Page 1 of 2
Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:51 pm
by Epaminondas Pules
STARTING XV
15 Freddie Burns [82]
14 Guy Porter [22]
13 Matt Scott [30]
12 Dan Kelly [25]
11 Nemani Nadolo [22]
10 George Ford (c) [112]
9 Jack van Poortvliet [26]
1 Francois van Wyk [4]
2 Nic Dolly [8]
3 Dan Cole [271]
4 Harry Wells [131]
5 Calum Green [66]
6 Ollie Chessum [13]
7 Tommy Reffell [53]
8 Cyle Brink [17] *
REPLACEMENTS
16 Tom Cowan-Dickie [3]
17 Nephi Leatigaga [48]
18 Joe Heyes [77]
19 Eli Snyman [5]
20 George Martin [22]
21 Richard Wigglesworth [19]
22 Bryce Hegarty [1]
23 Kini Murimurivalu [25]
* denotes first appearance of the 2021/22 season
Bath Rugby: 15 Orlando Bailey, 14 Semesa Rokoduguni, 13 Jonathan Joseph, 12 Max Clark, 11 Will Muir, 10 Danny Cipriani, 9 Ollie Fox; 1 Juan Schoeman, 2 Tom Dunn, 3 D’Arcy Rae, 4 Josh McNally (c), 5 Ewan Richards, 6 Tom Ellis, 7 Richard de Carpentier, 8 Miles Reid
Replacements: 16 Jacques du Toit, 17 Arthur Cordwell, 18 Kieran Verden, 19 Nahum Merigan, 20 Tom Cowan, 21 Max Green, 22 Max Ojomoh, 23 Ruaridh McConnochie
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 1:06 pm
by Puja
I am nervous about being cocky, especially given our recent history. However, that is a very handy Leicester side, even with the international callups. And injuries and callups have left that Bath side looking vulnerable, even without the consideration that they're in a miserable run of form.
It's a Friday night match in November, so it could very easily end up being a muddy mess, but to me this looks like a chance to pay Bath back for the consecutive dickings that they handed out to us a few seasons back.
Puja
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 1:37 pm
by FKAS
Agreed. On paper this should be a humbling experience for Bath. However, how often have we seen a much reduced team buoyed with youthful exuberance and players desperate to make a point. Bath's team will be able to play without pressure, with a reckless abandon if it suits them. Tigers will have a huge weight of expectancy.
That being said you'd still hope Tigers can wrap this up early and then get the likes of Ford and Nadolo off and away from possible injury. Give some game time to squad players.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 2:34 pm
by fivepointer
Be a major surprise if Tigers dont win with quite a bit to spare.
The Bath starting XV looks OK but that is a very green bench.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 2:43 pm
by Which Tyler
Please bring vaseline
fivepointer wrote:The Bath starting XV looks OK but that is a very green bench.
Only if you consider the tight 5 to be unimportant in rugby...
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 2:54 pm
by Peej
What's up with Liebenberg?
It's not a bad backline from Bath, but there's a fair old gulf between the packs.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:30 pm
by Puja
Peej wrote:What's up with Liebenberg?
It's not a bad backline from Bath, but there's a fair old gulf between the packs.
Injured in the win against Sale - did something to his shoulder when reaching out to score a try.
Puja
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:42 pm
by Peej
Ta.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 6:03 pm
by Which Tyler
As I was doing this earlier in the season...
1. Schoemann - 3rd choice
2. Dunn - 1st choice
3. Rae - 3rd choice
4. McNally - 1st choice
5. Richards - 5th choice (albeit to cover 2 positions, so call it 4th)
6. Ellis - 2nd choice
7. De Carpentier - 3rd choise
8. Reid - 4th/5th choice (at 8)
09. Fox - 3rd choice (from before the season started)
10. Cipriani - 1st choice
11. Muir - 1st choice
12. Clarke - 3rd choice (at IC)
13. Joseph - 1st choice
14. Rokoduguni - 5th choice
15. Bailey - 4th/5th choice (at FB)
So overall, a 2.7th choice XV
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 8:18 pm
by Puja
Which Tyler wrote:14. Rokoduguni - 5th choice
Really?! That seems harsh. Cokanasiga, Watson (and, at the risk of ruining a running joke, are you double-counting him as one of the full-back options missing), McConnochie, and Muir? I'm assuming you're talking about across both wings, as I can't imagine you have 8 wings better than him, so it's probably fairer to say that he's third choice for one wing.
