Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:50 pm
Come on Pollard put us out of our misery!
Page 15 of 23
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:50 pm
Yeah, that was harsh.
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:51 pm
Has Borthwick finally got the message? I fear not 
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:53 pm
I'm so sorryStom wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:27 pmIt’s Jones’ bloody master plan, isn’t it… one plan to beat SA. Now Slarti Bartfarst can use it.switchskier wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:26 pm I think that England are going to do this. They're hitting harder than SA and look like they know what they are doing.
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:54 pm
He's still going 
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:54 pm
Fucking Billy
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:55 pm
Referee refuses to ref the final few minutes. Showing why an average ref shouldn't be given a semi final.
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:55 pm
billy v....tsk tsk
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:56 pm
No tries for SA. Better than we expected. Pushed them to the limit. A different (better) ref and maybe that swings our way.
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:56 pm
Please sack Mullins and Kay almost as biased as Phil Vickery and at least he had the good sense to stop his commentary career 
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:57 pm
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:57 pm
I mean, we can talk about whether Farrell should play for England (no) but surely Sinkler and Vunipola can't be given any more chances?
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:57 pm
“Playing 10 properly”… what does that even mean.
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:57 pm
SCW still lauding iceman
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:58 pm
Farrell is responsible for that loss for giving them a kickable pen by getting us marched back 10m for being a cunt
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:58 pm
Comiserations, but well done England, a real performance and a real contest.
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:58 pm
Simples..SA reserve pack vastly superior to Eng at scrumtime.
Steward's poor kick sealed it at the crucial time.
Well done SA.
Well done Eng for making a game of it, helped by the weather.
Never looked like scoring a try, has to be said.
Steward's poor kick sealed it at the crucial time.
Well done SA.
Well done Eng for making a game of it, helped by the weather.
Never looked like scoring a try, has to be said.
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:58 pm
Genge and Sinckler good carriers but not great at bread and butter of scrummaging
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:59 pm
Second front row no up to it.
Billy cannot keep ball in contact
But that said they had a limited team and coaches constructed a very limited game plan. And it almost worked.
Billy cannot keep ball in contact
But that said they had a limited team and coaches constructed a very limited game plan. And it almost worked.
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:59 pm
Being more positive Martin was great!
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:00 pm
Koch has done what any prop would when he realises the ref isn't interested in him.
It's all ifs and buts, that last Steward kick, when we'd just had joy killing their momentum by kicking longer was a killer error.
It's all ifs and buts, that last Steward kick, when we'd just had joy killing their momentum by kicking longer was a killer error.
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:00 pm
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:01 pm
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:02 pm
So who says 10-man rugby is dead?
England lost that when they subbed the two starting props. Their replacements were absolutely munched in the scrums. That said, for the final SA scrum penalty that won the game, their TH was boring like hell.
England lost that when they subbed the two starting props. Their replacements were absolutely munched in the scrums. That said, for the final SA scrum penalty that won the game, their TH was boring like hell.
Re: SF v SA
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:02 pm
yeah one and not plural which is what we all expected.