Bernie won in California.

[UGagain]

SMOKING GUN! APPROXIMATELY 15% OF BERNIE’S VOTES WERE FLIPPED TO CLINTON IN CALIFORNIA

24
JUN
Richard Charnin
June 24, 2016
Updated: June 27

Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
LINKS TO POSTS
Democratic Primaries spread sheet
From TDMS Research: Democratic 2016 primaries

SMOKING GUN! APPROXIMATELY 15% OF BERNIE’S VOTES WERE FLIPPED TO CLINTON IN CALIFORNIA

In California on Election Day, Clinton led Sanders 56.8-43.2% in Total Votes Cast. Sanders leads in Updates since Election Day by 51.1-48.9% . The updates include mail-ins, crossover ballots, provisional ballots and others. Technically, these votes are probably not all hand-counted, although we have been told that they have been individually verified.

It appears that nearly 15% of Sanders’ votes were flipped to Clinton on maliciously-coded voting machines and central tabulators.

Sanders hand-counted share exceeded his machine-counted share in virtually ALL 58 counties. The probability of this occurrence is ZERO. View the CA Update spreadsheet.





Sander’s Vote share change from Election Day

California Election Day June 7 Sanders 43.63% June 8 – June 25 Sanders 51.11% Change +7.48%
ALAMEDA 39.1% 61.1% 22.0%
ALPINE 67.4% 72.7% 5.3%
AMADOR 42.5% 52.8% 10.3%
BUTTE 53.5% 72.4% 18.9%
CALAVERAS 44.9% 60.5% 15.6%
COLUSA 41.6% 55.4% 13.8%
CONTRA COSTA 32.6% 47.1% 14.5%
DEL NORTE 52.7% 72.6% 19.9%
EL DORADO 44.3% 56.6% 12.3%
FRESNO 32.1% 50.9% 18.8%
GLENN 48.0% 57.8% 9.8%
HUMBOLDT 61.2% n/a n/a
IMPERIAL 24.7% 34.6% 9.9%
INYO 50.4% 59.2% 8.8%
KERN 35.1% 47.6% 12.5%
KINGS 34.6% 58.4% 23.8%
LAKE 44.7% n/a n/a
LASSEN 51.4% 67.5% 16.1%
LOS ANGELES 33.4% 49.9% 16.5%
MADERA 39.6% 55.7% 16.1%
MARIN 36.6% 43.8% 7.2%
MARIPOSA 48.9% 68.7% 19.8%
MENDOCINO 58.8% n/a n/a
MERCED 36.4% 49.4% 13.0%
MODOC 53.7% n/a n/a
MONO 81.5% 69.7% -11.8%
MONTEREY 36.3% 49.9% 13.6%
NAPA 37.8% 51.8% 14.0%
NEVADA 55.7% 64.3% 8.6%
ORANGE 36.4% 53.6% 17.2%
PLACER 36.5% n/a n/a
PLUMAS 55.0% n/a n/a
RIVERSIDE 32.5% 47.0% 14.5%
SACRAMENTO 35.5% 46.1% 10.6%
SAN BENARDINO 34.3% 48.9% 14.6%
SAN BENITO 36.8% 47.0% 10.2%
SAN DIEGO 35.8% 51.4% 15.6%
SAN FRANCISCO 37.6% 50.9% 13.3%
SAN JOAQUIN 34.4% 45.6% 11.2%
SAN LUIS OBISPO 43.9% 62.3% 18.4%
SAN MATEO 30.9% 42.2% 11.3%
SANTA BARBARA 40.6% 56.1% 15.5%
SANTA CLARA 34.3% 48.0% 13.7%
SANTA CRUZ 47.9% 62.4% 14.5%
SHASTA 45.8% 59.9% 14.1%
SIERRA 59.3% 66.7% 7.4%
SISKIYOU 53.5% 64.4% 10.9%
SOLANO 36.8% 56.2% 19.4%
SONOMA 44.3% n/a n/a
STANISLAUS 37.1% 48.8% 11.7%
SUTTER 40.1% 50.3% 10.2%
TEHAMA 44.8% 55.7% 10.9%
TRINITY 59.8% 74.8% 15.0%
TULARE 37.6% 48.2% 10.6%
TUOLUMNE 46.0% 62.5% 16.5%
VENTURA 40.1% 54.6% 14.5%
YOLO 40.3% 58.7% 18.4%
YUBA 44.4% 56.1% 11.7%


Posted 6/25/2016 on Facebook by Phillip Wyler Evans:

Votes counted on Election Day
Clinton led Sanders by 56.37-43.63% (1,940,580-1,502,043 votes)

Votes counted since Election Day:
Sanders led Clinton by 51.11 – 48.89% (711,554-680,724 votes)


————————————————————————-

Poll workers claim that 50% to 90% of voters who were supposed to have been eligible to vote in the Democratic primary were told they would have to vote using provisional ballots. There were two reasons for this:

1-previously registered voters’ names had been removed from the rolls.

2- Some were marked as vote by mail voters – but they had received no ballot in the mail. Virtually all who were not allowed to vote and forced to vote provisional ballots were Bernie Sanders supporters.

Poll workers in Los Angeles and Orange County report that Bernie won the electronic votes in their precincts by well over a 2 to 1 margin, the opposite of the vote count. The contrast indicates vote-flipping.

If you add the lower figure of 50% of voters who were not allowed to vote regular ballots for Bernie to the votes he received, you wind up with a substantial Sanders landslide victory in California. The primary beneficiary of the fraud is Hillary Clinton.