I'm astounded that de Carpentier is as high as your third choice at 7, but that's more a critique of Bath's squad building than saying you've got it wrong.
You have had rotten luck with injuries though. My sympathies do go out to you.
Puja
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 8:40 pm
by Scrumhead
Hard to see past a very comfortable Tigers win here. I’d fancy Dolly to pick up another try on two.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 9:27 pm
by Which Tyler
Yes, counting Roko across both wings (and hadn't realised, like I had for Richards).
Muir, McConnochie, Cokanasinga and Hamer-Webb all start ahead of him when fit.
These days, he's just counting down time on his contract having lost a couple of yards of pace. I don't recall seeing him sprint since the league restarted in August 2020.
As for DeCarpentier, I'm counting him as 5th of our 5 senior flankers - your right though in that he'd probably be lower as an OSF.
Just call me Mr Internally Inconsistent
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 10:31 am
by Puja
Just realised we've had Matt Scott back from Scotland. Add him to Ford and Nadolo (and Ewels to look at the opposition) and we're doing quite well out of unexpected bonuses from bizarre international selections.
Puja
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 12:42 pm
by Mikey Brown
Puja wrote:Just realised we've had Matt Scott back from Scotland. Add him to Ford and Nadolo (and Ewels to look at the opposition) and we're doing quite well out of unexpected bonuses from bizarre international selections.
Puja
Nice to see him finally find his groove a bit with Leicester. Unfortunately a pairing with B&I Lions legend Chris Harris wouldn't give Scotland the deftest of handling skills in midfield but I'd love to see him get another cap at some point.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 4:16 pm
by twitchy
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 7:58 pm
by FKAS
Baths defence looks pretty poor but in attack they look dangerous. This could be more interesting than anticipated.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:04 pm
by Raggs
Cips doing Cips things, both good and bad.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:13 pm
by FKAS
Raggs wrote:Cips doing Cips things, both good and bad.
Yeah you can't say you don't know what you're going to get with Cipriani.
Tigers are maybe playing a bit too much. Yes the Bath defence is bad but I think we need to tenderise it with some big carriers a bit first. Unless this is a Borthers ploy to try and tire the Bath pack by forcing them to run.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:16 pm
by Raggs
Jesus... In about 6 months I'd be annoyed at one of my u10s for doing that, for a prem backrower not to understand you can just reach over and grab the ball in a ruck...
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:20 pm
by FKAS
Raggs wrote:Jesus... In about 6 months I'd be annoyed at one of my u10s for doing that, for a prem backrower not to understand you can just reach over and grab the ball in a ruck...
I have no idea what he's thinking. I think he then gave Tigers the advantage at the next rolling maul. Bath captain probably just needs to have a word in his ear to calm down.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:23 pm
by Which Tyler
I can tell you what he's thinking "We're f***ing desperate, but somehow still in this - oh look, a bally"
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:28 pm
by FKAS
Tigers indiscipline is criminal. Borthwick is going to be fuming at half time. Inexcusable penalties being conceded.
That and the inability to take a frigging high ball. Steward's agent will be highlighting this in any contract negotiations.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:39 pm
by Scrumhead
Quite impressed by Fox tonight. JvP has been poor in comparison.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 9:00 pm
by FKAS
Scrumhead wrote:Quite impressed by Fox tonight. JvP has been poor in comparison.
JVP has shown his inexperience. I really had him as one who was going to enjoy tonight as well.
Re: Tigers v Bath
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 9:17 pm
by Puja
FKAS wrote:Scrumhead wrote:Quite impressed by Fox tonight. JvP has been poor in comparison.
JVP has shown his inexperience. I really had him as one who was going to enjoy tonight as well.
Same. He is still very young and has a lot of rough edges that will only get filed off with experience. I was definitely wrong to complain about our retention of Wigglesworth as a player at the start of the season; he's been utterly necessary.
Such a frustrating match - so many completely futile penalties from both sides. Can't tell who's better when each side are determined to give the other gifts.
Puja