Exe vs Glasgow - Sat - 5.30 pm
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2022 1:11 pm
Great to hear. Two players I really admire, and pleased for Sladefivepointer wrote:
Nowell was excellent, so too LCD and Slade.
Outside back looking better when side are playing well shockOakboy wrote:Slade's hands in quick-fired creativity were sublime. He is now becoming more authoritative too. I hope Jones picks him with Marchant as a centre pairing. They would thrive with Smith at FH - given a decent run of games.
Even I, in everlasting learning mode, appreciate that.Banquo wrote:Outside back looking better when side are playing well shockOakboy wrote:Slade's hands in quick-fired creativity were sublime. He is now becoming more authoritative too. I hope Jones picks him with Marchant as a centre pairing. They would thrive with Smith at FH - given a decent run of games.
Oh yes, I'm just remarking that you are continually demanding backs 'stamp authority' on a game, when often that's a tad difficult as an outside back in a team performing poorly.Oakboy wrote:Even I, in everlasting learning mode, appreciate that.Banquo wrote:Outside back looking better when side are playing well shockOakboy wrote:Slade's hands in quick-fired creativity were sublime. He is now becoming more authoritative too. I hope Jones picks him with Marchant as a centre pairing. They would thrive with Smith at FH - given a decent run of games.The simple belief that Slade has better hands than Farrell keeps my fingers crossed for that trio. Unfortunately, as we all fear, Jones will probably pick Farrell at 12.
Ah, when I used the word 'authoritative' about Slade here I was thinking more of demanding support from team-mates. Before we drift down a cross-purposes cul-de-sac (largely of my making because your in-depth knowledge of the game is so vastly superior), where Slade is developing, IMO, is in being a central part of taking chances. I understand that forwards create the space for openings etc. but once a chance develops being ruthless in execution must be the goal for the backs, mustn't it? I use 'authoritative' in that context, perhaps wrongly.Banquo wrote:Oh yes, I'm just remarking that you are continually demanding backs 'stamp authority' on a game, when often that's a tad difficult as an outside back in a team performing poorly.Oakboy wrote:Even I, in everlasting learning mode, appreciate that.Banquo wrote: Outside back looking better when side are playing well shockThe simple belief that Slade has better hands than Farrell keeps my fingers crossed for that trio. Unfortunately, as we all fear, Jones will probably pick Farrell at 12.
The only point I’m making is that you need to have the opportunity to show your mettle, and in the outside backs it’s a bit out of one’s control. So maybe a bit agreeing and it cross terminology purposeOakboy wrote:Ah, when I used the word 'authoritative' about Slade here I was thinking more of demanding support from team-mates. Before we drift down a cross-purposes cul-de-sac (largely of my making because your in-depth knowledge of the game is so vastly superior), where Slade is developing, IMO, is in being a central part of taking chances. I understand that forwards create the space for openings etc. but once a chance develops being ruthless in execution must be the goal for the backs, mustn't it? I use 'authoritative' in that context, perhaps wrongly.Banquo wrote:Oh yes, I'm just remarking that you are continually demanding backs 'stamp authority' on a game, when often that's a tad difficult as an outside back in a team performing poorly.Oakboy wrote:
Even I, in everlasting learning mode, appreciate that.The simple belief that Slade has better hands than Farrell keeps my fingers crossed for that trio. Unfortunately, as we all fear, Jones will probably pick Farrell at 12.