Sarries Vs Tigers
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 8524
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Sarries Vs Tigers
First Vs second and both opt to rotate for this one.
SARACENS XV: 15 Elliot Daly, 14 Sean Maitland, 13 Alex Lozowski, 12 Nick Tompkins, 11 Alex Lewington, 10 Alex Goode, 9 Aled Davies; 1 Mako Vunipola (c), 2 Tom Woolstencroft, 3 Vincent Koch, 4 Callum Hunter-Hill, 5 Tim Swinson, 6 Andy Christie, 7 Jackson Wray, 8 Billy Vunipola
Replacements: 16 Ethan Lewis, 17 Richard Barrington, 18 Sam Wainwright, 19 Theo McFarland, 20 Ben Earl, 21 Ruben de Haas, 22 Duncan Taylor, 23 Rotimi Segun
STARTING XV
15 Freddie Burns [91]
14 Harry Potter [31]
13 Matías Moroni [24]
12 Matt Scott [41]
11 Kini Murimurivalu [32]
10 George Ford (c) [118]
9 Jack van Poortvliet (vc) [39]
1 James Whitcombe [16]
2 Nic Dolly [17]
3 Joe Heyes [90]
4 Eli Snyman [13]
5 Calum Green [80]
6 Ollie Chessum [22]
7 Tommy Reffell [67]
8 George Martin [33]
REPLACEMENTS
16 Charlie Clare [42]
17 Francois van Wyk [11]
18 Nephi Leatigaga [59]
19 Harry Wells [145]
20 Jasper Wiese [33]
21 Richard Wigglesworth [29]
22 Guy Porter [35]
23 Nemani Nadolo [28]
SARACENS XV: 15 Elliot Daly, 14 Sean Maitland, 13 Alex Lozowski, 12 Nick Tompkins, 11 Alex Lewington, 10 Alex Goode, 9 Aled Davies; 1 Mako Vunipola (c), 2 Tom Woolstencroft, 3 Vincent Koch, 4 Callum Hunter-Hill, 5 Tim Swinson, 6 Andy Christie, 7 Jackson Wray, 8 Billy Vunipola
Replacements: 16 Ethan Lewis, 17 Richard Barrington, 18 Sam Wainwright, 19 Theo McFarland, 20 Ben Earl, 21 Ruben de Haas, 22 Duncan Taylor, 23 Rotimi Segun
STARTING XV
15 Freddie Burns [91]
14 Harry Potter [31]
13 Matías Moroni [24]
12 Matt Scott [41]
11 Kini Murimurivalu [32]
10 George Ford (c) [118]
9 Jack van Poortvliet (vc) [39]
1 James Whitcombe [16]
2 Nic Dolly [17]
3 Joe Heyes [90]
4 Eli Snyman [13]
5 Calum Green [80]
6 Ollie Chessum [22]
7 Tommy Reffell [67]
8 George Martin [33]
REPLACEMENTS
16 Charlie Clare [42]
17 Francois van Wyk [11]
18 Nephi Leatigaga [59]
19 Harry Wells [145]
20 Jasper Wiese [33]
21 Richard Wigglesworth [29]
22 Guy Porter [35]
23 Nemani Nadolo [28]
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
Good test for guess who……. JVP! Martin at 8 interesting.FKAS wrote:First Vs second and both opt to rotate for this one.
SARACENS XV: 15 Elliot Daly, 14 Sean Maitland, 13 Alex Lozowski, 12 Nick Tompkins, 11 Alex Lewington, 10 Alex Goode, 9 Aled Davies; 1 Mako Vunipola (c), 2 Tom Woolstencroft, 3 Vincent Koch, 4 Callum Hunter-Hill, 5 Tim Swinson, 6 Andy Christie, 7 Jackson Wray, 8 Billy Vunipola
Replacements: 16 Ethan Lewis, 17 Richard Barrington, 18 Sam Wainwright, 19 Theo McFarland, 20 Ben Earl, 21 Ruben de Haas, 22 Duncan Taylor, 23 Rotimi Segun
STARTING XV
15 Freddie Burns [91]
14 Harry Potter [31]
13 Matías Moroni [24]
12 Matt Scott [41]
11 Kini Murimurivalu [32]
10 George Ford (c) [118]
9 Jack van Poortvliet (vc) [39]
1 James Whitcombe [16]
2 Nic Dolly [17]
3 Joe Heyes [90]
4 Eli Snyman [13]
5 Calum Green [80]
6 Ollie Chessum [22]
7 Tommy Reffell [67]
8 George Martin [33]
REPLACEMENTS
16 Charlie Clare [42]
17 Francois van Wyk [11]
18 Nephi Leatigaga [59]
19 Harry Wells [145]
20 Jasper Wiese [33]
21 Richard Wigglesworth [29]
22 Guy Porter [35]
23 Nemani Nadolo [28]
Sarries will be way better w Goode at 10 imo. What’s happened to Earl’s form?
