http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36693122
Still, if City are happy to pay that, then Everton would be mad not to sell. Great prospect that he is, he is far from the finished article.
£50m for Stones
- Numbers
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am
Re: £50m for Stones
Yeah, it appears that centrebacks are required to play the ball out of defence these days, I always thouhght defending was the most important part, the amount of times Stones gave the ball away last season was incredible.WaspInWales wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36693122
Still, if City are happy to pay that, then Everton would be mad not to sell. Great prospect that he is, he is far from the finished article.
-
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:47 pm
Re: £50m for Stones
You would think City would learn from Sterling that maybe its worth waiting a season or two for these players to settle down a bit, but in fairness to them they have the cash and probably most importantly, they need the English players. If Stones was Spanish, you'd pick him up for about £7m.
- Numbers
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am
Re: £50m for Stones
If I were an England fan I would be quite annoyed that one of our your most promising youngsters could be going to warm the bench at City - the scourge of English defensive talent over the last decade (Lescott, RIchards).
- Stom
- Posts: 5830
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: £50m for Stones
No-one played well for Everton last season. So is it the defender or the system?Numbers wrote:Yeah, it appears that centrebacks are required to play the ball out of defence these days, I always thouhght defending was the most important part, the amount of times Stones gave the ball away last season was incredible.WaspInWales wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36693122
Still, if City are happy to pay that, then Everton would be mad not to sell. Great prospect that he is, he is far from the finished article.
I'd go for the latter.
- Numbers
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am
Re: £50m for Stones
The system doesn't require you to pass the ball to the opposition, which he did, on innumerable occasions last season, as an Everton fan I watched quite a few of the games.Stom wrote:No-one played well for Everton last season. So is it the defender or the system?Numbers wrote:Yeah, it appears that centrebacks are required to play the ball out of defence these days, I always thouhght defending was the most important part, the amount of times Stones gave the ball away last season was incredible.WaspInWales wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36693122
Still, if City are happy to pay that, then Everton would be mad not to sell. Great prospect that he is, he is far from the finished article.
I'd go for the latter.
You could blame Martinez for his insistence for playing the ball out from the back but that seems to be the main plus people are always lauding about Stones.
-
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: £50m for Stones
I wonder if Stones may be better off in the kind of role that Dier played for England recently?
He does have great feet for a defender so would be good going forward and it may relieve a little pressure on him being the last line of defence which is where he makes most of his errors.
He does have great feet for a defender so would be good going forward and it may relieve a little pressure on him being the last line of defence which is where he makes most of his errors.
- Numbers
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am
Re: £50m for Stones
Ideal I would say.WaspInWales wrote:I wonder if Stones may be better off in the kind of role that Dier played for England recently?
He does have great feet for a defender so would be good going forward and it may relieve a little pressure on him being the last line of defence which is where he makes most of his errors.
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2016 7:55 pm
Re: £50m for Stones
Numbers wrote:If I were an England fan I would be quite annoyed that one of our your most promising youngsters could be going to warm the bench at City - the scourge of English defensive talent over the last decade (Lescott, RIchards).
No expert on footie but Lescott has to be one of the least talented players despite huge sums paid for him by clubs . At Villa last season he looked as tho' he'd have trouble trapping a medicine ball .
- Stom
- Posts: 5830
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: £50m for Stones
He was one of those quick, strong players bought by a big team because they thought they could mould him into something. Then it turned out they couldn't, so he rotted on the bench for years and became worse. Then he lost his pace and suddenly he's a pretty crappy player.Discreet Hooker wrote:Numbers wrote:If I were an England fan I would be quite annoyed that one of our your most promising youngsters could be going to warm the bench at City - the scourge of English defensive talent over the last decade (Lescott, RIchards).
No expert on footie but Lescott has to be one of the least talented players despite huge sums paid for him by clubs . At Villa last season he looked as tho' he'd have trouble trapping a medicine ball .
City shouldn't have that problem again, although Mangala...
Talk is it isn't Stones the 50mil is marked for, it's Bonucci. Which is interesting. 50mil for a 29 year old CB isn't really much of an investment for the future :p