The "get rid of the coach"poll returns
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 11:12 pm
Having missed out last year, it's back. Please select the point at which you will want EJ to be sacked.
The RugbyRebels Messageboard
http://rugbyrebels.club/
twitchy wrote:...I think england will do pretty badly this 6N but I still wouldn't sack him. Who would you get in?
Sarries have been going well- lots in the pack yesterdayOakboy wrote:It does make one question the significance of performances in the European club competition. How does one put it all into context, especially if there is any merit in Jones's claim that we will improve a lot more? There have been numerous instances in the past of peaking too early so has Jones got his timing right?
And quite a few players from Exeter, who managed somehow to avoid winning their first two games, which would've seen them through comfortably. They were hardly off the pace, just crap at closing out victories.Banquo wrote:Sarries have been going well- lots in the pack yesterdayOakboy wrote:It does make one question the significance of performances in the European club competition. How does one put it all into context, especially if there is any merit in Jones's claim that we will improve a lot more? There have been numerous instances in the past of peaking too early so has Jones got his timing right?
aye-ishPuja wrote:And quite a few players from Exeter, who managed somehow to avoid winning their first two games, which would've seen them through comfortably. They were hardly off the pace, just crap at closing out victories.Banquo wrote:Sarries have been going well- lots in the pack yesterdayOakboy wrote:It does make one question the significance of performances in the European club competition. How does one put it all into context, especially if there is any merit in Jones's claim that we will improve a lot more? There have been numerous instances in the past of peaking too early so has Jones got his timing right?
Puja
Three of them. And five Tigers who have been monumentally shite. That said it is not as simple as translating overall club performance against international, or player performance.Puja wrote:And quite a few players from Exeter, who managed somehow to avoid winning their first two games, which would've seen them through comfortably. They were hardly off the pace, just crap at closing out victories.Banquo wrote:Sarries have been going well- lots in the pack yesterdayOakboy wrote:It does make one question the significance of performances in the European club competition. How does one put it all into context, especially if there is any merit in Jones's claim that we will improve a lot more? There have been numerous instances in the past of peaking too early so has Jones got his timing right?
Puja
4- LCD, Williams, Nowell, Slade....Epaminondas Pules wrote:Three of them. And five Tigers who have been monumentally shite. That said it is not as simple as translating overall club performance against international, or player performance.Puja wrote:And quite a few players from Exeter, who managed somehow to avoid winning their first two games, which would've seen them through comfortably. They were hardly off the pace, just crap at closing out victories.Banquo wrote: Sarries have been going well- lots in the pack yesterday
Puja
And 4 Leicester players: Youngs, Ford, Manu, May.Banquo wrote:4- LCD, Williams, Nowell, Slade....Epaminondas Pules wrote:Three of them. And five Tigers who have been monumentally shite. That said it is not as simple as translating overall club performance against international, or player performance.Puja wrote:
And quite a few players from Exeter, who managed somehow to avoid winning their first two games, which would've seen them through comfortably. They were hardly off the pace, just crap at closing out victories.
Puja
Well, okay, if you want to be accurate about it.Digby wrote:And Geenge
....it would read GengePuja wrote:Well, okay, if you want to be accurate about it.Digby wrote:And Geenge
Puja
I did wonder about an edit but left it alone to allow for some humour, someone may yet attempt just thatBanquo wrote:....it would read GengePuja wrote:Well, okay, if you want to be accurate about it.Digby wrote:And Geenge
Puja
Fuck off! Twat!Stom wrote:I forgive you Eugene.
Eddie out. What the fuck was that
Totally agree. Though there is an argument to say it was a test from EJ. Either way it failed.fivepointer wrote:Eddie isnt going anywhere, but i think his tactical guidance and lack of use of the bench today are faults that are his alone.
Honestly, is it just that you can’t handle losing? We’re all probably a bit het up after the game, but you seem to be on a bit of a wind up at the moment. Take a break.Stom wrote:I forgive you Eugene.
Eddie out. What the fuck was that
I'm sorry if it seems that way, but Eddie is paid good money to make decisions. It was obvious that we were struggling with the gameplan as it was. So we needed to change it. But no-one changed anything. It's his job to change thing, but we left ALL our back subs on the bench, Moon (a player who was blowing after 55 minutes) on until after 70, and didn't change a single thing about the gameplan.Timbo wrote:Honestly, is it just that you can’t handle losing? We’re all probably a bit het up after the game, but you seem to be on a bit of a wind up at the moment. Take a break.Stom wrote:I forgive you Eugene.
Eddie out. What the fuck was that