Bath vs Saints

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17689
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Bath vs Saints

Post by Puja »

Bath: Atkins; Rokoduguni, Brew; Willison, Cokanasiga; Burns, Green; Catt, Dunn, Thomas, Attwood, Charteris (capt), Ellis, Underhill, Faletau

Replacements: Walker, van Rooyen, Perenise, Stooke, Mercer, Cook, Priestland, Wright

Northampton: Tuala; Naiyaravoro, Symons, Francis, Collins; Biggar, Reinach; Waller (co-capt), Hartley (co-capt), Franks, Ribbans, Lawes, Gibson, Ludlam, Harrison

Replacements: Haywood, Van Wyk, Painter, Ratuniyarawa, Eadie, Mitchell, Kellaway, Mallinder
Backist Monk
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Mellsblue »

Had to check that Bath team. Brew is at OC. The layout looks like Cokanasiga at IC.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12142
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Mikey Brown »

He’ll be playing inside centre in France in a few years, mark my words. All the best wingers do.
Peej
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Peej »

Mikey Brown wrote:He’ll be playing inside centre in France in a few years, mark my words. All the best wingers do.
A hint to your next career move, MB?
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Scrumhead »

Good to see Ludlam getting a start for Saints.

I’m amazed Mercer got dropped to the bench after a top performance against Quins.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9156
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Which Tyler »

Scrumhead wrote:Good to see Ludlam getting a start for Saints.

I’m amazed Mercer got dropped to the bench after a top performance against Quins.
He didn't - Blackadder actually believes in squad rotation - he's done it whenever he's had the chance - which means about 3 times; but has always talked a good game about it, and actually given the impression that he believes in it too.
Equally, Attwood and Faletau weren't dropped last week either, just rested.

Interview with Zach: https://www.rugbypass.com/news/big-jims ... ach-mercer
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Scrumhead »

Rotation or not, he deserved to keep his place IMO.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Digby »

The season is so long rotation is an imperative, and you might as well do it when you're able rather than wait and find yourself in an injury crisis. Doesn’t solve the problem of mental fatigue, but it's good to see it nonetheless
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17689
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Puja »

I think Blackadder still reeling from the idea of having more than 23 fit players and actually being able to select. No wonder he's getting his rotation in where he can.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Mellsblue »

He does a couple of seasons worth of rotation to catch up on.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9156
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Which Tyler »

Scrumhead wrote:Rotation or not, he deserved to keep his place IMO.
That's... not how rotation works
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1695
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Adam_P »

Scrumhead wrote:Good to see Ludlam getting a start for Saints.
Both Haskell and Brussow have injury or concussion issues, so the hand was forced really in starting Ludlam. Unfortunately, I don't think this will be a game where Ludlam is likely to shine based on what the weather is doing. Think we might miss Brussow, he has been very good so far this season. Saints back 5 is pretty lightweight in comparison to Baths, so it could be a bit of a challenge in the wet.

I'm hoping Saints can get Naiyaravoro involved a bit more than last week - I'd like to see him running hard lines in mid-field rather than waiting on his wing. Also looking forward to seeing Kellaway play in the first team - think he will be pushing hard at 13 or 15 in a few weeks time.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1695
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Adam_P »

I'll eat my words, Ludlam is going very well so far. Symons having a good game at 13 too, much better than Burrell as he is doing the basics well
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Digby »

Adam_P wrote:[


I'm hoping Saints can get Naiyaravoro involved a bit more than last week - I'd like to see him running hard lines in mid-field rather than waiting on his wing.
I know what you mean in both the impact he can have and boosting his involvement but if I were defending him I'd rather do that up the middle too. What you really want is getting usable ball wide to him and then being able to support and go again, but that's not the English way
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1695
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Adam_P »

He seems to like not being on his wing in defence, so it shouldn't be too hard for him to do it in attack.

7 all at the start of the 2nd half. Kellaway on for Symons.
fivepointer
Posts: 5893
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by fivepointer »

Just a conversion in it at the end. Another try for Cokanasiga, who is having a tremendous start to the season.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17689
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Puja »

Just seen the highlights. What a fantastic pass from Stooke for Cokanasiga's try - if that'd been Cipriani's we'd've been singing its praises, let alone from a lock.

Puja
Backist Monk
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12142
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Mikey Brown »

Adam_P wrote:He seems to like not being on his wing in defence, so it shouldn't be too hard for him to do it in attack.

7 all at the start of the 2nd half. Kellaway on for Symons.
Ha. I’m really going to enjoy seeing how you go this season trying to predict him. With Northampton teetering so precariously between being totally awful and quite dangerous he is just the man to swing it wildly in one direction or the other.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9156
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Which Tyler »

That was a bit of a squeaky bum - couple of bits of magic from Roko; but otherwise... tense rather than necessarily entertaining.
Very please to see that Bath actually seem to have a line-out now, for the first time since Borthwick left!
I'm guessing the wind must have been pretty terrible - so many errors, and a notable difference on kick length (and lineout throwing) going left to right versus right to left; but so many errors.
Freddie is getting this team clicking a bit more; but he'll need to find some goalkicking boots to be secure as first choice; especially in whether conditions like Saturday.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12142
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Mikey Brown »

Which Tyler wrote:That was a bit of a squeaky bum - couple of bits of magic from Roko; but otherwise... tense rather than necessarily entertaining.
Very please to see that Bath actually seem to have a line-out now, for the first time since Borthwick left!
I'm guessing the wind must have been pretty terrible - so many errors, and a notable difference on kick length (and lineout throwing) going left to right versus right to left; but so many errors.
Freddie is getting this team clicking a bit more; but he'll need to find some goalkicking boots to be secure as first choice; especially in whether conditions like Saturday.
It's perhaps too simple but is it Charteris making the difference? You'd think Garvey is nailed on, given the last few seasons, but Attwood and Mercer/Ellis seem to be playing very well so it'll be interesting to see what your first choice team looks like if everyone is ever fit all at once.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17689
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Puja »

Which Tyler wrote:That was a bit of a squeaky bum - couple of bits of magic from Roko; but otherwise... tense rather than necessarily entertaining.
Very please to see that Bath actually seem to have a line-out now, for the first time since Borthwick left!
I'm guessing the wind must have been pretty terrible - so many errors, and a notable difference on kick length (and lineout throwing) going left to right versus right to left; but so many errors.
Freddie is getting this team clicking a bit more; but he'll need to find some goalkicking boots to be secure as first choice; especially in whether conditions like Saturday.
I wouldn't be too harsh on Burns's kicking - the weather and wind was such that in the first half he was lucky to even get it starting in the right direction.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9156
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Bath vs Saints

Post by Which Tyler »

Puja wrote:I wouldn't be too harsh on Burns's kicking - the weather and wind was such that in the first half he was lucky to even get it starting in the right direction.
Not just this game; I think they said he was at 50% for the season - albeit early days
Post Reply