Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Gloskarlos »

15. Jason Woodward; 14. Tom Marshall, 13. Chris Harris, 12. Billy Twelvetrees, 11. Ollie Thorley; 10. Danny Cipriani, 9. Willi Heinz (capt); 1. Josh Hohneck, 2. Franco Marais, 3. Fraser Balmain; 4. Alex Craig, 5. Franco Mostert; 6. Freddie Clarke, 7. Jake Polledri, 8. Ruan Ackermann

Replacements:
16. Todd Gleave, 17. Alex Seville, 18. Ciaran Knight, 19. Gerbrandt Grobler, 20. Lewis Ludlow, 21. Joe Simpson, 22. Owen Williams, 23. Louis Rees-Zammit

Unavailable for selection: Mark Atkinson, Ruan Dreyer, Jamal Ford-Robinson, Corné Fourie, James Hanson, Jaco Kriel, Ben Morgan, Val Rapava Ruskin, Charlie Sharples, Ed Slater, Henry Trinder

15. Tom Homer
14. Semesa Rokoduguni
13. Jonathan Joseph
12. Jamie Roberts
11. Anthony Watson
10. Rhys Priestland
9. Chris Cook
1. Beno Obano
2. Tom Dunn
3. Will Stuart
4. Josh McNally
5. Elliott Stooke
6. Francois Louw (C)
7. Sam Underhill
8. Taulupe Faletau
Replacements
16. Jack Walker, 17. Lewis Boyce, 18. Christian Judge, 19. Mike Williams, 20. Tom Ellis, 21. Ollie Fox, 22. Freddie Burns, 23. Aled Brew
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Gloskarlos »

Two impressive sets of backs... I fear front row is where we may come unstuck tomorrow.
Banquo
Posts: 19149
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Banquo »

Gloskarlos wrote:Two impressive sets of backs... I fear front row is where we may come unstuck tomorrow.
Great backrow battle
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1710
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Adam_P »

The Louw, Underhill and Faletau backrow has a lovely balance to it - got to be the best back row combo in the league?
Banquo
Posts: 19149
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Banquo »

Adam_P wrote:The Louw, Underhill and Faletau backrow has a lovely balance to it - got to be the best back row combo in the league?
although it might have JNGF blowing a gasket over the numbering.

Definitely helps having three top internationals there :)
Banquo
Posts: 19149
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Banquo »

Banquo wrote:
Adam_P wrote:The Louw, Underhill and Faletau backrow has a lovely balance to it - got to be the best back row combo in the league?
although it might have JNGF blowing a gasket over the numbering.

Definitely helps having three top internationals there :)
....and Polledri rightly motm. Cips both classy and careless.

Baths attack underachieves and too many tackles missed
fivepointer
Posts: 5896
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by fivepointer »

Bath really do need to do far more with the ball they win, and to be far more clinical and composed in their opponents 22.
Glos defended well and turned the tide with Polledri leading the way. Cips was certainly a mixed bag.
From an England POV, Stuart advanced his case for a call into the 6N squad.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1986
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Spiffy »

fivepointer wrote:Bath really do need to do far more with the ball they win, and to be far more clinical and composed in their opponents 22.
Glos defended well and turned the tide with Polledri leading the way. Cips was certainly a mixed bag.
From an England POV, Stuart advanced his case for a call into the 6N squad.
A Bath backline with Watson/Joseph/Roko should be doing a lot better. Don't really see what the lumbering Roberts at 12 brings to the party any more.
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Timbo »

Cook is a rank average (being kind) passer, and Priestland plays so far behind the gain line I don’t think he could see it with binoculars. Basically kills their attack stone dead.

Will Stuart and Tom Dunn could be right in the England squad mix.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14564
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Mellsblue »

Timbo wrote:Will Stuart and Tom Dunn could be right in the England squad mix.
Yep. Thought they were both excellent. Their mate at lh wasn’t too far behind.
Both Joseph and Watson were top class; though, Joseph did fall off a couple of tackles.
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Gloskarlos »

Happy our front row survived, much better second half, nobody carries like polledri. Agree, for all Baths ball I wasn’t really worried about conceding tries at any time other than Taulupe’s break, fairly toothless. Glos do have to stop conceding stupid pens tho, gifting points and territory week in week out.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5984
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Scrumhead »

