Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Moderator: Puja
- Gloskarlos
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm
Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
15. Jason Woodward; 14. Tom Marshall, 13. Chris Harris, 12. Billy Twelvetrees, 11. Ollie Thorley; 10. Danny Cipriani, 9. Willi Heinz (capt); 1. Josh Hohneck, 2. Franco Marais, 3. Fraser Balmain; 4. Alex Craig, 5. Franco Mostert; 6. Freddie Clarke, 7. Jake Polledri, 8. Ruan Ackermann
Replacements:
16. Todd Gleave, 17. Alex Seville, 18. Ciaran Knight, 19. Gerbrandt Grobler, 20. Lewis Ludlow, 21. Joe Simpson, 22. Owen Williams, 23. Louis Rees-Zammit
Unavailable for selection: Mark Atkinson, Ruan Dreyer, Jamal Ford-Robinson, Corné Fourie, James Hanson, Jaco Kriel, Ben Morgan, Val Rapava Ruskin, Charlie Sharples, Ed Slater, Henry Trinder
15. Tom Homer
14. Semesa Rokoduguni
13. Jonathan Joseph
12. Jamie Roberts
11. Anthony Watson
10. Rhys Priestland
9. Chris Cook
1. Beno Obano
2. Tom Dunn
3. Will Stuart
4. Josh McNally
5. Elliott Stooke
6. Francois Louw (C)
7. Sam Underhill
8. Taulupe Faletau
Replacements
16. Jack Walker, 17. Lewis Boyce, 18. Christian Judge, 19. Mike Williams, 20. Tom Ellis, 21. Ollie Fox, 22. Freddie Burns, 23. Aled Brew
Replacements:
16. Todd Gleave, 17. Alex Seville, 18. Ciaran Knight, 19. Gerbrandt Grobler, 20. Lewis Ludlow, 21. Joe Simpson, 22. Owen Williams, 23. Louis Rees-Zammit
Unavailable for selection: Mark Atkinson, Ruan Dreyer, Jamal Ford-Robinson, Corné Fourie, James Hanson, Jaco Kriel, Ben Morgan, Val Rapava Ruskin, Charlie Sharples, Ed Slater, Henry Trinder
15. Tom Homer
14. Semesa Rokoduguni
13. Jonathan Joseph
12. Jamie Roberts
11. Anthony Watson
10. Rhys Priestland
9. Chris Cook
1. Beno Obano
2. Tom Dunn
3. Will Stuart
4. Josh McNally
5. Elliott Stooke
6. Francois Louw (C)
7. Sam Underhill
8. Taulupe Faletau
Replacements
16. Jack Walker, 17. Lewis Boyce, 18. Christian Judge, 19. Mike Williams, 20. Tom Ellis, 21. Ollie Fox, 22. Freddie Burns, 23. Aled Brew
- Gloskarlos
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Two impressive sets of backs... I fear front row is where we may come unstuck tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Great backrow battleGloskarlos wrote:Two impressive sets of backs... I fear front row is where we may come unstuck tomorrow.
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1710
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
The Louw, Underhill and Faletau backrow has a lovely balance to it - got to be the best back row combo in the league?
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
although it might have JNGF blowing a gasket over the numbering.Adam_P wrote:The Louw, Underhill and Faletau backrow has a lovely balance to it - got to be the best back row combo in the league?
Definitely helps having three top internationals there

-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
....and Polledri rightly motm. Cips both classy and careless.Banquo wrote:although it might have JNGF blowing a gasket over the numbering.Adam_P wrote:The Louw, Underhill and Faletau backrow has a lovely balance to it - got to be the best back row combo in the league?
Definitely helps having three top internationals there
Baths attack underachieves and too many tackles missed
-
- Posts: 5896
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Bath really do need to do far more with the ball they win, and to be far more clinical and composed in their opponents 22.
Glos defended well and turned the tide with Polledri leading the way. Cips was certainly a mixed bag.
From an England POV, Stuart advanced his case for a call into the 6N squad.
Glos defended well and turned the tide with Polledri leading the way. Cips was certainly a mixed bag.
From an England POV, Stuart advanced his case for a call into the 6N squad.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
A Bath backline with Watson/Joseph/Roko should be doing a lot better. Don't really see what the lumbering Roberts at 12 brings to the party any more.fivepointer wrote:Bath really do need to do far more with the ball they win, and to be far more clinical and composed in their opponents 22.
Glos defended well and turned the tide with Polledri leading the way. Cips was certainly a mixed bag.
From an England POV, Stuart advanced his case for a call into the 6N squad.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Cook is a rank average (being kind) passer, and Priestland plays so far behind the gain line I don’t think he could see it with binoculars. Basically kills their attack stone dead.
Will Stuart and Tom Dunn could be right in the England squad mix.
Will Stuart and Tom Dunn could be right in the England squad mix.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14564
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Yep. Thought they were both excellent. Their mate at lh wasn’t too far behind.Timbo wrote:Will Stuart and Tom Dunn could be right in the England squad mix.
Both Joseph and Watson were top class; though, Joseph did fall off a couple of tackles.
- Gloskarlos
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Happy our front row survived, much better second half, nobody carries like polledri. Agree, for all Baths ball I wasn’t really worried about conceding tries at any time other than Taulupe’s break, fairly toothless. Glos do have to stop conceding stupid pens tho, gifting points and territory week in week out.
-
- Posts: 5984
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Agreed. Both have been good all season and are good all-rounders with solid basics and some ability in the loose too.Timbo wrote:Will Stuart and Tom Dunn could be right in the England squad mix.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
he did, but one was Polledri being driven on by two other Glaws playersMellsblue wrote:Yep. Thought they were both excellent. Their mate at lh wasn’t too far behind.Timbo wrote:Will Stuart and Tom Dunn could be right in the England squad mix.
Both Joseph and Watson were top class; though, Joseph did fall off a couple of tackles.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14564
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Knew that might garner a response from you.Banquo wrote:he did, but one was Polledri being driven on by two other Glaws playersMellsblue wrote:Yep. Thought they were both excellent. Their mate at lh wasn’t too far behind.Timbo wrote:Will Stuart and Tom Dunn could be right in the England squad mix.
Both Joseph and Watson were top class; though, Joseph did fall off a couple of tackles.

