Saracens vs Gloucester
Moderator: Puja
- Puja
- Posts: 17689
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Saracens vs Gloucester
FORWARDS: Mako Vunipola (147), Jamie George (199), Vincent Koch (42), George Kruis (160), Will Skelton (28), Maro Itoje (97), Mike Rhodes (72), Ben Earl (18).
BACKS: Liam Williams (18), David Strettle (140), Nick Tompkins (72), Brad Barritt (226), Sean Maitland (44), Owen Farrell (176), Richard Wigglesworth (213).
REPLACEMENTS: Christopher Tolofua (20), Richard Barrington (139), Titi Lamositele (54), Nick Isiewke (38), Schalk Burger (51), Ben Spencer (134), Alex Lozowski (63), Alex Goode (264).
Gloucester Rugby:
15. Jason Woodward; 14. Charlie Sharples, 13. Henry Trinder, 12. Billy Twelvetrees, 11. Matt Banahan; 10. Danny Cipriani, 9. Callum Braley; 1. Josh Hohneck, 2. Franco Marais, 3. Fraser Balmain; 4. Ed Slater (capt), 5. Gerbrandt Grobler; 6. Jake Polledri, 7. Lewis Ludlow, 8. Ruan Ackermann
Replacements:
16. James Hanson, 17. Val Rapava Ruskin, 18. Ciaran Knight, 19. Freddie Clarke, 20. Ben Morgan, 21. Ben Vellacott, 22. Mark Atkinson, 23. Tom Hudson
BACKS: Liam Williams (18), David Strettle (140), Nick Tompkins (72), Brad Barritt (226), Sean Maitland (44), Owen Farrell (176), Richard Wigglesworth (213).
REPLACEMENTS: Christopher Tolofua (20), Richard Barrington (139), Titi Lamositele (54), Nick Isiewke (38), Schalk Burger (51), Ben Spencer (134), Alex Lozowski (63), Alex Goode (264).
Gloucester Rugby:
15. Jason Woodward; 14. Charlie Sharples, 13. Henry Trinder, 12. Billy Twelvetrees, 11. Matt Banahan; 10. Danny Cipriani, 9. Callum Braley; 1. Josh Hohneck, 2. Franco Marais, 3. Fraser Balmain; 4. Ed Slater (capt), 5. Gerbrandt Grobler; 6. Jake Polledri, 7. Lewis Ludlow, 8. Ruan Ackermann
Replacements:
16. James Hanson, 17. Val Rapava Ruskin, 18. Ciaran Knight, 19. Freddie Clarke, 20. Ben Morgan, 21. Ben Vellacott, 22. Mark Atkinson, 23. Tom Hudson
Backist Monk
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Who is picking Sarries’ backrow? Andy Robinson.
-
- Posts: 12141
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Err... Eddie Jones.
-
- Posts: 5893
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Rhodes at 7....its definitely the way forward.
Acid test for Glos: are they serious top 4 contenders? The game could help us find out. Expecting quite a battle.
Acid test for Glos: are they serious top 4 contenders? The game could help us find out. Expecting quite a battle.
-
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
What happened to billy?
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Can't show his face after getting bounced by a back
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
As it's going to be chucking down with rain on Sunday, I'm not sure this will be the greatest spectacle.
- Puja
- Posts: 17689
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Saracens are doing a lot of rotation early season, although I've noticed that that still doesn't apply to Mako.twitchy wrote:What happened to billy?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Hard to ignore the Sarries tight five, even if it's arguably a tight seven
- Gloskarlos
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
All about the Glos performance for me this one. Win lose or draw (and I expect a loss) if glos can play for 80 mins believing they are in the same class as sarries, executing the game plan well, I’ll be quite happy.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6372
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Yes. Itoje at 6 hardly gets a mention. I wonder if he actually prefers playing there.Digby wrote:Hard to ignore the Sarries tight five, even if it's arguably a tight seven
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Rhodes at 7 FFS. I hope Polledri, Ludlow and Ackermann can highlight what a properly balanced back row can bring.
- CONVEX HULL
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:07 pm
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Wray recovering from his 'headlock', Billy V unavailable due to a scheduled medical procedure.
-
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Glos should be wearing red.
-
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Ref not doing glos any favours but sarries are relentless.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
First scrum of the game after 29 mins. Allianz Park just looks like a horrible place to go doesn’t it?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Unbelievable how much ball 12t is taking at first receiver. If you didn’t know better you’d say he was playing 10.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6372
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Saracens pack have outplayed their opponents by an extent that is stunning. Man-for-man, on paper, the Gloucester forwards look competitive but collectively they have bern mashed.
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Yeah, it's been pretty difficult to judge Farrell vs Cipriani when Sarries pack has been so so dominant
-
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Sarries would have beaten any team in the league on that form.
-
- Posts: 5893
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Bit of a reality check for Glos. They'll be very disappointed with that effort. 2nd best by quite a way.
Saracens just too good, typically efficient and very disciplined.
Saracens just too good, typically efficient and very disciplined.
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Yep. Very noticeable. I think they were trying to protect Cipriani from Saracens line speed and try to get him to free up Sharples and Woodward in the wide channels but it didn’t really work.Mellsblue wrote:Unbelievable how much ball 12t is taking at first receiver. If you didn’t know better you’d say he was playing 10.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
Not in the slightest!!Scrumhead wrote:Yep. Very noticeable. I think they were trying to protect Cipriani from Saracens line speed and try to get him to free up Sharples and Woodward in the wide channels but it didn’t really work.Mellsblue wrote:Unbelievable how much ball 12t is taking at first receiver. If you didn’t know better you’d say he was playing 10.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Saracens vs Gloucester
It's not impossible to overcome a big deficit in the tight five, but today wasn't one of the those occasions