Timbo wrote:Will Stuart and Tom Dunn could be right in the England squad mix.
Agreed. Both have been good all season and are good all-rounders with solid basics and some ability in the loose too.
Banquo
Posts: 19149
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:
Timbo wrote:Will Stuart and Tom Dunn could be right in the England squad mix.
Yep. Thought they were both excellent. Their mate at lh wasn’t too far behind.
Both Joseph and Watson were top class; though, Joseph did fall off a couple of tackles.
he did, but one was Polledri being driven on by two other Glaws players
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14564
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Timbo wrote:Will Stuart and Tom Dunn could be right in the England squad mix.
Yep. Thought they were both excellent. Their mate at lh wasn’t too far behind.
Both Joseph and Watson were top class; though, Joseph did fall off a couple of tackles.
he did, but one was Polledri being driven on by two other Glaws players
Knew that might garner a response from you. ;) Now just waiting for Dors to tell me Slade would’ve dump tackled all three.
Last edited by Mellsblue on Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Banquo
Posts: 19149
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Banquo »

Timbo wrote:Cook is a rank average (being kind) passer, and Priestland plays so far behind the gain line I don’t think he could see it with binoculars. Basically kills their attack stone dead.
.
This- Healey was banging on about Priestland running onto the ball, ignoring that he was starting where a 10 would have been in the 60s, so every time Bath were trying moves, they were so deep glaws could just watch them and close it down at their leisure and behind a normal tackle line mostly
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14564
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Timbo wrote:Cook is a rank average (being kind) passer, and Priestland plays so far behind the gain line I don’t think he could see it with binoculars. Basically kills their attack stone dead.
.
This- Healey was banging on about Priestland running onto the ball, ignoring that he was starting where a 10 would have been in the 60s, so every time Bath were trying moves, they were so deep glaws could just watch them and close it down at their leisure and behind a normal tackle line mostly
Coupled with the Bath forwards not even looking for offloads or passes and it was all a bit predictable.
Banquo
Posts: 19149
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote: Yep. Thought they were both excellent. Their mate at lh wasn’t too far behind.
Both Joseph and Watson were top class; though, Joseph did fall off a couple of tackles.
he did, but one was Polledri being driven on by two other Glaws players
Knew that might garner a response from you. ;) Now just waiting for Dors to tell me Slade would’ve dump tackled all three.
it wasnt his best game, though he looked sharper running. He had to work hard in defence and it showed
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Oakboy »

Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote: Yep. Thought they were both excellent. Their mate at lh wasn’t too far behind.
Both Joseph and Watson were top class; though, Joseph did fall off a couple of tackles.
he did, but one was Polledri being driven on by two other Glaws players
Knew that might garner a response from you. ;) Now just waiting for Dors to tell me Slade would’ve dump tackled all three.
I don't think Slade would have been caught by Polledri once he was a good yard clear but Joseph was in the first half. I still think Joseph is a yard short of his pace of 3/4 years ago, not that it makes him a bad player, just a slower one.
Banquo
Posts: 19149
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote: he did, but one was Polledri being driven on by two other Glaws players
Knew that might garner a response from you. ;) Now just waiting for Dors to tell me Slade would’ve dump tackled all three.
I don't think Slade would have been caught by Polledri once he was a good yard clear but Joseph was in the first half. I still think Joseph is a yard short of his pace of 3/4 years ago, not that it makes him a bad player, just a slower one.
Possibly and probably :)
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Timbo »

Slade is reasonably quick, but I’m having a hard time believing he’s quicker than Joseph.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Oakboy »

Timbo wrote:Slade is reasonably quick, but I’m having a hard time believing he’s quicker than Joseph.
I think he's quicker than Joseph is now but it's only opinion based on observation. Injuries have affected both. I think Slade has come back quicker and stronger than he used to be. So far, I think Joseph has lost pace. Based on age and injury-records, I suspect that Joseph might not get any quicker as he recovers but Slade still might. I really hope that I'm wrong about Joseph, mind, but their international selection record of late tends to confirm it perhaps.

I admit to have not rated Joseph a few years back and then changed my mind following so many being convinced about him. 3 or 4 years back he was arguably the best centre defensively as well as one of the best in attack. Now, he has lost a little something, IMO, but I really hope he can regain it.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12155
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Glos v Bath Sat 3 pm

Post by Mikey Brown »

I think Joseph is still quicker off the mark (possibly not over the distance) but that’s the one that tends to matter more.
Post Reply