- Puja
- Posts: 17793
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
I'm assuming Cole's injured and it's under Borthwick's usual blackout, cause we could really have used him for this. Good test for Heyes though. Certainly won't lack for power coming through behind him though.
Odd that we're rotating so hard. Scott/Moroni are hardly schlubs in the centre and Kini is hardly bad, but you'd've thought we'd want to go up against Sarries with 5 more of our first team in Kelly, Porter, Nadolo, Wells, and Wiese (and that's assuming Liebenberg isn't rested by choice and is unavailable, gods how I hate this injury news blackout policy). Still, we've had harder rotations with positive results before, so IBWT once more.
Puja
ETA. And Montoya as well, jfc.
Odd that we're rotating so hard. Scott/Moroni are hardly schlubs in the centre and Kini is hardly bad, but you'd've thought we'd want to go up against Sarries with 5 more of our first team in Kelly, Porter, Nadolo, Wells, and Wiese (and that's assuming Liebenberg isn't rested by choice and is unavailable, gods how I hate this injury news blackout policy). Still, we've had harder rotations with positive results before, so IBWT once more.
Puja
ETA. And Montoya as well, jfc.
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 5924
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
Schlubs.....???
Tigers have Ford back, which is a big bonus. Quite a test for the starting props. Tigers bench looks the stronger which may be significant.
Bound to be a close, cagey and physical kind of game i imagine.
Tigers have Ford back, which is a big bonus. Quite a test for the starting props. Tigers bench looks the stronger which may be significant.
Bound to be a close, cagey and physical kind of game i imagine.
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
Sarries appear to have rotated players in rather than out. That's not radically far off the strongest team available for them. Bit of a weird point to decided to rotate so many players from a Tigers perspective. Not doing Ford any favours, that's for sure.
-
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 am
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
Not really that weird.
Away game
Not desperate for points
Plastic Pitch
Away game
Not desperate for points
Plastic Pitch
-
- Posts: 8524
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
Borthwick loves to rotate the squad. He doesn't rotate for the hell of it either there will be a tactic behind the players picked both starting and on the bench. It's been one of the many things about his tenure so far that has really impressed me. Currently we have at least two players for every position I'd be entirely happy with us fielding. Been a long time since that was the case.
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
Clearly his godsonFKAS wrote:Borthwick loves to rotate the squad. He doesn't rotate for the hell of it either there will be a tactic behind the players picked both starting and on the bench. It's been one of the many things about his tenure so far that has really impressed me. Currently we have at least two players for every position I'd be entirely happy with us fielding. Been a long time since that was the case.

-
- Posts: 6001
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
Yeah. Apart from Earl starting ahead of Christie, that’s about the best they can muster right now I reckon.Peej wrote:Sarries appear to have rotated players in rather than out. That's not radically far off the strongest team available for them. Bit of a weird point to decided to rotate so many players from a Tigers perspective. Not doing Ford any favours, that's for sure.
-
- Posts: 8524
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
Ha not quite. My godfather is at least twenty years Borthwick's senior for starters.Banquo wrote:Clearly his godsonFKAS wrote:Borthwick loves to rotate the squad. He doesn't rotate for the hell of it either there will be a tactic behind the players picked both starting and on the bench. It's been one of the many things about his tenure so far that has really impressed me. Currently we have at least two players for every position I'd be entirely happy with us fielding. Been a long time since that was the case.
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
great start from Tigers. Sarries ropy.
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
daly excellent in attack so far- good incursions and pass timing. V poor by Muri - 10 pt try
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
lol @danny care re Jones
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
penalty counts chunky. Tompkins looks a new man at 12
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
Should have started with Wiggy.
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
Wiggy will have the windp/d wrote:Should have started with Wiggy.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14578
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
HIA for Billy?!?!?
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
lol really doesnt know the lawsMellsblue wrote:HIA for Billy?!?!?
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
sarries pen count is ludicrous
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
Billy terrible hands today
-
- Posts: 8524
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
That's a red card all day. Awful technique head to head first collision. CMK is bailing Sarries out time after time with their discipline. Tigers need him to wake up as we don't have enough attacking penetration currently.
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
green gets away with a bad one imo.FKAS wrote:That's a red card all day. Awful technique head to head first collision. CMK is bailing Sarries out time after time with their discipline. Tigers need him to wake up as we don't have enough attacking penetration currently.
Last edited by Banquo on Sat Mar 05, 2022 4:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 8524
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
That's no more of a neck roll than the one the TMO and ref didn't bother with against Nadolo five mins earlier.
-
- Posts: 8524
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Sarries Vs Tigers
And yes it was a bad one but Nadolo got dragged through a ruck by his head. Consistency would be nice. TMO was trying for a yellow there having not bothered to mentioned the one on Nadolo.