Last edited by Mellsblue on Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
This- Healey was banging on about Priestland running onto the ball, ignoring that he was starting where a 10 would have been in the 60s, so every time Bath were trying moves, they were so deep glaws could just watch them and close it down at their leisure and behind a normal tackle line mostlyTimbo wrote:Cook is a rank average (being kind) passer, and Priestland plays so far behind the gain line I don’t think he could see it with binoculars. Basically kills their attack stone dead.
.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14564
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Coupled with the Bath forwards not even looking for offloads or passes and it was all a bit predictable.Banquo wrote:This- Healey was banging on about Priestland running onto the ball, ignoring that he was starting where a 10 would have been in the 60s, so every time Bath were trying moves, they were so deep glaws could just watch them and close it down at their leisure and behind a normal tackle line mostlyTimbo wrote:Cook is a rank average (being kind) passer, and Priestland plays so far behind the gain line I don’t think he could see it with binoculars. Basically kills their attack stone dead.
.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
it wasnt his best game, though he looked sharper running. He had to work hard in defence and it showedMellsblue wrote:Knew that might garner a response from you.Banquo wrote:he did, but one was Polledri being driven on by two other Glaws playersMellsblue wrote: Yep. Thought they were both excellent. Their mate at lh wasn’t too far behind.
Both Joseph and Watson were top class; though, Joseph did fall off a couple of tackles.Now just waiting for Dors to tell me Slade would’ve dump tackled all three.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
I don't think Slade would have been caught by Polledri once he was a good yard clear but Joseph was in the first half. I still think Joseph is a yard short of his pace of 3/4 years ago, not that it makes him a bad player, just a slower one.Mellsblue wrote:Knew that might garner a response from you.Banquo wrote:he did, but one was Polledri being driven on by two other Glaws playersMellsblue wrote: Yep. Thought they were both excellent. Their mate at lh wasn’t too far behind.
Both Joseph and Watson were top class; though, Joseph did fall off a couple of tackles.Now just waiting for Dors to tell me Slade would’ve dump tackled all three.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Possibly and probablyOakboy wrote:I don't think Slade would have been caught by Polledri once he was a good yard clear but Joseph was in the first half. I still think Joseph is a yard short of his pace of 3/4 years ago, not that it makes him a bad player, just a slower one.Mellsblue wrote:Knew that might garner a response from you.Banquo wrote: he did, but one was Polledri being driven on by two other Glaws playersNow just waiting for Dors to tell me Slade would’ve dump tackled all three.

-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
Slade is reasonably quick, but I’m having a hard time believing he’s quicker than Joseph.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
I think he's quicker than Joseph is now but it's only opinion based on observation. Injuries have affected both. I think Slade has come back quicker and stronger than he used to be. So far, I think Joseph has lost pace. Based on age and injury-records, I suspect that Joseph might not get any quicker as he recovers but Slade still might. I really hope that I'm wrong about Joseph, mind, but their international selection record of late tends to confirm it perhaps.Timbo wrote:Slade is reasonably quick, but I’m having a hard time believing he’s quicker than Joseph.
I admit to have not rated Joseph a few years back and then changed my mind following so many being convinced about him. 3 or 4 years back he was arguably the best centre defensively as well as one of the best in attack. Now, he has lost a little something, IMO, but I really hope he can regain it.
-
- Posts: 12155
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm
I think Joseph is still quicker off the mark (possibly not over the distance) but that’s the one that tends to matter more.