Ah. Gutted. As someone said the other day he actually achieved a shitload in his career but he was robbed of a good few years more at the top. Best of luck to him.
Had a career most dream of but you still feel he could’ve achieved a hell of a lot more of it weren’t for injury. Anyone know what his plans are for the future? I’d love to see him roaming around Woburn Safari Park with the other luxury giraffes. On the plus side, it’ll save Banquo having to ask whether he’s injured every three weeks.
Mellsblue wrote:Had a career most dream of but you still feel he could’ve achieved a hell of a lot more of it weren’t for injury. Anyone know what his plans are for the future? I’d love to see him roaming around Woburn Safari Park with the other luxury giraffes. On the plus side, it’ll save Banquo having to ask whether he’s injured every three weeks.
true. Mind that was only this season, when he wasn't at all visible.
Mellsblue wrote:Had a career most dream of but you still feel he could’ve achieved a hell of a lot more of it weren’t for injury. Anyone know what his plans are for the future? I’d love to see him roaming around Woburn Safari Park with the other luxury giraffes. On the plus side, it’ll save Banquo having to ask whether he’s injured every three weeks.
Mellsblue wrote:Had a career most dream of but you still feel he could’ve achieved a hell of a lot more of it weren’t for injury. Anyone know what his plans are for the future? I’d love to see him roaming around Woburn Safari Park with the other luxury giraffes. On the plus side, it’ll save Banquo having to ask whether he’s injured every three weeks.
Croft was probably the fastest forward to play for England to date and if balanced with a complementary flanker e.g. Robshaw or Lipman, worked well. His style jarred a bit with the plodding England ‘pod’ style of the Martin Johnson/Jon Wells era and I think it suited a left and right system (such as France’s) much better than the openside - blindside style favoured by England but that’s more a reflection on the post RWC 2003 ‘hangover’ state of rugby prevailing at the time than anything else.
I think Croft's problem, and England's, was with his pace he was sent wide to support plays as they went wide. Which was weird as he wasn't often going to make a linebreak anyway, and meant we lacked support through the middle and saw moves break down before we event got a chance to go wide. The one consistently good use of him being out side though did come under Johnson who used him as a front jumper and had him stay wide and had the team quickly play back to where Croft was.
It's maybe that with his slim physique Croft wasn't trusted int he tight exchanges, but other than his body breaking a few times his form in the tight was always rather impressive imo.
Digby wrote:I think Croft's problem, and England's, was with his pace he was sent wide to support plays as they went wide. Which was weird as he wasn't often going to make a linebreak anyway, and meant we lacked support through the middle and saw moves break down before we event got a chance to go wide. The one consistently good use of him being out side though did come under Johnson who used him as a front jumper and had him stay wide and had the team quickly play back to where Croft was.
It's maybe that with his slim physique Croft wasn't trusted int he tight exchanges, but other than his body breaking a few times his form in the tight was always rather impressive imo.
agreed. When he played as a conventional flanker, he was a far more useful player. His lineout play was as good as it gets for a back-row as a sidenote.