09 pm Re the Wibble rugby video, I was interested in what the defensive system requires of wingers in terms of real pace and agility, which is maybe why SA have smaller, more agile wingers (but they may just do that because they are both excellent).

It feels like IFW fits the mould perfectly. I guess it's a reason why Coka's a no. I wonder what it means for the pecking order after that (I appreciate it looks like Muir and Roebuck at the moment, but somehow that feels like a stopgap). Hopefully it suits Murley.

Any thoughts on perfect wingers for the defensive system??
Probably also explains why no love for Radwan right now - might not be physical enough in defence for the system? Murley you'd've said would be ideal - fast and nimble on his feet, with decent strength in attack and defence.

It's a shame that it's not 7 years ago, cause you feel someone like 2017 edition Christian Wade would've been ideal for this kind of role.

Puja
Backist Monk
Scrumhead
Posts: 5973
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Scrumhead »

I had the same thoughts on Murley. IFW has earned his spot, but Murley would be a good alternative with similar-ish qualities.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 18181
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Puja »

Another name that I think would really suit the system is Will Muir. With his 7s background, he's used to a very flexible and fast-moving defensive system, as well as needing to make one-on-one tackles in space.

Puja
Backist Monk
Timbo
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Timbo »

I reckon Marchant would have been well suited to playing both 13 & wing in this defensive system. I’m sure Borthwick would love to have him back.

Highly likely he’s perfectly happy playing in Paris, Top14, nice wage etc, but can’t help but feel a player of his quality & age should be playing test rugby in front of huge crowds & possibly for the Lions. Bit of a waste.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12354
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Mikey Brown »

Yeah. Fast, skilful, good defender, incredible kick chase/retrieval. No idea how much of it was the Eddie influence but the timing still seems weird.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16084
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Mellsblue »

Timbo wrote: Sat Mar 16, 2024 7:36 pm I reckon Marchant would have been well suited to playing both 13 & wing in this defensive system. I’m sure Borthwick would love to have him back.

Highly likely he’s perfectly happy playing in Paris, Top14, nice wage etc, but can’t help but feel a player of his quality & age should be playing test rugby in front of huge crowds & possibly for the Lions. Bit of a waste.
Eddie legacy.
SixAndAHalf
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:13 am

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by SixAndAHalf »

Where do we stand after the 6N then?

I see the basis of the team as George, Itoje, Martin, Chessum, CCS, Earl, Mitchell, Ford, Lawrence, IFW and Freeman (Watson also has a central contract).

Nobody really played themselves out of contention but I dont think Roots is international standard and Steward clearly has some work ons.

I’d like to see Hodge, Murley, Barbeary in the next squad plus we could always do with bigger props / locks (a few candidates in the u20s).

Of the players in France I agree with the above that Marchant would be a great fit for this team and obviously JWillis is a top operator.

Will TCurry or Quirke ever be fit as they would raise the squad’s ceiling.
Banquo
Posts: 20890
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote: Sat Mar 16, 2024 9:23 pm
Timbo wrote: Sat Mar 16, 2024 7:36 pm I reckon Marchant would have been well suited to playing both 13 & wing in this defensive system. I’m sure Borthwick would love to have him back.

Highly likely he’s perfectly happy playing in Paris, Top14, nice wage etc, but can’t help but feel a player of his quality & age should be playing test rugby in front of huge crowds & possibly for the Lions. Bit of a waste.
Eddie legacy.
....in fairness he went off grid before, to enzid
Banquo
Posts: 20890
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0

Post by Banquo »

SixAndAHalf wrote: Sat Mar 16, 2024 10:36 pm Where do we stand after the 6N then?

I see the basis of the team as George, Itoje, Martin, Chessum, CCS, Earl, Mitchell, Ford, Lawrence, IFW and Freeman (Watson also has a central contract).

Nobody really played themselves out of contention but I dont think Roots is international standard and Steward clearly has some work ons.

I’d like to see Hodge, Murley, Barbeary in the next squad plus we could always do with bigger props / locks (a few candidates in the u20s).

Of the players in France I agree with the above that Marchant would be a great fit for this team and obviously JWillis is a top operator.

Will TCurry or Quirke ever be fit as they would raise the squad’s ceiling.
I'd see Furbank being there too
Post Reply