Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9136
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Which Tyler »

Ref: Anthony Woodthorpe
TJs: Daniel Jones & Calum Howard
TMO: Stuart Terheege

Northampton:
1 Tom West
2 Curtis Langdon
3 Trevor Davison
4 Temo Mayanavanua
5 Alex Coles
6 Josh Kemeny
7 Tom Pearson
8 Juarno Augustus

09 Alex Mitchell
10 Fin Smith
11 James Ramm
12 Rory Hutchinson
13 Fraser Dingwall
14 Tommy Freeman
15 George Hendy

16 Henry Walker, 17 Tarek Haffar, 18 Luke Green, 19 Tom Lockett, 20 Henry Pollock, 21 Angus Scott-Young
22 Archie McParland, 23 Ollie Sleightholme


Bath:
1 Beno Obano
2 Tom Dunn
3 Will Stuart
4 Quinn Roux
5 Ross Molony
6 Guy Pepper
7 Miles Reid
8 Alfie Barbeary

09 Ben Spencer
10 Finn Russell
11 Will Muir
12 Max Ojomoh
13 Ollie Lawrence
14 Joe Cokanasiga
15 Orlando Bailey

16 Kepu Tuipulotu, 17 Francois van Wyk, 18 Thomas du Toit, 19 Charlie Ewels, 20 Sam Underhill, 22 Josh Bayliss, 23 Jaco Coetzee
21 Louis Schreuder
Beasties
Posts: 1307
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Beasties »

7/1 bench?
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9136
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Which Tyler »

Beasties wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 1:11 pm7/1 bench?
I know :(
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12117
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Mikey Brown »

Are they struggling for fit backs? Is Bayliss maybe actually the wing cover?
FKAS
Posts: 8361
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by FKAS »

Mikey Brown wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 1:18 pm Are they struggling for fit backs? Is Bayliss maybe actually the wing cover?
He's probably quicker than Louis Schreuder. Not the game to have a lack of fit backs though. Will Vesty tweak his attacking tactics? Maybe try and get the Bath backline running a lot in the first half knowing they've all got to play the full 80 mins and Saints have the back division to make tired tackles costly.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9136
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Which Tyler »

Mikey Brown wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 1:18 pm Are they struggling for fit backs? Is Bayliss maybe actually the wing cover?
Nope, deliberate choice by JvG :(
FKAS
Posts: 8361
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by FKAS »

Which Tyler wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 1:33 pm
Mikey Brown wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 1:18 pm Are they struggling for fit backs? Is Bayliss maybe actually the wing cover?
Nope, deliberate choice by JvG :(
:lol:

Got to love those crazy South African head coaches.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9136
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Which Tyler »

FKAS wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 1:38 pmGot to love those crazy South African head coaches.
It's the Bath Bomb squad - sponsored by Lush
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1563
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by jngf »

Is Guy Pepper better at 6 or 7 btw?
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9136
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Which Tyler »

jngf wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 2:54 pm Is Guy Pepper better at 6 or 7 btw?
In my eyes, he's a 7; but I don't think it really matters these days, it's about the backrow as a whole covering all the things you want from a backrow.
Choice between 6 and 7 seems to be "who do I want pressuring their 10" rather than anything to do with tackling, linking, carrying etc.

Pepper at 6 certainly isn't the problem with this selection.
Banquo
Posts: 19093
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Banquo »

where's the popcorn ?
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3390
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Another school leaver in line for Prem debut!
Scrumhead
Posts: 5975
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Scrumhead »

Which Tyler wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 2:56 pm
jngf wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 2:54 pm Is Guy Pepper better at 6 or 7 btw?
In my eyes, he's a 7; but I don't think it really matters these days, it's about the backrow as a whole covering all the things you want from a backrow.
Choice between 6 and 7 seems to be "who do I want pressuring their 10" rather than anything to do with tackling, linking, carrying etc.

Pepper at 6 certainly isn't the problem with this selection.
Same. Feels a bit more like an SA numbering convention though with Reid the more natural 6 and Pepper the natural 7 just with the numbers swapped.

7:1 is very high risk but a big sign of confidence from Bath and as @Mikey Brown mentioned, Bayliss has the gas/dexterity to play a version of the Kwagga Smith role.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1692
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Adam_P »

Sleightholme replaced on the bench by Seabrook
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1692
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Adam_P »

Lovely stuff from Fin Smith and Mitchell for the 2nd try
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1692
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Adam_P »

Well this isn't going how I thought it would, 3 tries for Saints in 13 mins
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9136
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Which Tyler »

3 back rowers on the bench, one of whom is expecting to spend some time on the wing.
A starting backrower picks up an injury in the opening 10 minutes.
Replace him with your wing cover

Genius
Captainhaircut
Posts: 303
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:32 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Captainhaircut »

Which Tyler wrote: Sun Jan 05, 2025 3:18 pm 3 back rowers on the bench, one of whom is expecting to spend some time on the wing.
A starting backrower picks up an injury in the opening 10 minutes.
Replace him with your wing cover

Genius
Think they wanted the lineout option.
twitchy
Posts: 3279
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by twitchy »

Fantastic game.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1692
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Adam_P »

Yeah I was expecting Underhill on for Pepper
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9136
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Which Tyler »

A] Saints racking up the defensive penalties.
B] how the hell did Bailey get through there?
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9136
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Which Tyler »

Captainhaircut wrote: Sun Jan 05, 2025 3:27 pm Think they wanted the lineout option.
I think it's just "we've game planned this to not use and backfield replacements, and well play it out as if we won't use any backfield replacements"

Bayliss for Pepper is fine.
It's doing that early, with a 7:1 bench that is too risky (mins, the 7:1 is too risky regardless)
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1692
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Adam_P »

And now Muir is injured...
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1692
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Adam_P »

Fin Smith absolutely melting Reid, embarrassing for the flanker
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9136
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00

Post by Which Tyler »

And the insanity is confirmed
Post Reply