Page 1 of 1

Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 7:19 pm
by fivepointer
Sale Sharks: Haley; Brady, James, Leota, Edwards; Cipriani, Stringer; Harrison, Taylor, Cobilas, Evans, Ostrikov, Neild, Lund (capt), Ioane.

Replacements: Briggs, Lewis-Roberts, Mujati, Mills, Seymour, Mitchell, Ford, Jennings.

Montpellier: Mogg; Nagusa, Tuitavake, Steyn, Fall; Lucas, Paillaugue; Nariashvili, B du Plessis, J du Plessis, Willemse, Privat, Ouedraogo (capt), Liebenbery, Qera.

Replacements: Watremez, Kubriashvili, Watchou, Galletier, Wright, Ebersohn, Floch.

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 1:25 pm
by Guwuffle
TV coverage is on Sky Sports 3 for those like me that weren't sure where to watch.

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 9:29 pm
by 16th man
Sale being out muscled, and lacking real quality.

Lacey's reffing of the breakdown is awful though. His definition of coming through the middle has been ridiculously loose for the French.

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 12:10 am
by Epaminondas Pules
16th man wrote:Sale being out muscled, and lacking real quality.

Lacey's reffing of the breakdown is awful though. His definition of coming through the middle has been ridiculously loose for the French.
Lacey is the King of Clown Referees, a true leader of Irish refereeing. How the man makes a living from being utterly terrible at his job is beyond me.

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:28 am
by Beasties
Epaminondas Pules wrote:
16th man wrote:Sale being out muscled, and lacking real quality.

Lacey's reffing of the breakdown is awful though. His definition of coming through the middle has been ridiculously loose for the French.
Lacey is the King of Clown Referees, a true leader of Irish refereeing. How the man makes a living from being utterly terrible at his job is beyond me.
This.

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:59 am
by fivepointer
Lacey gave his usual low level performance. Montpelier got away with all sorts at the breakdown without punishment.

They were the better side though and will take some beating in this competition.

Sale really lost it in the 3rd quarter, when they had possession and territory but couldnt score any points. James try, nicely teed up by Cipriani who was good throughout, was a highlight. Impressed again by the workrate of young Neild.

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:41 am
by PPJ
Agree out muscled and lacked quality but Cips is playing really well and is better than the current England 10.

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 9:51 am
by Oakboy
PPJ wrote:Agree out muscled and lacked quality but Cips is playing really well and is better than the current England 10.
Agreed. His hands are better than any other English 10.

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 1:02 pm
by Mikey Brown
Oakboy wrote:
PPJ wrote:Agree out muscled and lacked quality but Cips is playing really well and is better than the current England 10.
Agreed. His hands are better than any other English 10.
Really? He's got something above Ford, Burns, Slade?

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:26 am
by Oakboy
Mikey Brown wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
PPJ wrote:Agree out muscled and lacked quality but Cips is playing really well and is better than the current England 10.
Agreed. His hands are better than any other English 10.
Really? He's got something above Ford, Burns, Slade?
I think so, yes. There is a greater creative element in his attacking prowess aided by the fastest hands. If he starts a lot of games for Wasps next season I think he'll move further ahead too.

Looking ahead I can see a case for picking Farrell ahead of him (not that I ever would) in terms of physicality and grind. Should Slade get Exeter's 10 shirt regularly, his game could produce the best balance of physicality and skill, IMO. I've always rated Ford ahead of Burns but until either Bath get their game in gear or he moves away from Dad, I can't see Ford making the expected progress. Some did not think that Ford played too badly in the 6N and he can't have done really as the FH in a GS-winning team. There is something missing though in terms of front-foot game management even allowing for playing with Youngs/Care.