Saracens vs Gloucester

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17689
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Puja »

FORWARDS: Mako Vunipola (147), Jamie George (199), Vincent Koch (42), George Kruis (160), Will Skelton (28), Maro Itoje (97), Mike Rhodes (72), Ben Earl (18).

BACKS: Liam Williams (18), David Strettle (140), Nick Tompkins (72), Brad Barritt (226), Sean Maitland (44), Owen Farrell (176), Richard Wigglesworth (213).

REPLACEMENTS: Christopher Tolofua (20), Richard Barrington (139), Titi Lamositele (54), Nick Isiewke (38), Schalk Burger (51), Ben Spencer (134), Alex Lozowski (63), Alex Goode (264).


Gloucester Rugby:

15. Jason Woodward; 14. Charlie Sharples, 13. Henry Trinder, 12. Billy Twelvetrees, 11. Matt Banahan; 10. Danny Cipriani, 9. Callum Braley; 1. Josh Hohneck, 2. Franco Marais, 3. Fraser Balmain; 4. Ed Slater (capt), 5. Gerbrandt Grobler; 6. Jake Polledri, 7. Lewis Ludlow, 8. Ruan Ackermann

Replacements:
16. James Hanson, 17. Val Rapava Ruskin, 18. Ciaran Knight, 19. Freddie Clarke, 20. Ben Morgan, 21. Ben Vellacott, 22. Mark Atkinson, 23. Tom Hudson
Backist Monk
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Mellsblue »

Who is picking Sarries’ backrow? Andy Robinson.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12141
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Mikey Brown »

Err... Eddie Jones.
fivepointer
Posts: 5893
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by fivepointer »

Rhodes at 7....its definitely the way forward.

Acid test for Glos: are they serious top 4 contenders? The game could help us find out. Expecting quite a battle.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by twitchy »

What happened to billy?
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1695
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Adam_P »

Can't show his face after getting bounced by a back
Peej
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Peej »

As it's going to be chucking down with rain on Sunday, I'm not sure this will be the greatest spectacle.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17689
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Puja »

twitchy wrote:What happened to billy?
Saracens are doing a lot of rotation early season, although I've noticed that that still doesn't apply to Mako.

Puja
Backist Monk
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Digby »

Hard to ignore the Sarries tight five, even if it's arguably a tight seven
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Gloskarlos »

All about the Glos performance for me this one. Win lose or draw (and I expect a loss) if glos can play for 80 mins believing they are in the same class as sarries, executing the game plan well, I’ll be quite happy.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6372
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Oakboy »

Digby wrote:Hard to ignore the Sarries tight five, even if it's arguably a tight seven
Yes. Itoje at 6 hardly gets a mention. I wonder if he actually prefers playing there.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Scrumhead »

Rhodes at 7 FFS. I hope Polledri, Ludlow and Ackermann can highlight what a properly balanced back row can bring.
User avatar
CONVEX HULL
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:07 pm

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by CONVEX HULL »

Wray recovering from his 'headlock', Billy V unavailable due to a scheduled medical procedure.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by twitchy »

Glos should be wearing red.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by twitchy »

Ref not doing glos any favours but sarries are relentless.
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Timbo »

First scrum of the game after 29 mins. Allianz Park just looks like a horrible place to go doesn’t it?
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Mellsblue »

Unbelievable how much ball 12t is taking at first receiver. If you didn’t know better you’d say he was playing 10.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Mellsblue »

Ouch!!
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6372
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Oakboy »

Saracens pack have outplayed their opponents by an extent that is stunning. Man-for-man, on paper, the Gloucester forwards look competitive but collectively they have bern mashed.
Renniks
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Renniks »

Yeah, it's been pretty difficult to judge Farrell vs Cipriani when Sarries pack has been so so dominant
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by twitchy »

Sarries would have beaten any team in the league on that form.
fivepointer
Posts: 5893
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by fivepointer »

Bit of a reality check for Glos. They'll be very disappointed with that effort. 2nd best by quite a way.
Saracens just too good, typically efficient and very disciplined.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Scrumhead »

Mellsblue wrote:Unbelievable how much ball 12t is taking at first receiver. If you didn’t know better you’d say he was playing 10.
Yep. Very noticeable. I think they were trying to protect Cipriani from Saracens line speed and try to get him to free up Sharples and Woodward in the wide channels but it didn’t really work.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Mellsblue »

Scrumhead wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:Unbelievable how much ball 12t is taking at first receiver. If you didn’t know better you’d say he was playing 10.
Yep. Very noticeable. I think they were trying to protect Cipriani from Saracens line speed and try to get him to free up Sharples and Woodward in the wide channels but it didn’t really work.
Not in the slightest!!
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Saracens vs Gloucester

Post by Digby »

It's not impossible to overcome a big deficit in the tight five, but today wasn't one of the those occasions
Post Reply